Penetration Testing for System Security: Methods and Practical Approaches
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.19174v1
- Date: Sun, 25 May 2025 14:46:00 GMT
- Title: Penetration Testing for System Security: Methods and Practical Approaches
- Authors: Wei Zhang, Ju Xing, Xiaoqi Li,
- Abstract summary: This study aims not only to clarify the theoretical foundations of penetration testing but also to explain and demonstrate the complete testing process.<n>The paper outlines the five basic stages of a typical penetration test: intelligence gathering, vulnerability scanning, vulnerability exploitation, privilege escalation, and post-exploitation activities.
- Score: 4.127929080147854
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Penetration testing refers to the process of simulating hacker attacks to evaluate the security of information systems . This study aims not only to clarify the theoretical foundations of penetration testing but also to explain and demonstrate the complete testing process, including how network system administrators may simulate attacks using various penetration testing methods. Methodologically, the paper outlines the five basic stages of a typical penetration test: intelligence gathering, vulnerability scanning, vulnerability exploitation, privilege escalation, and post-exploitation activities. In each phase, specific tools and techniques are examined in detail, along with practical guidance on their use. To enhance the practical relevance of the study, the paper also presents a real-life case study, illustrating how a complete penetration test is conducted in a real-world environment. Through this case, readers can gain insights into the detailed procedures and applied techniques, thereby deepening their understanding of the practical value of penetration testing. Finally, the paper summarizes the importance and necessity of penetration testing in securing information systems and maintaining network integrity, and it explores future trends and development directions for the field. Overall, the findings of this paper offer valuable references for both researchers and practitioners, contributing meaningfully to the improvement of penetration testing practices and the advancement of cybersecurity as a whole.
Related papers
- Towards Reliable Forgetting: A Survey on Machine Unlearning Verification [26.88376128769619]
This paper presents the first structured survey of machine unlearning verification methods.<n>We propose a taxonomy that organizes current techniques into two principal categories -- behavioral verification and parametric verification.<n>We examine their underlying assumptions, strengths, and limitations, and identify potential vulnerabilities in practical deployment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-18T03:33:59Z) - Advancing Embodied Agent Security: From Safety Benchmarks to Input Moderation [52.83870601473094]
Embodied agents exhibit immense potential across a multitude of domains.<n>Existing research predominantly concentrates on the security of general large language models.<n>This paper introduces a novel input moderation framework, meticulously designed to safeguard embodied agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-22T08:34:35Z) - Insider Threats Mitigation: Role of Penetration Testing [0.0]
This study aims to improve the knowledge of penetration testing as a critical part of insider threat defense.
We look at how penetration testing is used in different industries, present case studies with real-world implementations, and discuss the obstacles and constraints that businesses must overcome.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-24T15:14:48Z) - A Survey of Defenses against AI-generated Visual Media: Detection, Disruption, and Authentication [15.879482578829489]
Deep generative models have demonstrated impressive performance in various computer vision applications.
These models may be used for malicious purposes, such as misinformation, deception, and copyright violation.
This paper provides a systematic and timely review of research efforts on defenses against AI-generated visual media.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-15T09:46:02Z) - SoK: Machine Learning for Misinformation Detection [0.8057006406834466]
We examine the disconnect between scholarship and practice in applying machine learning to trust and safety problems.<n>We survey literature on automated detection of misinformation across a corpus of 248 well-cited papers in the field.<n>We conclude that the current state-of-the-art in fully-automated detection has limited efficacy in detecting human-generated misinformation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-23T15:52:20Z) - Constrained Adversarial Learning for Automated Software Testing: a literature review [0.0]
This literature review is focused on the current state-of-the-art of constrained data generation approaches applied for adversarial learning and software testing.<n>The advantages and limitations of those specific for white-box, grey-box, and black-box testing were analyzed.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-14T00:27:33Z) - Adversarial Attacks and Defenses in Machine Learning-Powered Networks: A
Contemporary Survey [114.17568992164303]
Adrial attacks and defenses in machine learning and deep neural network have been gaining significant attention.
This survey provides a comprehensive overview of the recent advancements in the field of adversarial attack and defense techniques.
New avenues of attack are also explored, including search-based, decision-based, drop-based, and physical-world attacks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-11T04:19:31Z) - Human-in-the-Loop Disinformation Detection: Stance, Sentiment, or
Something Else? [93.91375268580806]
Both politics and pandemics have recently provided ample motivation for the development of machine learning-enabled disinformation (a.k.a. fake news) detection algorithms.
Existing literature has focused primarily on the fully-automated case, but the resulting techniques cannot reliably detect disinformation on the varied topics, sources, and time scales required for military applications.
By leveraging an already-available analyst as a human-in-the-loop, canonical machine learning techniques of sentiment analysis, aspect-based sentiment analysis, and stance detection become plausible methods to use for a partially-automated disinformation detection system.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-09T13:30:34Z) - Deep Learning Schema-based Event Extraction: Literature Review and
Current Trends [60.29289298349322]
Event extraction technology based on deep learning has become a research hotspot.
This paper fills the gap by reviewing the state-of-the-art approaches, focusing on deep learning-based models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-05T16:32:45Z) - Dos and Don'ts of Machine Learning in Computer Security [74.1816306998445]
Despite great potential, machine learning in security is prone to subtle pitfalls that undermine its performance.
We identify common pitfalls in the design, implementation, and evaluation of learning-based security systems.
We propose actionable recommendations to support researchers in avoiding or mitigating the pitfalls where possible.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-19T13:09:31Z) - Survey of Network Intrusion Detection Methods from the Perspective of
the Knowledge Discovery in Databases Process [63.75363908696257]
We review the methods that have been applied to network data with the purpose of developing an intrusion detector.
We discuss the techniques used for the capture, preparation and transformation of the data, as well as, the data mining and evaluation methods.
As a result of this literature review, we investigate some open issues which will need to be considered for further research in the area of network security.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-01-27T11:21:05Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.