SoK: Machine Learning for Misinformation Detection

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.12215v4
• Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2025 02:36:13 GMT
• Title: SoK: Machine Learning for Misinformation Detection
• Authors: Madelyne Xiao, Jonathan Mayer,
• Abstract summary: We examine the disconnect between scholarship and practice in applying machine learning to trust and safety problems. We survey literature on automated detection of misinformation across a corpus of 248 well-cited papers in the field. We conclude that the current state-of-the-art in fully-automated detection has limited efficacy in detecting human-generated misinformation.
• Score: 0.8057006406834466
• License:
• Abstract: We examine the disconnect between scholarship and practice in applying machine learning to trust and safety problems, using misinformation detection as a case study. We survey literature on automated detection of misinformation across a corpus of 248 well-cited papers in the field. We then examine subsets of papers for data and code availability, design missteps, reproducibility, and generalizability. Our paper corpus includes published work in security, natural language processing, and computational social science. Across these disparate disciplines, we identify common errors in dataset and method design. In general, detection tasks are often meaningfully distinct from the challenges that online services actually face. Datasets and model evaluation are often non-representative of real-world contexts, and evaluation frequently is not independent of model training. We demonstrate the limitations of current detection methods in a series of three representative replication studies. Based on the results of these analyses and our literature survey, we conclude that the current state-of-the-art in fully-automated misinformation detection has limited efficacy in detecting human-generated misinformation. We offer recommendations for evaluating applications of machine learning to trust and safety problems and recommend future directions for research.

Related papers

• Online Model-based Anomaly Detection in Multivariate Time Series: Taxonomy, Survey, Research Challenges and Future Directions [0.017476232824732776]
  Time-series anomaly detection plays an important role in engineering processes. This survey introduces a novel taxonomy where a distinction between online and offline, and training and inference is made. It presents the most popular data sets and evaluation metrics used in the literature, as well as a detailed analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-07T13:01:10Z)
• Verification of Machine Unlearning is Fragile [48.71651033308842]
  We introduce two novel adversarial unlearning processes capable of circumventing both types of verification strategies. This study highlights the vulnerabilities and limitations in machine unlearning verification, paving the way for further research into the safety of machine unlearning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-01T21:37:10Z)
• Navigating the Shadows: Unveiling Effective Disturbances for Modern AI Content Detectors [24.954755569786396]
  AI-text detection has emerged to distinguish between human and machine-generated content. Recent research indicates that these detection systems often lack robustness and struggle to effectively differentiate perturbed texts. Our work simulates real-world scenarios in both informal and professional writing, exploring the out-of-the-box performance of current detectors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T08:37:01Z)
• A Comprehensive Library for Benchmarking Multi-class Visual Anomaly Detection [52.228708947607636]
  This paper introduces a comprehensive visual anomaly detection benchmark, ADer, which is a modular framework for new methods. The benchmark includes multiple datasets from industrial and medical domains, implementing fifteen state-of-the-art methods and nine comprehensive metrics. We objectively reveal the strengths and weaknesses of different methods and provide insights into the challenges and future directions of multi-class visual anomaly detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-05T13:40:07Z)
• Gone but Not Forgotten: Improved Benchmarks for Machine Unlearning [0.0]
  We describe and propose alternative evaluation methods for machine unlearning algorithms. We show the utility of our alternative evaluations via a series of experiments of state-of-the-art unlearning algorithms on different computer vision datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-29T15:53:23Z)
• Assaying on the Robustness of Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detectors [57.7003399760813]
  We explore advanced Large Language Models (LLMs) and their specialized variants, contributing to this field in several ways. We uncover a significant correlation between topics and detection performance. These investigations shed light on the adaptability and robustness of these detection methods across diverse topics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-20T10:53:53Z)
• Annotation Error Detection: Analyzing the Past and Present for a More Coherent Future [63.99570204416711]
  We reimplement 18 methods for detecting potential annotation errors and evaluate them on 9 English datasets. We define a uniform evaluation setup including a new formalization of the annotation error detection task. We release our datasets and implementations in an easy-to-use and open source software package.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-05T22:31:45Z)
• Poisoning Attacks and Defenses on Artificial Intelligence: A Survey [3.706481388415728]
  Data poisoning attacks represent a type of attack that consists of tampering the data samples fed to the model during the training phase, leading to a degradation in the models accuracy during the inference phase. This work compiles the most relevant insights and findings found in the latest existing literatures addressing this type of attacks. A thorough assessment is performed on the reviewed works, comparing the effects of data poisoning on a wide range of ML models in real-world conditions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-21T14:43:38Z)
• Human-in-the-Loop Disinformation Detection: Stance, Sentiment, or Something Else? [93.91375268580806]
  Both politics and pandemics have recently provided ample motivation for the development of machine learning-enabled disinformation (a.k.a. fake news) detection algorithms. Existing literature has focused primarily on the fully-automated case, but the resulting techniques cannot reliably detect disinformation on the varied topics, sources, and time scales required for military applications. By leveraging an already-available analyst as a human-in-the-loop, canonical machine learning techniques of sentiment analysis, aspect-based sentiment analysis, and stance detection become plausible methods to use for a partially-automated disinformation detection system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-09T13:30:34Z)
• Individual Explanations in Machine Learning Models: A Survey for Practitioners [69.02688684221265]
  The use of sophisticated statistical models that influence decisions in domains of high societal relevance is on the rise. Many governments, institutions, and companies are reluctant to their adoption as their output is often difficult to explain in human-interpretable ways. Recently, the academic literature has proposed a substantial amount of methods for providing interpretable explanations to machine learning models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-09T01:46:34Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.