LLM-Guided Reinforcement Learning: Addressing Training Bottlenecks through Policy Modulation
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.20671v1
- Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 03:40:02 GMT
- Title: LLM-Guided Reinforcement Learning: Addressing Training Bottlenecks through Policy Modulation
- Authors: Heng Tan, Hua Yan, Yu Yang,
- Abstract summary: Reinforcement learning (RL) has achieved notable success in various domains.<n>Training effective policies for complex tasks remains challenging.<n>Existing approaches to mitigate training bottlenecks fall into two categories.
- Score: 7.054214377609925
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: While reinforcement learning (RL) has achieved notable success in various domains, training effective policies for complex tasks remains challenging. Agents often converge to local optima and fail to maximize long-term rewards. Existing approaches to mitigate training bottlenecks typically fall into two categories: (i) Automated policy refinement, which identifies critical states from past trajectories to guide policy updates, but suffers from costly and uncertain model training; and (ii) Human-in-the-loop refinement, where human feedback is used to correct agent behavior, but this does not scale well to environments with large or continuous action spaces. In this work, we design a large language model-guided policy modulation framework that leverages LLMs to improve RL training without additional model training or human intervention. We first prompt an LLM to identify critical states from a sub-optimal agent's trajectories. Based on these states, the LLM then provides action suggestions and assigns implicit rewards to guide policy refinement. Experiments across standard RL benchmarks demonstrate that our method outperforms state-of-the-art baselines, highlighting the effectiveness of LLM-based explanations in addressing RL training bottlenecks.
Related papers
- Training LLM-Based Agents with Synthetic Self-Reflected Trajectories and Partial Masking [61.61356842567952]
We propose STeP, a novel method for improving LLM-based agent training.<n>We synthesize self-reflected trajectories that include reflections and corrections of error steps.<n>Experiments demonstrate that our method improves agent performance across three representative tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-26T14:11:12Z) - Fast Adaptation with Behavioral Foundation Models [82.34700481726951]
Unsupervised zero-shot reinforcement learning has emerged as a powerful paradigm for pretraining behavioral foundation models.<n>Despite promising results, zero-shot policies are often suboptimal due to errors induced by the unsupervised training process.<n>We propose fast adaptation strategies that search in the low-dimensional task-embedding space of the pre-trained BFM to rapidly improve the performance of its zero-shot policies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-10T16:14:17Z) - LLM Post-Training: A Deep Dive into Reasoning Large Language Models [131.10969986056]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have transformed the natural language processing landscape and brought to life diverse applications.<n>Post-training methods enable LLMs to refine their knowledge, improve reasoning, enhance factual accuracy, and align more effectively with user intents and ethical considerations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-28T18:59:54Z) - CAMEL: Continuous Action Masking Enabled by Large Language Models for Reinforcement Learning [3.602902292270654]
Reinforcement learning (RL) in continuous action spaces encounters persistent challenges, such as inefficient exploration and convergence to suboptimal solutions.<n>We propose CAMEL, a novel framework integrating LLM-generated suboptimal policies into the RL training pipeline.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-17T15:22:19Z) - Large Language Model driven Policy Exploration for Recommender Systems [50.70228564385797]
offline RL policies trained on static user data are vulnerable to distribution shift when deployed in dynamic online environments.<n>Online RL-based RS also face challenges in production deployment due to the risks of exposing users to untrained or unstable policies.<n>Large Language Models (LLMs) offer a promising solution to mimic user objectives and preferences for pre-training policies offline.<n>We propose an Interaction-Augmented Learned Policy (iALP) that utilizes user preferences distilled from an LLM.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-23T16:37:44Z) - Guiding Reinforcement Learning Using Uncertainty-Aware Large Language Models [1.2233495442213964]
Large Language Models (LLMs) offer a promising alternative to mitigate RL sample inefficiency and potentially replace human trainers.<n>We address this limitation by a calibrated guidance system that uses Monte Carlo Dropout to enhance LLM advice reliability.<n>We also develop a novel RL policy shaping method based on dynamic model average entropy to adjust the LLM's influence on RL policies according to guidance uncertainty.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-15T22:00:29Z) - VinePPO: Refining Credit Assignment in RL Training of LLMs [66.80143024475635]
We propose VinePPO, a straightforward approach that leverages the flexibility of language environments to compute unbiased Monte Carlo-based estimates.<n>Our method consistently outperforms PPO and other baselines across MATH and GSM8K datasets in less wall-clock time.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-02T15:49:30Z) - How Can LLM Guide RL? A Value-Based Approach [68.55316627400683]
Reinforcement learning (RL) has become the de facto standard practice for sequential decision-making problems by improving future acting policies with feedback.
Recent developments in large language models (LLMs) have showcased impressive capabilities in language understanding and generation, yet they fall short in exploration and self-improvement capabilities.
We develop an algorithm named LINVIT that incorporates LLM guidance as a regularization factor in value-based RL, leading to significant reductions in the amount of data needed for learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-25T20:07:13Z) - Reinforcement Learning from LLM Feedback to Counteract Goal
Misgeneralization [0.0]
We introduce a method to address goal misgeneralization in reinforcement learning (RL)
Goal misgeneralization occurs when an agent retains its capabilities out-of-distribution yet pursues a proxy rather than the intended one.
This study demonstrates how the Large Language Model can efficiently supervise RL agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-14T01:09:48Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.