Found in Translation: Measuring Multilingual LLM Consistency as Simple as Translate then Evaluate

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.21999v1
• Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 06:00:21 GMT
• Title: Found in Translation: Measuring Multilingual LLM Consistency as Simple as Translate then Evaluate
• Authors: Ashim Gupta, Maitrey Mehta, Zhichao Xu, Vivek Srikumar,
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) provide detailed and impressive responses to queries in English.<n>But are they really consistent at responding to the same query in other languages?<n>We propose a framework to evaluate LLM's cross-lingual consistency based on a simple Translate then Evaluate strategy.
• Score: 36.641755706551336
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) provide detailed and impressive responses to queries in English. However, are they really consistent at responding to the same query in other languages? The popular way of evaluating for multilingual performance of LLMs requires expensive-to-collect annotated datasets. Further, evaluating for tasks like open-ended generation, where multiple correct answers may exist, is nontrivial. Instead, we propose to evaluate the predictability of model response across different languages. In this work, we propose a framework to evaluate LLM's cross-lingual consistency based on a simple Translate then Evaluate strategy. We instantiate this evaluation framework along two dimensions of consistency: information and empathy. Our results reveal pronounced inconsistencies in popular LLM responses across thirty languages, with severe performance deficits in certain language families and scripts, underscoring critical weaknesses in their multilingual capabilities. These findings necessitate cross-lingual evaluations that are consistent along multiple dimensions. We invite practitioners to use our framework for future multilingual LLM benchmarking.

Related papers

• Evaluating Large Language Model with Knowledge Oriented Language Specific Simple Question Answering [73.73820209993515]
  We introduce KoLasSimpleQA, the first benchmark evaluating the multilingual factual ability of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>Inspired by existing research, we created the question set with features such as single knowledge point coverage, absolute objectivity, unique answers, and temporal stability.<n>Results show significant performance differences between the two domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-22T12:27:02Z)
• MUG-Eval: A Proxy Evaluation Framework for Multilingual Generation Capabilities in Any Language [16.21019515431378]
  We propose MUG-Eval, a novel framework that evaluates large language models' multilingual generation capabilities.<n>We transform existing benchmarks into conversational tasks and measure the LLMs' accuracies on those tasks.<n>We evaluate 8 LLMs across 30 languages spanning high, mid, and low-resource categories, and we find that MUG-Eval correlates strongly with established benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-20T14:14:00Z)
• Understanding LLMs' Cross-Lingual Context Retrieval: How Good It Is And Where It Comes From [61.63091726904068]
  We evaluate the cross-lingual context retrieval ability of over 40 large language models (LLMs) across 12 languages.<n>Several small, post-trained open LLMs show strong cross-lingual context retrieval ability.<n>Our results also indicate that larger-scale pretraining cannot improve the xMRC performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-15T06:35:27Z)
• ProverbEval: Exploring LLM Evaluation Challenges for Low-resource Language Understanding [15.93642619347214]
  We introduce proverbeval, LLM evaluation benchmark for low-resource languages.<n>Native language proverb descriptions significantly improve tasks such as proverb generation.<n> monolingual evaluations consistently outperformed their cross-lingual counterparts in generation tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-07T06:34:48Z)
• Think Carefully and Check Again! Meta-Generation Unlocking LLMs for Low-Resource Cross-Lingual Summarization [108.6908427615402]
  Cross-lingual summarization ( CLS) aims to generate a summary for the source text in a different target language.<n>Currently, instruction-tuned large language models (LLMs) excel at various English tasks.<n>Recent studies have shown that LLMs' performance on CLS tasks remains unsatisfactory even with few-shot settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-26T00:39:44Z)
• Multi-IF: Benchmarking LLMs on Multi-Turn and Multilingual Instructions Following [51.18383180774354]
  We introduce Multi-IF, a new benchmark designed to assess Large Language Models' proficiency in following multi-turn and multilingual instructions. Our evaluation of 14 state-of-the-art LLMs on Multi-IF reveals that it presents a significantly more challenging task than existing benchmarks. languages with non-Latin scripts (Hindi, Russian, and Chinese) generally exhibit higher error rates, suggesting potential limitations in the models' multilingual capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T00:59:47Z)
• What do Large Language Models Need for Machine Translation Evaluation? [12.42394213466485]
  Large language models (LLMs) can achieve results comparable to fine-tuned multilingual pre-trained language models. This paper explores what translation information, such as the source, reference, translation errors and annotation guidelines, is needed for LLMs to evaluate machine translation quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-04T09:50:45Z)
• Beneath the Surface of Consistency: Exploring Cross-lingual Knowledge Representation Sharing in LLMs [31.893686987768742]
  Language models are inconsistent in their ability to answer the same factual question across languages. We explore multilingual factual knowledge through two aspects: the model's ability to answer a query consistently across languages, and the ability to ''store'' answers in a shared representation for several languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-20T08:38:30Z)
• Understanding and Mitigating Language Confusion in LLMs [76.96033035093204]
  We evaluate 15 typologically diverse languages with existing and newly-created English and multilingual prompts.<n>We find that Llama Instruct and Mistral models exhibit high degrees of language confusion.<n>We find that language confusion can be partially mitigated via few-shot prompting, multilingual SFT and preference tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-28T17:03:51Z)
• Crosslingual Capabilities and Knowledge Barriers in Multilingual Large Language Models [62.91524967852552]
  Large language models (LLMs) are typically multilingual due to pretraining on diverse multilingual corpora.<n>But can these models relate corresponding concepts across languages, i.e., be crosslingual?<n>This study evaluates state-of-the-art LLMs on inherently crosslingual tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-23T15:15:17Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.