Are Unified Vision-Language Models Necessary: Generalization Across Understanding and Generation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.23043v1
• Date: Thu, 29 May 2025 03:40:21 GMT
• Title: Are Unified Vision-Language Models Necessary: Generalization Across Understanding and Generation
• Authors: Jihai Zhang, Tianle Li, Linjie Li, Zhengyuan Yang, Yu Cheng,
• Abstract summary: unified vision-language models (VLMs) integrate both visual understanding and generation capabilities.<n>This paper systematically investigates the generalization across understanding and generation tasks in unifiedVLMs.
• Score: 50.22361866757033
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Recent advancements in unified vision-language models (VLMs), which integrate both visual understanding and generation capabilities, have attracted significant attention. The underlying hypothesis is that a unified architecture with mixed training on both understanding and generation tasks can enable mutual enhancement between understanding and generation. However, this hypothesis remains underexplored in prior works on unified VLMs. To address this gap, this paper systematically investigates the generalization across understanding and generation tasks in unified VLMs. Specifically, we design a dataset closely aligned with real-world scenarios to facilitate extensive experiments and quantitative evaluations. We evaluate multiple unified VLM architectures to validate our findings. Our key findings are as follows. First, unified VLMs trained with mixed data exhibit mutual benefits in understanding and generation tasks across various architectures, and this mutual benefits can scale up with increased data. Second, better alignment between multimodal input and output spaces will lead to better generalization. Third, the knowledge acquired during generation tasks can transfer to understanding tasks, and this cross-task generalization occurs within the base language model, beyond modality adapters. Our findings underscore the critical necessity of unifying understanding and generation in VLMs, offering valuable insights for the design and optimization of unified VLMs.

Related papers

• Generalizing vision-language models to novel domains: A comprehensive survey [55.97518817219619]
  Vision-language pretraining has emerged as a transformative technique that integrates the strengths of both visual and textual modalities.<n>This survey aims to comprehensively summarize the generalization settings, methodologies, benchmarking and results in VLM literatures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-23T10:56:37Z)
• UniFork: Exploring Modality Alignment for Unified Multimodal Understanding and Generation [39.921363034430875]
  Unified image understanding and generation has emerged as a promising paradigm in multimodal artificial intelligence.<n>We study the modality alignment behaviors of task-specific expert models for understanding and generation.<n>We introduce UniFork, a novel Y-shaped architecture that shares the shallow layers for cross-task representation learning, while employing task-specific branches in deeper layers to avoid task interference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-20T17:52:31Z)
• Vision-Language Modeling Meets Remote Sensing: Models, Datasets and Perspectives [36.297745473653166]
  Vision-language modeling (VLM) aims to bridge the information gap between images and natural language.<n>Under the new paradigm of first pre-training on massive image-text pairs and then fine-tuning on task-specific data, VLM in the remote sensing domain has made significant progress.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-20T13:47:40Z)
• MetaMorph: Multimodal Understanding and Generation via Instruction Tuning [57.35160715164359]
  Visual-Predictive Instruction Tuning (VPiT) is a simple and effective extension to visual instruction tuning.<n>VPiT teaches an LLM to predict discrete text tokens and continuous visual tokens from any input sequence of image and text data.<n>We train our MetaMorph model and achieve competitive performance on both visual understanding and generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-18T18:58:50Z)
• Multi-Stage Knowledge Integration of Vision-Language Models for Continual Learning [79.46570165281084]
  We propose a Multi-Stage Knowledge Integration network (MulKI) to emulate the human learning process in distillation methods. MulKI achieves this through four stages, including Eliciting Ideas, Adding New Ideas, Distinguishing Ideas, and Making Connections. Our method demonstrates significant improvements in maintaining zero-shot capabilities while supporting continual learning across diverse downstream tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-11T07:36:19Z)
• Generalization v.s. Memorization: Tracing Language Models' Capabilities Back to Pretraining Data [76.90128359866462]
  We introduce an extended concept of memorization, distributional memorization, which measures the correlation between the output probabilities and the pretraining data frequency.<n>This study demonstrates that memorization plays a larger role in simpler, knowledge-intensive tasks, while generalization is the key for harder, reasoning-based tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-20T21:24:40Z)
• Unveiling the Generalization Power of Fine-Tuned Large Language Models [81.70754292058258]
  We investigate whether fine-tuning affects the intrinsic generalization ability intrinsic to Large Language Models (LLMs) Our main findings reveal that models fine-tuned on generation and classification tasks exhibit dissimilar behaviors in generalizing to different domains and tasks. We observe that integrating the in-context learning strategy during fine-tuning on generation tasks can enhance the model's generalization ability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-14T08:18:59Z)
• Exploring the Frontier of Vision-Language Models: A Survey of Current Methodologies and Future Directions [11.786387517781328]
  Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are advanced models that can tackle more intricate tasks such as image captioning and visual question answering. Our classification organizes VLMs into three distinct categories: models dedicated to vision-language understanding, models that process multimodal inputs to generate unimodal (textual) outputs and models that both accept and produce multimodal inputs and outputs. We meticulously dissect each model, offering an extensive analysis of its foundational architecture, training data sources, as well as its strengths and limitations wherever possible.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T18:57:34Z)
• Vision-Language Instruction Tuning: A Review and Analysis [52.218690619616474]
  Vision-Language Instruction Tuning (VLIT) presents more complex characteristics compared to pure text instruction tuning. We offer a detailed categorization for existing VLIT datasets and identify the characteristics that high-quality VLIT data should possess. By incorporating these characteristics as guiding principles into the existing VLIT data construction process, we conduct extensive experiments and verify their positive impact on the performance of tuned multi-modal LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-14T14:02:32Z)
• A survey on knowledge-enhanced multimodal learning [1.8591405259852054]
  Multimodal learning has been a field of increasing interest, aiming to combine various modalities in a single joint representation. Especially in the area of visiolinguistic (VL) learning multiple models and techniques have been developed, targeting a variety of tasks that involve images and text. VL models have reached unprecedented performances by extending the idea of Transformers, so that both modalities can learn from each other.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-19T14:00:50Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.