Rationales Are Not Silver Bullets: Measuring the Impact of Rationales on Model Performance and Reliability

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.24147v1
• Date: Fri, 30 May 2025 02:39:37 GMT
• Title: Rationales Are Not Silver Bullets: Measuring the Impact of Rationales on Model Performance and Reliability
• Authors: Chiwei Zhu, Benfeng Xu, An Yang, Junyang Lin, Quan Wang, Chang Zhou, Zhendong Mao,
• Abstract summary: Training language models with rationales augmentation has been shown to be beneficial in many existing works.<n>We conduct comprehensive investigations to thoroughly inspect the impact of rationales on model performance.
• Score: 70.4107059502882
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Training language models with rationales augmentation has been shown to be beneficial in many existing works. In this paper, we identify that such a prevailing view does not hold consistently. We conduct comprehensive investigations to thoroughly inspect the impact of rationales on model performance as well as a novel perspective of model reliability. The results lead to several key findings that add new insights upon existing understandings: 1) Rationales can, at times, deteriorate model performance; 2) Rationales can, at times, improve model reliability, even outperforming their untrained counterparts; 3) A linear correspondence exists in between the performance and reliability improvements, while both are driven by the intrinsic difficulty of the task. These findings provide informative regulations on the broad utilization of rationales and raise critical implications on the procedure of explicitly aligning language models with implicit human thoughts. Codes can be found at https://github.com/Ignoramus0817/rationales.

Related papers

• Exploring and Exploiting the Inherent Efficiency within Large Reasoning Models for Self-Guided Efficiency Enhancement [101.77467538102924]
  Large reasoning models (LRMs) exhibit overthinking, which hinders efficiency and inflates inference cost.<n>We propose two lightweight methods to enhance LRM efficiency.<n>First, we introduce Efficiency Steering, a training-free activation steering technique that modulates reasoning behavior via a single direction.<n>Second, we develop Self-Rewarded Efficiency RL, a reinforcement learning framework that dynamically balances task accuracy and brevity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-18T17:18:12Z)
• Safety Through Reasoning: An Empirical Study of Reasoning Guardrail Models [3.102576158218633]
  Reasoning-based language models have demonstrated strong performance across various domains.<n>Recent research has shown that reasoning also offers significant benefits for safety and guardrail applications.<n>Our study focuses on two key dimensions: data efficiency and inference efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T15:01:37Z)
• Reasoning Towards Fairness: Mitigating Bias in Language Models through Reasoning-Guided Fine-Tuning [12.559028963968247]
  We investigate the crucial relationship between a model's reasoning ability and fairness.<n>We find that larger models with stronger reasoning abilities exhibit substantially lower stereotypical bias.<n>We introduce ReGiFT, a novel approach that extracts structured reasoning traces from advanced reasoning models and infuses them into models that lack such capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-08T03:21:51Z)
• Enhancing LLM Reliability via Explicit Knowledge Boundary Modeling [48.15636223774418]
  Large language models (LLMs) frequently hallucinate due to misaligned self-awareness.<n>Existing approaches mitigate hallucinations via uncertainty estimation or query rejection.<n>We propose the Explicit Knowledge Boundary Modeling framework to integrate fast and slow reasoning systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-04T03:16:02Z)
• Causality can systematically address the monsters under the bench(marks) [64.36592889550431]
  Benchmarks are plagued by various biases, artifacts, or leakage.<n>Models may behave unreliably due to poorly explored failure modes.<n> causality offers an ideal framework to systematically address these challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-07T17:01:37Z)
• On the Fairness, Diversity and Reliability of Text-to-Image Generative Models [68.62012304574012]
  multimodal generative models have sparked critical discussions on their reliability, fairness and potential for misuse.<n>We propose an evaluation framework to assess model reliability by analyzing responses to global and local perturbations in the embedding space.<n>Our method lays the groundwork for detecting unreliable, bias-injected models and tracing the provenance of embedded biases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-21T09:46:55Z)
• Unveiling and Addressing Pseudo Forgetting in Large Language Models [17.888328120571245]
  We show that the performance degradation on previous tasks is not attributed to a loss of capabilities, but rather to the failure of the instructions to activate the appropriate model abilities.<n>We propose Rationale-Guidance Difficulty based Replay (RGD-R) framework that dynamically allocates replay data based on the model's ability to correctly leverage the intrinsic capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-18T14:28:04Z)
• Improving Language Model Reasoning with Self-motivated Learning [60.779625789039486]
  textitSelf-motivated Learning framework motivates the model itself to automatically generate rationales on existing datasets. We train a reward model with the rank to evaluate the quality of rationales, and improve the performance of reasoning through reinforcement learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-10T14:05:44Z)
• Fairness Increases Adversarial Vulnerability [50.90773979394264]
  This paper shows the existence of a dichotomy between fairness and robustness, and analyzes when achieving fairness decreases the model robustness to adversarial samples. Experiments on non-linear models and different architectures validate the theoretical findings in multiple vision domains. The paper proposes a simple, yet effective, solution to construct models achieving good tradeoffs between fairness and robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-21T19:55:35Z)
• Enhancing Model Robustness and Fairness with Causality: A Regularization Approach [15.981724441808147]
  Recent work has raised concerns on the risk of spurious correlations and unintended biases in machine learning models. We propose a simple and intuitive regularization approach to integrate causal knowledge during model training. We build a predictive model that relies more on causal features and less on non-causal features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-03T02:49:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.