Safety Through Reasoning: An Empirical Study of Reasoning Guardrail Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.20087v1
- Date: Mon, 26 May 2025 15:01:37 GMT
- Title: Safety Through Reasoning: An Empirical Study of Reasoning Guardrail Models
- Authors: Makesh Narsimhan Sreedhar, Traian Rebedea, Christopher Parisien,
- Abstract summary: Reasoning-based language models have demonstrated strong performance across various domains.<n>Recent research has shown that reasoning also offers significant benefits for safety and guardrail applications.<n>Our study focuses on two key dimensions: data efficiency and inference efficiency.
- Score: 3.102576158218633
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Reasoning-based language models have demonstrated strong performance across various domains, with the most notable gains seen in mathematical and coding tasks. Recent research has shown that reasoning also offers significant benefits for LLM safety and guardrail applications. In this work, we conduct a comprehensive analysis of training reasoning-based guardrail models for content moderation, with an emphasis on generalization to custom safety policies at inference time. Our study focuses on two key dimensions: data efficiency and inference efficiency. On the data front, we find that reasoning-based models exhibit strong sample efficiency, achieving competitive performance with significantly fewer training examples than their non-reasoning counterparts. This unlocks the potential to repurpose the remaining data for mining high-value, difficult samples that further enhance model performance. On the inference side, we evaluate practical trade-offs by introducing reasoning budgets, examining the impact of reasoning length on latency and accuracy, and exploring dual-mode training to allow runtime control over reasoning behavior. Our findings will provide practical insights for researchers and developers to effectively and efficiently train and deploy reasoning-based guardrails models in real-world systems.
Related papers
- Exploring and Exploiting the Inherent Efficiency within Large Reasoning Models for Self-Guided Efficiency Enhancement [101.77467538102924]
Large reasoning models (LRMs) exhibit overthinking, which hinders efficiency and inflates inference cost.<n>We propose two lightweight methods to enhance LRM efficiency.<n>First, we introduce Efficiency Steering, a training-free activation steering technique that modulates reasoning behavior via a single direction.<n>Second, we develop Self-Rewarded Efficiency RL, a reinforcement learning framework that dynamically balances task accuracy and brevity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-18T17:18:12Z) - Dissecting Long Reasoning Models: An Empirical Study [94.31064312707211]
We systematically analyze the roles of positive and negative samples in reinforcement learning (RL)<n>We identify substantial data inefficiency in group relative policy optimization, where over half of the samples yield zero advantage.<n>We investigate unstable performance across various reasoning models and benchmarks, attributing instability to uncertain problems with ambiguous outcomes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-05T11:47:10Z) - Beyond Accuracy: Dissecting Mathematical Reasoning for LLMs Under Reinforcement Learning [82.43575191712726]
We introduce a fine-grained analytic framework to dissect the impact ofReinforcement learning on reasoning.<n>Our framework specifically investigates key elements that have been hypothesized to benefit from RL training.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-05T07:53:59Z) - Rationales Are Not Silver Bullets: Measuring the Impact of Rationales on Model Performance and Reliability [70.4107059502882]
Training language models with rationales augmentation has been shown to be beneficial in many existing works.<n>We conduct comprehensive investigations to thoroughly inspect the impact of rationales on model performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-30T02:39:37Z) - Behavior Injection: Preparing Language Models for Reinforcement Learning [24.46625106928253]
Reinforcement fine-tuning (RFT) has emerged as a powerful post-training technique to incentivize the reasoning ability of large language models (LLMs)<n>LLMs can respond very inconsistently to RFT: some show substantial performance gains, while others plateau or even degrade.<n>We propose behavior injection, a task-agnostic data-augmentation scheme applied prior to RL.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-25T00:54:50Z) - Efficient Inference for Large Reasoning Models: A Survey [42.61170621552432]
Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) significantly improve the reasoning ability of Large Language Models (LLMs) by learning to reason.<n>However, their deliberative reasoning process leads to inefficiencies in token usage, memory consumption, and inference time.<n>This survey provides a review of efficient inference methods designed specifically for LRMs, focusing on mitigating token inefficiency while preserving the reasoning quality.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-29T13:27:46Z) - Stop Overthinking: A Survey on Efficient Reasoning for Large Language Models [54.04678363287392]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in complex tasks.<n>Recent advancements in OpenAI o1 and DeepSeek-R1 have further improved performance in System-2 reasoning domains.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-20T17:59:38Z) - Learning Planning-based Reasoning by Trajectories Collection and Process Reward Synthesizing [61.98556945939045]
We propose a framework to learn planning-based reasoning through Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) on collected trajectories.
Our results on challenging logical reasoning benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of our learning framework.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-01T15:18:33Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.