Literature Review Of Multi-Agent Debate For Problem-Solving
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.00066v1
- Date: Thu, 29 May 2025 13:57:00 GMT
- Title: Literature Review Of Multi-Agent Debate For Problem-Solving
- Authors: Arne Tillmann,
- Abstract summary: Multi-agent large language models (MA-LLMs) are a rapidly growing research area that leverages multiple interacting language agents to tackle complex tasks.<n>This literature review synthesizes the latest research on agent profiles, communication structures, and decision-making processes.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Multi-agent large language models (MA-LLMs) are a rapidly growing research area that leverages multiple interacting language agents to tackle complex tasks, outperforming single-agent large language models. This literature review synthesizes the latest research on agent profiles, communication structures, and decision-making processes, drawing insights from both traditional multi-agent systems and state-of-the-art MA-LLM studies. In doing so, it aims to address the lack of direct comparisons in the field, illustrating how factors like scalability, communication structure, and decision-making processes influence MA-LLM performance. By examining frequent practices and outlining current challenges, the review reveals that multi-agent approaches can yield superior results but also face elevated computational costs and under-explored challenges unique to MA-LLM. Overall, these findings provide researchers and practitioners with a roadmap for developing robust and efficient multi-agent AI solutions.
Related papers
- Unifying Language Agent Algorithms with Graph-based Orchestration Engine for Reproducible Agent Research [32.92036657863354]
Language agents powered by large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in understanding, reasoning, and executing complex tasks.<n>However, developing robust agents presents significant challenges: substantial engineering overhead, lack of standardized components, and insufficient evaluation frameworks for fair comparison.<n>We introduce Agent Graph-based Orchestration for Reasoning and Assessment (AGORA), a flexible and abstraction framework that addresses these challenges.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-30T08:46:23Z) - ModelingAgent: Bridging LLMs and Mathematical Modeling for Real-World Challenges [72.19809898215857]
We introduce ModelingBench, a novel benchmark featuring real-world-inspired, open-ended problems from math modeling competitions across diverse domains.<n>These tasks require translating natural language into formal mathematical formulations, applying appropriate tools, and producing structured, defensible reports.<n>We also present ModelingAgent, a multi-agent framework that coordinates tool use, supports structured, creative solutions, and generates well-grounded, creative solutions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-21T03:33:23Z) - Large Language Model Agent: A Survey on Methodology, Applications and Challenges [88.3032929492409]
Large Language Model (LLM) agents, with goal-driven behaviors and dynamic adaptation capabilities, potentially represent a critical pathway toward artificial general intelligence.<n>This survey systematically deconstructs LLM agent systems through a methodology-centered taxonomy.<n>Our work provides a unified architectural perspective, examining how agents are constructed, how they collaborate, and how they evolve over time.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-27T12:50:17Z) - MAMM-Refine: A Recipe for Improving Faithfulness in Generation with Multi-Agent Collaboration [63.31211701741323]
We extend multi-agent multi-model reasoning to generation, specifically to improving faithfulness through refinement.<n>We design intrinsic evaluations for each subtask, with our findings indicating that both multi-agent (multiple instances) and multi-model (diverse LLM types) approaches benefit error detection and critiquing.<n>We consolidate these insights into a final "recipe" called Multi-Agent Multi-Model Refinement (MAMM-Refine), where multi-agent and multi-model collaboration significantly boosts performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-19T14:46:53Z) - A Comprehensive Survey on Multi-Agent Cooperative Decision-Making: Scenarios, Approaches, Challenges and Perspectives [6.277211882332452]
Multi-agent cooperative decision-making involves multiple agents working together to complete established tasks and achieve specific objectives.<n>These techniques are widely applicable in real-world scenarios such as autonomous driving, drone navigation, disaster rescue, and simulated military confrontations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-17T17:45:46Z) - Multi-LLM Collaborative Search for Complex Problem Solving [54.194370845153784]
We propose the Mixture-of-Search-Agents (MoSA) paradigm to enhance search-based reasoning.<n>MoSA integrates diverse reasoning pathways by combining independent exploration with iterative refinement among LLMs.<n>Using Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) as a backbone, MoSA enables multiple agents to propose and aggregate reasoning steps, resulting in improved accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-26T06:31:04Z) - Optimizing Collaboration of LLM based Agents for Finite Element Analysis [1.5039745292757671]
This paper investigates the interactions between multiple agents within Large Language Models (LLMs) in the context of programming and coding tasks.
We utilize the AutoGen framework to facilitate communication among agents, evaluating different configurations based on the success rates from 40 random runs for each setup.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-23T23:11:08Z) - MMCTAgent: Multi-modal Critical Thinking Agent Framework for Complex Visual Reasoning [3.651416979200174]
MMCTAgent is a novel critical thinking agent framework designed to address the inherent limitations of current MLLMs in complex visual reasoning tasks.
Inspired by human cognitive processes and critical thinking, MMCTAgent iteratively analyzes multi-modal information, decomposes queries, plans strategies, and dynamically evolves its reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-28T16:55:41Z) - Large Multimodal Agents: A Survey [78.81459893884737]
Large language models (LLMs) have achieved superior performance in powering text-based AI agents.
There is an emerging research trend focused on extending these LLM-powered AI agents into the multimodal domain.
This review aims to provide valuable insights and guidelines for future research in this rapidly evolving field.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-23T06:04:23Z) - DIME: Fine-grained Interpretations of Multimodal Models via Disentangled
Local Explanations [119.1953397679783]
We focus on advancing the state-of-the-art in interpreting multimodal models.
Our proposed approach, DIME, enables accurate and fine-grained analysis of multimodal models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-03T20:52:47Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.