Unifying Language Agent Algorithms with Graph-based Orchestration Engine for Reproducible Agent Research
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.24354v1
- Date: Fri, 30 May 2025 08:46:23 GMT
- Title: Unifying Language Agent Algorithms with Graph-based Orchestration Engine for Reproducible Agent Research
- Authors: Qianqian Zhang, Jiajia Liao, Heting Ying, Yibo Ma, Haozhan Shen, Jingcheng Li, Peng Liu, Lu Zhang, Chunxin Fang, Kyusong Lee, Ruochen Xu, Tiancheng Zhao,
- Abstract summary: Language agents powered by large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in understanding, reasoning, and executing complex tasks.<n>However, developing robust agents presents significant challenges: substantial engineering overhead, lack of standardized components, and insufficient evaluation frameworks for fair comparison.<n>We introduce Agent Graph-based Orchestration for Reasoning and Assessment (AGORA), a flexible and abstraction framework that addresses these challenges.
- Score: 32.92036657863354
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Language agents powered by large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in understanding, reasoning, and executing complex tasks. However, developing robust agents presents significant challenges: substantial engineering overhead, lack of standardized components, and insufficient evaluation frameworks for fair comparison. We introduce Agent Graph-based Orchestration for Reasoning and Assessment (AGORA), a flexible and extensible framework that addresses these challenges through three key contributions: (1) a modular architecture with a graph-based workflow engine, efficient memory management, and clean component abstraction; (2) a comprehensive suite of reusable agent algorithms implementing state-of-the-art reasoning approaches; and (3) a rigorous evaluation framework enabling systematic comparison across multiple dimensions. Through extensive experiments on mathematical reasoning and multimodal tasks, we evaluate various agent algorithms across different LLMs, revealing important insights about their relative strengths and applicability. Our results demonstrate that while sophisticated reasoning approaches can enhance agent capabilities, simpler methods like Chain-of-Thought often exhibit robust performance with significantly lower computational overhead. AGORA not only simplifies language agent development but also establishes a foundation for reproducible agent research through standardized evaluation protocols.
Related papers
- Understanding Software Engineering Agents: A Study of Thought-Action-Result Trajectories [18.129031749321058]
Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents are increasingly employed to automate complex software engineering tasks.<n>Despite their widespread adoption, the internal decision-making processes of these agents remain largely unexplored.<n>We present a large-scale empirical study of the thought-action-result trajectories of three state-of-the-art LLM-based agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-23T16:34:52Z) - AgentSwift: Efficient LLM Agent Design via Value-guided Hierarchical Search [58.98450205734779]
Large language model (LLM) agents have demonstrated strong capabilities across diverse domains.<n>Existing agent search methods suffer from three major limitations.<n>We introduce a comprehensive framework to address these challenges.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-06T12:07:23Z) - Comparative Analysis of AI Agent Architectures for Entity Relationship Classification [1.6887793771613606]
In this study, we conduct a comparative analysis of three distinct AI agent architectures to perform relation classification.<n>The agentic architectures explored include (1) reflective self-evaluation, (2) hierarchical task decomposition, and (3) a novel multi-agent dynamic example generation mechanism.<n>Our experiments demonstrate that multi-agent coordination consistently outperforms standard few-shot prompting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-03T04:19:47Z) - MA-RAG: Multi-Agent Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Collaborative Chain-of-Thought Reasoning [43.66966457772646]
MA-RAG orchestrates a collaborative set of specialized AI agents to tackle each stage of the RAG pipeline with task-aware reasoning.<n>Our design allows fine-grained control over information flow without any model fine-tuning.<n>This modular and reasoning-driven architecture enables MA-RAG to deliver robust, interpretable results.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-26T15:05:18Z) - Multi-Agent Collaboration via Evolving Orchestration [61.93162413517026]
Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable results across diverse downstream tasks, but their monolithic nature restricts scalability and efficiency in complex problem-solving.<n>We propose a puppeteer-style paradigm for LLM-based multi-agent collaboration, where a central orchestrator dynamically directs agents in response to evolving task states.<n> Experiments on closed- and open-domain scenarios show that this method achieves superior performance with reduced computational costs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-26T07:02:17Z) - A Survey of Frontiers in LLM Reasoning: Inference Scaling, Learning to Reason, and Agentic Systems [93.8285345915925]
Reasoning is a fundamental cognitive process that enables logical inference, problem-solving, and decision-making.<n>With the rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs), reasoning has emerged as a key capability that distinguishes advanced AI systems.<n>We categorize existing methods along two dimensions: (1) Regimes, which define the stage at which reasoning is achieved; and (2) Architectures, which determine the components involved in the reasoning process.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-12T01:27:49Z) - Factored Agents: Decoupling In-Context Learning and Memorization for Robust Tool Use [4.437184840125514]
We propose a novel factored agent architecture designed to overcome the limitations of traditional single-agent systems in agentic AI.<n>Our approach decomposes the agent into two specialized components: (1) a large language model that serves as a high level planner and in-context learner, and (2) a smaller language model which acts as a memorizer of tool format and output.<n> Empirical evaluations demonstrate that our factored architecture significantly improves planning accuracy and error resilience, while elucidating the inherent trade-off between in-context learning and static memorization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-29T01:27:11Z) - ReMA: Learning to Meta-think for LLMs with Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [53.817538122688944]
We introduce Reinforced Meta-thinking Agents (ReMA) to elicit meta-thinking behaviors from Reasoning of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>ReMA decouples the reasoning process into two hierarchical agents: a high-level meta-thinking agent responsible for generating strategic oversight and plans, and a low-level reasoning agent for detailed executions.<n> Empirical results from single-turn experiments demonstrate that ReMA outperforms single-agent RL baselines on complex reasoning tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-12T16:05:31Z) - BRiTE: Bootstrapping Reinforced Thinking Process to Enhance Language Model Reasoning [78.63421517563056]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in complex reasoning tasks.<n>We present a unified probabilistic framework that formalizes LLM reasoning through a novel graphical model.<n>We introduce the Bootstrapping Reinforced Thinking Process (BRiTE) algorithm, which works in two steps.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-31T02:39:07Z) - Textualized Agent-Style Reasoning for Complex Tasks by Multiple Round LLM Generation [49.27250832754313]
We present AgentCOT, a llm-based autonomous agent framework.
At each step, AgentCOT selects an action and executes it to yield an intermediate result with supporting evidence.
We introduce two new strategies to enhance the performance of AgentCOT.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-19T02:20:06Z) - Optimizing Collaboration of LLM based Agents for Finite Element Analysis [1.5039745292757671]
This paper investigates the interactions between multiple agents within Large Language Models (LLMs) in the context of programming and coding tasks.
We utilize the AutoGen framework to facilitate communication among agents, evaluating different configurations based on the success rates from 40 random runs for each setup.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-23T23:11:08Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.