Learning Treatment Representations for Downstream Instrumental Variable Regression

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.02200v2
• Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2025 02:58:39 GMT
• Title: Learning Treatment Representations for Downstream Instrumental Variable Regression
• Authors: Shiangyi Lin, Hui Lan, Vasilis Syrgkanis,
• Abstract summary: We propose a novel approach to construct treatment representations by explicitly incorporating instrumental variables during the representation learning process.<n>Our approach provides a framework for handling high-dimensional endogenous variables with limited instruments.
• Score: 18.14729078900216
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Traditional instrumental variable (IV) estimators face a fundamental constraint: they can only accommodate as many endogenous treatment variables as available instruments. This limitation becomes particularly challenging in settings where the treatment is presented in a high-dimensional and unstructured manner (e.g. descriptions of patient treatment pathways in a hospital). In such settings, researchers typically resort to applying unsupervised dimension reduction techniques to learn a low-dimensional treatment representation prior to implementing IV regression analysis. We show that such methods can suffer from substantial omitted variable bias due to implicit regularization in the representation learning step. We propose a novel approach to construct treatment representations by explicitly incorporating instrumental variables during the representation learning process. Our approach provides a framework for handling high-dimensional endogenous variables with limited instruments. We demonstrate both theoretically and empirically that fitting IV models on these instrument-informed representations ensures identification of directions that optimize outcome prediction. Our experiments show that our proposed methodology improves upon the conventional two-stage approaches that perform dimension reduction without incorporating instrument information.

Related papers

• GuidedRec: Guiding Ill-Posed Unsupervised Volumetric Recovery [47.758461573050006]
  We show how to use a generative model of the volume structures to constrain the deformation and obtain a correct estimate. We evaluate our approach on a challenging dataset and show it outperforms state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-20T12:13:22Z)
• Geometry-Aware Instrumental Variable Regression [56.16884466478886]
  We propose a transport-based IV estimator that takes into account the geometry of the data manifold through data-derivative information. We provide a simple plug-and-play implementation of our method that performs on par with related estimators in standard settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-19T17:49:33Z)
• Regularized DeepIV with Model Selection [72.17508967124081]
  Regularized DeepIV (RDIV) regression can converge to the least-norm IV solution. Our method matches the current state-of-the-art convergence rate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-07T05:38:56Z)
• Nonparametric Instrumental Variable Regression through Stochastic Approximate Gradients [0.3277163122167434]
  We show how to formulate a functional gradient descent algorithm to tackle NPIV regression by directly minimizing the populational risk.<n>We provide theoretical support in the form of bounds on the excess risk, and conduct numerical experiments showcasing our method's superior stability and competitive performance.<n>This algorithm enables flexible estimator choices, such as neural networks or kernel based methods, as well as non-quadratic loss functions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-08T12:50:38Z)
• Benchmarking Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Models through the Lens of Interpretability [82.29775890542967]
  Estimating personalized effects of treatments is a complex, yet pervasive problem. Recent developments in the machine learning literature on heterogeneous treatment effect estimation gave rise to many sophisticated, but opaque, tools. We use post-hoc feature importance methods to identify features that influence the model's predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-16T17:59:05Z)
• Predictive machine learning for prescriptive applications: a coupled training-validating approach [77.34726150561087]
  We propose a new method for training predictive machine learning models for prescriptive applications. This approach is based on tweaking the validation step in the standard training-validating-testing scheme. Several experiments with synthetic data demonstrate promising results in reducing the prescription costs in both deterministic and real models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-22T15:03:20Z)
• Improving Inference from Simple Instruments through Compliance Estimation [0.0]
  Instrumental variables (IV) regression is widely used to estimate causal treatment effects in settings where receipt of treatment is not fully random. While IV can recover consistent treatment effect estimates, they are often noisy. We study how to improve the efficiency of IV estimates by exploiting the predictable variation in the strength of the instrument.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-08T20:18:34Z)
• Mostly Harmless Machine Learning: Learning Optimal Instruments in Linear IV Models [3.7599363231894176]
  We offer theoretical results that justify incorporating machine learning in the standard linear instrumental variable setting. We use machine learning, combined with sample-splitting, to predict the treatment variable from the instrument. This allows the researcher to extract non-linear co-variation between the treatment and instrument.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-12T01:55:11Z)
• Learning Deep Features in Instrumental Variable Regression [42.085253974990046]
  In IV regression, learning proceeds in two stages: stage 1 performs linear regression from the instrument to the treatment; and stage 2 performs linear regression from the treatment to the outcome, conditioned on the instrument. We propose a novel method, deep feature instrumental variable regression (DFIV), to address the case where relations between instruments, treatments, and outcomes may be nonlinear.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-14T15:14:49Z)
• Generalization Bounds and Representation Learning for Estimation of Potential Outcomes and Causal Effects [61.03579766573421]
  We study estimation of individual-level causal effects, such as a single patient's response to alternative medication. We devise representation learning algorithms that minimize our bound, by regularizing the representation's induced treatment group distance. We extend these algorithms to simultaneously learn a weighted representation to further reduce treatment group distances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-21T10:16:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.