Improving Inference from Simple Instruments through Compliance Estimation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2108.03726v1
• Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2021 20:18:34 GMT
• Title: Improving Inference from Simple Instruments through Compliance Estimation
• Authors: Stephen Coussens, Jann Spiess
• Abstract summary: Instrumental variables (IV) regression is widely used to estimate causal treatment effects in settings where receipt of treatment is not fully random. While IV can recover consistent treatment effect estimates, they are often noisy. We study how to improve the efficiency of IV estimates by exploiting the predictable variation in the strength of the instrument.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Instrumental variables (IV) regression is widely used to estimate causal treatment effects in settings where receipt of treatment is not fully random, but there exists an instrument that generates exogenous variation in treatment exposure. While IV can recover consistent treatment effect estimates, they are often noisy. Building upon earlier work in biostatistics (Joffe and Brensinger, 2003) and relating to an evolving literature in econometrics (including Abadie et al., 2019; Huntington-Klein, 2020; Borusyak and Hull, 2020), we study how to improve the efficiency of IV estimates by exploiting the predictable variation in the strength of the instrument. In the case where both the treatment and instrument are binary and the instrument is independent of baseline covariates, we study weighting each observation according to its estimated compliance (that is, its conditional probability of being affected by the instrument), which we motivate from a (constrained) solution of the first-stage prediction problem implicit to IV. The resulting estimator can leverage machine learning to estimate compliance as a function of baseline covariates. We derive the large-sample properties of a specific implementation of a weighted IV estimator in the potential outcomes and local average treatment effect (LATE) frameworks, and provide tools for inference that remain valid even when the weights are estimated nonparametrically. With both theoretical results and a simulation study, we demonstrate that compliance weighting meaningfully reduces the variance of IV estimates when first-stage heterogeneity is present, and that this improvement often outweighs any difference between the compliance-weighted and unweighted IV estimands. These results suggest that in a variety of applied settings, the precision of IV estimates can be substantially improved by incorporating compliance estimation.

Related papers

• Estimating Heterogeneous Treatment Effects by Combining Weak Instruments and Observational Data [44.31792000298105]
  Accurately predicting conditional average treatment effects (CATEs) is crucial in personalized medicine and digital platform analytics. We develop a novel approach to combine IV and observational data to enable reliable CATE estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-10T16:40:55Z)
• Proximal Causal Learning of Conditional Average Treatment Effects [0.0]
  We propose a tailored two-stage loss function for learning heterogeneous treatment effects. Our proposed estimator can be implemented by off-the-shelf loss-minimizing machine learning methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-26T02:56:36Z)
• Estimating individual treatment effects under unobserved confounding using binary instruments [21.563820572163337]
  Estimating individual treatment effects (ITEs) from observational data is relevant in many fields such as personalized medicine. We propose a novel, multiply robust machine learning framework, called MRIV, for estimating ITEs using binary IVs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-17T21:25:09Z)
• Benchmarking Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Models through the Lens of Interpretability [82.29775890542967]
  Estimating personalized effects of treatments is a complex, yet pervasive problem. Recent developments in the machine learning literature on heterogeneous treatment effect estimation gave rise to many sophisticated, but opaque, tools. We use post-hoc feature importance methods to identify features that influence the model's predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-16T17:59:05Z)
• Robust and Agnostic Learning of Conditional Distributional Treatment Effects [62.44901952244514]
  The conditional average treatment effect (CATE) is the best point prediction of individual causal effects. In aggregate analyses, this is usually addressed by measuring distributional treatment effect (DTE) We provide a new robust and model-agnostic methodology for learning the conditional DTE (CDTE) for a wide class of problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-23T17:40:31Z)
• SurvITE: Learning Heterogeneous Treatment Effects from Time-to-Event Data [83.50281440043241]
  We study the problem of inferring heterogeneous treatment effects from time-to-event data. We propose a novel deep learning method for treatment-specific hazard estimation based on balancing representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-26T20:13:17Z)
• When in Doubt: Neural Non-Parametric Uncertainty Quantification for Epidemic Forecasting [70.54920804222031]
  Most existing forecasting models disregard uncertainty quantification, resulting in mis-calibrated predictions. Recent works in deep neural models for uncertainty-aware time-series forecasting also have several limitations. We model the forecasting task as a probabilistic generative process and propose a functional neural process model called EPIFNP.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T18:31:47Z)
• Increasing the efficiency of randomized trial estimates via linear adjustment for a prognostic score [59.75318183140857]
  Estimating causal effects from randomized experiments is central to clinical research. Most methods for historical borrowing achieve reductions in variance by sacrificing strict type-I error rate control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-17T21:10:10Z)
• Evaluating (weighted) dynamic treatment effects by double machine learning [0.12891210250935145]
  We consider evaluating the causal effects of dynamic treatments in a data-driven way under a selection-on-observables assumption. We make use of so-called Neyman-orthogonal score functions, which imply the robustness of treatment effect estimation to moderate (local) misspecifications. We demonstrate that the estimators are regularityally normal and $sqrtn$-consistent under specific conditions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-01T09:55:40Z)
• Learning Deep Features in Instrumental Variable Regression [42.085253974990046]
  In IV regression, learning proceeds in two stages: stage 1 performs linear regression from the instrument to the treatment; and stage 2 performs linear regression from the treatment to the outcome, conditioned on the instrument. We propose a novel method, deep feature instrumental variable regression (DFIV), to address the case where relations between instruments, treatments, and outcomes may be nonlinear.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-14T15:14:49Z)
• Enabling Counterfactual Survival Analysis with Balanced Representations [64.17342727357618]
  Survival data are frequently encountered across diverse medical applications, i.e., drug development, risk profiling, and clinical trials. We propose a theoretically grounded unified framework for counterfactual inference applicable to survival outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-14T01:15:00Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.