Technical Options for Flexible Hardware-Enabled Guarantees

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.03409v3
• Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 03:21:42 GMT
• Title: Technical Options for Flexible Hardware-Enabled Guarantees
• Authors: James Petrie, Onni Aarne,
• Abstract summary: We propose a system integrated with AI accelerator hardware to enable verifiable claims about compute usage in AI development.<n>The flexHEG system consists of two primary components: an auditable Guarantee Processor that monitors accelerator usage and verifies compliance with specified rules, and a Secure Enclosure that provides physical tamper protection.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Frontier AI models pose increasing risks to public safety and international security, creating a pressing need for AI developers to provide credible guarantees about their development activities without compromising proprietary information. We propose Flexible Hardware-Enabled Guarantees (flexHEG), a system integrated with AI accelerator hardware to enable verifiable claims about compute usage in AI development. The flexHEG system consists of two primary components: an auditable Guarantee Processor that monitors accelerator usage and verifies compliance with specified rules, and a Secure Enclosure that provides physical tamper protection. In this second report of a three part series, we analyze technical implementation options ranging from firmware modifications to custom hardware approaches, with focus on an "Interlock" design that provides the Guarantee Processor direct access to accelerator data paths. Our proposed architecture could support various guarantee types, from basic usage auditing to sophisticated automated verification. This work establishes technical foundations for hardware-based AI governance mechanisms that could address emerging regulatory and international security needs in frontier AI development.

Related papers

• International Security Applications of Flexible Hardware-Enabled Guarantees [0.0]
  flexHEGs could enable internationally trustworthy AI governance by establishing standardized designs, robust ecosystem defenses, and clear operational parameters for AI-relevant chips.<n>We analyze four critical international security applications: limiting proliferation to address malicious use, implementing safety norms to prevent loss of control, managing risks from military AI systems, and supporting strategic stability through balance-of-power mechanisms while respecting national sovereignty.<n>Report addresses critical implementation challenges including technical thresholds for AI-relevant chips, management of existing non-flexHEG hardware, and safeguards against abuse of governance power.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-18T03:10:49Z)
• Flexible Hardware-Enabled Guarantees for AI Compute [0.0]
  We propose flexible hardware-enabled guarantees (flexHEGs) to enable trustworthy, privacy-preserving verification and enforcement of claims about AI development.<n>flexHEGs consist of an auditable guarantee processor that monitors accelerator usage and a secure enclosure providing physical tamper protection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-18T03:04:44Z)
• Transformers for Secure Hardware Systems: Applications, Challenges, and Outlook [2.9625426098772425]
  Transformer models have gained traction in the security domain due to their ability to model complex dependencies.<n>This survey provides a review of recent advancements on the use of Transformers in hardware security.<n>It examines their application across key areas such as side-channel analysis, hardware Trojan detection, vulnerability classification, device fingerprinting, and firmware security.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-28T17:22:14Z)
• Hardware-Enabled Mechanisms for Verifying Responsible AI Development [17.536212903072105]
  Hardware-enabled mechanisms (HEMs) can support responsible AI development by enabling verifiable reporting of key properties of AI training activities.<n>Such tools can promote transparency and improve security, while addressing privacy and intellectual property concerns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-02T22:23:39Z)
• In-House Evaluation Is Not Enough: Towards Robust Third-Party Flaw Disclosure for General-Purpose AI [93.33036653316591]
  We call for three interventions to advance system safety.<n>First, we propose using standardized AI flaw reports and rules of engagement for researchers.<n>Second, we propose GPAI system providers adopt broadly-scoped flaw disclosure programs.<n>Third, we advocate for the development of improved infrastructure to coordinate distribution of flaw reports.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-21T05:09:46Z)
• ACRIC: Securing Legacy Communication Networks via Authenticated Cyclic Redundancy Integrity Check [98.34702864029796]
  Recent security incidents in safety-critical industries exposed how the lack of proper message authentication enables attackers to inject malicious commands or alter system behavior.<n>These shortcomings have prompted new regulations that emphasize the pressing need to strengthen cybersecurity.<n>We introduce ACRIC, a message authentication solution to secure legacy industrial communications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-21T18:26:05Z)
• Towards Guaranteed Safe AI: A Framework for Ensuring Robust and Reliable AI Systems [88.80306881112313]
  We will introduce and define a family of approaches to AI safety, which we will refer to as guaranteed safe (GS) AI. The core feature of these approaches is that they aim to produce AI systems which are equipped with high-assurance quantitative safety guarantees. We outline a number of approaches for creating each of these three core components, describe the main technical challenges, and suggest a number of potential solutions to them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-10T17:38:32Z)
• Enhancing Physical Layer Communication Security through Generative AI with Mixture of Experts [80.0638227807621]
  generative artificial intelligence (GAI) models have demonstrated superiority over conventional AI methods. MoE, which uses multiple expert models for prediction through a gate mechanism, proposes possible solutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-07T11:13:17Z)
• Secure Instruction and Data-Level Information Flow Tracking Model for RISC-V [0.0]
  Unauthorized access, fault injection, and privacy invasion are potential threats from untrusted actors. We propose an integrated Information Flow Tracking (IFT) technique to enable runtime security to protect system integrity. This study proposes a multi-level IFT model that integrates a hardware-based IFT technique with a gate-level-based IFT (GLIFT) technique.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-17T02:04:07Z)
• DASICS: Enhancing Memory Protection with Dynamic Compartmentalization [7.802648283305372]
  We present the DASICS (Dynamic in-Address-Space Isolation by Code Segments) secure processor design. It offers dynamic and flexible security protection across multiple privilege levels, addressing data flow protection, control flow protection, and secure system calls. We have implemented hardware FPGA prototypes and software QEMU simulator prototypes based on DASICS, along with necessary modifications to system software for adaptability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-10T09:05:29Z)
• A Model Based Framework for Testing Safety and Security in Operational Technology Environments [0.46040036610482665]
  We propose a model-based testing approach which we consider a promising way to analyze the safety and security behavior of a system under test. The structure of the underlying framework is divided into four parts, according to the critical factors in testing of operational technology environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-22T05:37:09Z)
• VEDLIoT -- Next generation accelerated AIoT systems and applications [4.964750143168832]
  The VEDLIoT project aims to develop energy-efficient Deep Learning methodologies for distributed Artificial Intelligence of Things (AIoT) applications. We propose a holistic approach that focuses on optimizing algorithms while addressing safety and security challenges inherent to AIoT systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-09T12:35:00Z)
• Trustworthy AI Inference Systems: An Industry Research View [58.000323504158054]
  We provide an industry research view for approaching the design, deployment, and operation of trustworthy AI inference systems. We highlight opportunities and challenges in AI systems using trusted execution environments. We outline areas of further development that require the global collective attention of industry, academia, and government researchers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-10T23:05:55Z)
• Toward Trustworthy AI Development: Mechanisms for Supporting Verifiable Claims [59.64274607533249]
  AI developers need to make verifiable claims to which they can be held accountable. This report suggests various steps that different stakeholders can take to improve the verifiability of claims made about AI systems. We analyze ten mechanisms for this purpose--spanning institutions, software, and hardware--and make recommendations aimed at implementing, exploring, or improving those mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-15T17:15:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.