Early linguistic fingerprints of online users who engage with conspiracy communities

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.05086v1
• Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2025 14:33:40 GMT
• Title: Early linguistic fingerprints of online users who engage with conspiracy communities
• Authors: Francesco Corso, Giuseppe Russo, Francesco Pierri, Gianmarco De Francisci Morales,
• Abstract summary: We study the psycholinguistic patterns of Reddit users who become active in a prominent conspiracy community.<n>We find that conspiracy-engaged individuals exhibit distinct psycholinguistic fingerprints, setting them apart from the general user population.
• Score: 3.816108682565106
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Online social media platforms are often seen as catalysts for radicalization, as they provide spaces where extreme beliefs can take root and spread, sometimes leading to real-world consequences. Conspiracy theories represent a specific form of radicalization that is notoriously resistant to online moderation strategies. One explanation for this resilience is the presence of a "conspiratorial mindset", a cognitive framework that fundamentally shapes how conspiracy believers perceive reality. However, the role of this mindset in driving online user behavior remains poorly understood. In this study, we analyze the psycholinguistic patterns of Reddit users who become active in a prominent conspiracy community by examining their activity in mainstream communities, which allows us to isolate linguistic markers for the presence of a conspiratorial mindset. We find that conspiracy-engaged individuals exhibit distinct psycholinguistic fingerprints, setting them apart from the general user population. Crucially, this signal is already evident in their online activity prior to joining the conspiracy community, allowing us to predict their involvement years in advance. These findings suggest that individuals who adopt conspiracy beliefs do not radicalize through community involvement, but possess a pre-existing conspiratorial mindset, which predisposes them to seek out and join extreme communities. By challenging the view that online social media platforms actively radicalize users into conspiracy theory beliefs, our findings suggest that standard moderation strategies have limited impact on curbing radicalization, and highlight the need for more targeted, supportive interventions that encourage disengagement from extremist narratives. Ultimately, this work contributes to fostering safer online and offline environments for public discourse.

Related papers

• Community Moderation and the New Epistemology of Fact Checking on Social Media [124.26693978503339]
  Social media platforms have traditionally relied on independent fact-checking organizations to identify and flag misleading content.<n>X (formerly Twitter) and Meta have shifted towards community-driven content moderation by launching their own versions of crowd-sourced fact-checking.<n>We examine the current approaches to misinformation detection across major platforms, explore the emerging role of community-driven moderation, and critically evaluate both the promises and challenges of crowd-checking at scale.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T14:50:18Z)
• Unveiling Online Conspiracy Theorists: a Text-Based Approach and Characterization [42.242551342068374]
  We conducted a comprehensive analysis of two distinct X datasets: one comprising users with conspiracy theorizing patterns and another made of users lacking such tendencies. Our findings reveal marked differences in the lexicon and language adopted by conspiracy theorists with respect to other users. We developed a machine learning classifier capable of identifying users who propagate conspiracy theories based on a rich set of 871 features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-21T08:07:38Z)
• Classifying Conspiratorial Narratives At Scale: False Alarms and Erroneous Connections [4.594855794205588]
  This work establishes a general scheme for classifying discussions related to conspiracy theories. We leverage human-labeled ground truth to train a BERT-based model for classifying online CTs. We present the first large-scale classification study using posts from the most active conspiracy-related Reddit forums.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-29T20:29:12Z)
• Disinformation Echo-Chambers on Facebook [0.27195102129095]
  This chapter introduces a computational method designed to identify coordinated inauthentic behavior within Facebook groups. The method focuses on analyzing posts, URLs, and images, revealing that certain Facebook groups engage in orchestrated campaigns. These groups simultaneously share identical content, which may expose users to repeated encounters with false or misleading narratives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-14T14:33:16Z)
• Pathways through Conspiracy: The Evolution of Conspiracy Radicalization through Engagement in Online Conspiracy Discussions [9.410583483182657]
  This paper provides the empirical modeling of various radicalization phases in online conspiracy theory discussion participants. By studying 36K users through their 169M contributions, we uncover four distinct pathways of conspiracy engagement. Specific sub-populations of users, namely those on steady high and increasing conspiracy engagement pathways, progress successively through various radicalization stages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-22T14:31:53Z)
• Where the Earth is flat and 9/11 is an inside job: A comparative algorithm audit of conspiratorial information in web search results [62.997667081978825]
  We examine the distribution of conspiratorial information in search results across five search engines: Google, Bing, DuckDuckGo, Yahoo and Yandex. We find that all search engines except Google consistently displayed conspiracy-promoting results and returned links to conspiracy-dedicated websites in their top results. Most conspiracy-promoting results came from social media and conspiracy-dedicated websites while conspiracy-debunking information was shared by scientific websites and, to a lesser extent, legacy media.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-02T14:29:21Z)
• Characterizing Social Imaginaries and Self-Disclosures of Dissonance in Online Conspiracy Discussion Communities [8.680081568962997]
  This paper characterizes self-disclosures of dissonance about QAnon, a conspiracy theory initiated by a mysterious leader Q. We focus on 2K posts from two image boards, 4chan and 8chan, and 1.2 M comments and posts from 12 subreddits dedicated to QAnon. We find that self-disclosures of dissonance correlate with a significant decrease in user contributions and ultimately with their departure from the community.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-21T16:49:21Z)
• Fragments of the Past: Curating Peer Support with Perpetrators of Domestic Violence [88.37416552778178]
  We report on a ten-month study where we worked with six support workers and eighteen perpetrators in the design and deployment of Fragments of the Past. We share how crafting digitally-augmented artefacts - 'fragments' - of experiences of desisting from violence can translate messages for motivation and rapport between peers. These insights provide the basis for practical considerations for future network design with challenging populations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-09T22:57:43Z)
• Is radicalization reinforced by social media censorship? [0.0]
  Radicalized beliefs, such as those tied to QAnon, Russiagate, and other political conspiracy theories, can lead some individuals and groups to engage in violent behavior. This article presents and agent-based model of a social media network that enables investigation of the effects of censorship on the amount of dissenting information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-23T21:07:34Z)
• The Truth is Out There: Investigating Conspiracy Theories in Text Generation [66.01545519772527]
  We investigate the propensity for language models to generate conspiracy theory text. Our study focuses on testing these models for the elicitation of conspiracy theories. We introduce a new dataset consisting of conspiracy theory topics, machine-generated conspiracy theories, and human-written conspiracy theories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-02T05:47:39Z)
• Quantifying the Vulnerabilities of the Online Public Square to Adversarial Manipulation Tactics [43.98568073610101]
  We use a social media model to quantify the impacts of several adversarial manipulation tactics on the quality of content. We find that the presence of influential accounts, a hallmark of social media, exacerbates the vulnerabilities of online communities to manipulation. These insights suggest countermeasures that platforms could employ to increase the resilience of social media users to manipulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2019-07-13T21:12:08Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.