FinanceReasoning: Benchmarking Financial Numerical Reasoning More Credible, Comprehensive and Challenging

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.05828v2
• Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2025 17:19:50 GMT
• Title: FinanceReasoning: Benchmarking Financial Numerical Reasoning More Credible, Comprehensive and Challenging
• Abstract summary: FinanceReasoning is a novel benchmark designed to evaluate the reasoning capabilities of large reasoning models (LRMs) in financial numerical reasoning problems.<n>We update 15.6% of the questions from four public datasets, annotating 908 new questions with detailed Python solutions.<n>We construct 3,133 Python-formatted functions, which enhances LRMs' financial reasoning capabilities.
• Score: 10.175739273593985
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We introduce FinanceReasoning, a novel benchmark designed to evaluate the reasoning capabilities of large reasoning models (LRMs) in financial numerical reasoning problems. Compared to existing benchmarks, our work provides three key advancements. (1) Credibility: We update 15.6% of the questions from four public datasets, annotating 908 new questions with detailed Python solutions and rigorously refining evaluation standards. This enables an accurate assessment of the reasoning improvements of LRMs. (2) Comprehensiveness: FinanceReasoning covers 67.8% of financial concepts and formulas, significantly surpassing existing datasets. Additionally, we construct 3,133 Python-formatted functions, which enhances LRMs' financial reasoning capabilities through refined knowledge (e.g., 83.2% $\rightarrow$ 91.6% for GPT-4o). (3) Challenge: Models are required to apply multiple financial formulas for precise numerical reasoning on 238 Hard problems. The best-performing model (i.e., OpenAI o1 with PoT) achieves 89.1% accuracy, yet LRMs still face challenges in numerical precision. We demonstrate that combining Reasoner and Programmer models can effectively enhance LRMs' performance (e.g., 83.2% $\rightarrow$ 87.8% for DeepSeek-R1). Our work paves the way for future research on evaluating and improving LRMs in domain-specific complex reasoning tasks.

Related papers

• Agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Financial Document Question Answering [7.56842616602779]
  FinAgent-RAG is an agentic RAG framework that orchestrates iterative retrieval-reasoning loops with self-verification.<n>It integrates a Contrastive Financial Retriever trained with hard negative mining to distinguish semantically similar but numerically distinct financial passages.<n>It achieves 76.81%, 78.46%, and 74.96% execution accuracy respectively, outperforming the strongest baseline by 5.62--9.32 percentage points.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-06T19:59:51Z)
• GR-Ben: A General Reasoning Benchmark for Evaluating Process Reward Models [55.56903314809719]
  We introduce GR-Ben, a process-level benchmark specifically designed for assessing PRM's performance across two primary reasoning domains (science and logic) and nine others.<n>In domains beyond mathematical reasoning, the error-detection ability of existing PRMs and LLMs is found to be markedly weaker by comparison.<n>In general, PRMs are less adept at identifying knowledge-based errors, whereas LLMs exhibit poorer performance in detecting computational errors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-02T02:41:48Z)
• Budget-Aware Anytime Reasoning with LLM-Synthesized Preference Data [57.996437077411315]
  We study the reasoning behavior of large language models (LLMs) under limited computation budgets.<n>We introduce an anytime reasoning framework and the Anytime Index, a metric that quantifies how effectively solution quality improves as reasoning tokens increase.<n> Experiments on NaturalPlan (Trip), AIME, and GPQA datasets show consistent gains across Grok-3, GPT-oss, GPT-4.1/4o, and LLaMA models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-16T07:09:30Z)
• FinLFQA: Evaluating Attributed Text Generation of LLMs in Financial Long-Form Question Answering [57.43420753842626]
  FinLFQA is a benchmark designed to evaluate the ability of Large Language Models to generate long-form answers to complex financial questions.<n>We provide an automatic evaluation framework covering both answer quality and attribution quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-07T20:06:15Z)
• XFinBench: Benchmarking LLMs in Complex Financial Problem Solving and Reasoning [28.967959142733903]
  We introduce XFinBench, a novel benchmark to evaluate large language models' ability in solving financial problems.<n>O1 is the best-performing text-only model with an overall accuracy of 67.3%, but still lags significantly behind human experts with 12.5%.<n>We construct a knowledge bank with 3,032 finance terms for knowledge augmentation analysis, and find that relevant knowledge only brings consistent accuracy improvements to small open-source model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-20T15:23:35Z)
• Agentar-Fin-R1: Enhancing Financial Intelligence through Domain Expertise, Training Efficiency, and Advanced Reasoning [12.548390779247987]
  We introduce the Agentar-Fin-R1 series of financial large language models.<n>Our optimization approach integrates a high-quality, systematic financial task label system.<n>Our models undergo comprehensive evaluation on mainstream financial benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-22T17:52:16Z)
• BizFinBench: A Business-Driven Real-World Financial Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs [7.9458352414205295]
  Large language models excel in general tasks, yet assessing their reliability in logic-heavy, precision-critical domains like finance, law, and healthcare remains challenging.<n>We introduce BizFinBench, the first benchmark specifically designed to evaluate LLMs in real-world financial applications.<n> BizFinBench consists of 6,781 well-annotated queries in Chinese, spanning five dimensions: numerical calculation, reasoning, information extraction, prediction recognition, and knowledge-based question answering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T03:23:02Z)
• VeriThinker: Learning to Verify Makes Reasoning Model Efficient [52.74493506816969]
  Large Reasoning Models excel at complex tasks using Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning.<n>Their tendency to overthinking leads to unnecessarily lengthy reasoning chains.<n>We introduce VeriThinker, a novel approach for CoT compression.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-23T14:17:56Z)
• FinMaster: A Holistic Benchmark for Mastering Full-Pipeline Financial Workflows with LLMs [15.230256296815565]
  FinMaster is a benchmark designed to assess the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) in financial literacy, accounting, auditing, and consulting.<n>FinMaster comprises three main modules: FinSim, FinSuite, and FinEval.<n>Experiments reveal critical capability gaps in financial reasoning, with accuracy dropping from over 90% on basic tasks to merely 37% on complex scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-18T11:47:55Z)
• DianJin-R1: Evaluating and Enhancing Financial Reasoning in Large Language Models [13.567516575993546]
  We propose DianJin-R1, a reasoning-enhanced framework for large language models (LLMs) in the financial domain.<n>Central to our approach is DianJin-R1-Data, a high-quality dataset constructed from CFLUE, FinQA, and a proprietary compliance corpus (Chinese Compliance Check, CCC)<n>Our models, DianJin-R1-7B and DianJin-R1-32B, are fine-tuned from Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct and Qwen2.5-32B-Instruct using a structured format that generates both reasoning steps and final answers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-22T09:01:04Z)
• Nemotron-CrossThink: Scaling Self-Learning beyond Math Reasoning [66.43194385702297]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown strong reasoning capabilities, particularly when enhanced through Reinforcement Learning (RL)<n>We propose NEMOTRON-CROSSTHINK, a framework that systematically incorporates multi-domain corpora, including both synthetic and real-world question-answer pairs, into RL training to improve generalization across diverse reasoning tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-15T21:37:13Z)
• R-PRM: Reasoning-Driven Process Reward Modeling [53.06844294668382]
  Process Reward Models (PRMs) have emerged as a promising solution by evaluating each reasoning step.<n>Existing PRMs typically output evaluation scores directly, limiting both learning efficiency and evaluation accuracy.<n>We propose Reasoning-Driven Process Reward Modeling (R-PRM)<n>R-PRM generates seed data from limited annotations, effectively bootstrapping our model's reasoning capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-27T09:23:08Z)
• Trade-offs in Large Reasoning Models: An Empirical Analysis of Deliberative and Adaptive Reasoning over Foundational Capabilities [101.77467538102924]
  Recent advancements in Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance in specialized reasoning tasks.<n>We show that acquiring deliberative reasoning capabilities significantly reduces the foundational capabilities of LRMs.<n>We demonstrate that adaptive reasoning -- employing modes like Zero-Thinking, Less-Thinking, and Summary-Thinking -- can effectively alleviate these drawbacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-23T08:18:51Z)
• START: Self-taught Reasoner with Tools [51.38785489790888]
  We introduce START (Self-Taught Reasoner with Tools), a tool-integrated long Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning LLM.<n> START is capable of performing complex computations, self-checking, exploring diverse methods, and self-ging.<n>It significantly outperforms the base QwQ-32B and achieves performance comparable to the state-of-the-art open-weight model R1-Distill-Qwen-32B.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-06T17:11:51Z)
• Fino1: On the Transferability of Reasoning Enhanced LLMs to Finance [32.516564836540745]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown strong general reasoning capabilities, but their effectiveness in financial reasoning remains underexplored.<n>We evaluate 24 state-of-the-art general and reasoning-focused LLMs across four complex financial reasoning tasks.<n>We propose two domain-adapted models, Fino1-8B and FinoB, trained with chain-of-thought (CoT) fine-tuning and reinforcement learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-12T05:13:04Z)
• FinBen: A Holistic Financial Benchmark for Large Language Models [75.09474986283394]
  FinBen is the first extensive open-source evaluation benchmark, including 36 datasets spanning 24 financial tasks. FinBen offers several key innovations: a broader range of tasks and datasets, the first evaluation of stock trading, novel agent and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) evaluation, and three novel open-source evaluation datasets for text summarization, question answering, and stock trading.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T02:16:16Z)
• FinQA: A Dataset of Numerical Reasoning over Financial Data [52.7249610894623]
  We focus on answering deep questions over financial data, aiming to automate the analysis of a large corpus of financial documents. We propose a new large-scale dataset, FinQA, with Question-Answering pairs over Financial reports, written by financial experts. The results demonstrate that popular, large, pre-trained models fall far short of expert humans in acquiring finance knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-01T00:08:14Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.