Where Journalism Silenced Voices: Exploring Discrimination in the Representation of Indigenous Communities in Bangladesh

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.09771v1
• Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 14:10:39 GMT
• Title: Where Journalism Silenced Voices: Exploring Discrimination in the Representation of Indigenous Communities in Bangladesh
• Authors: Abhijit Paul, Adity Khisa, Zarif Masud, Sharif Md. Abdullah, Ahmedul Kabir, Shebuti Rayana,
• Abstract summary: We identify 4,893 indigenous-related articles from our initial dataset of 2.2 million newspaper articles.<n>Results show indigenous news articles have higher representation of culture and entertainment.<n>Participants unanimously expressed their feeling of being under-represented.
• Score: 0.02199065293049185
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: In this paper, we examine the intersections of indigeneity and media representation in shaping perceptions of indigenous communities in Bangladesh. Using a mixed-methods approach, we combine quantitative analysis of media data with qualitative insights from focus group discussions (FGD). First, we identify a total of 4,893 indigenous-related articles from our initial dataset of 2.2 million newspaper articles, using a combination of keyword-based filtering and LLM, achieving 77% accuracy and an F1-score of 81.9\%. From manually inspecting 3 prominent Bangla newspapers, we identify 15 genres that we use as our topics for semi-supervised topic modeling using CorEx. Results show indigenous news articles have higher representation of culture and entertainment (19%, 10% higher than general news articles), and a disproportionate focus on conflict and protest (9%, 7% higher than general news). On the other hand, sentiment analysis reveals that 57% of articles on indigenous topics carry a negative tone, compared to 27% for non-indigenous related news. Drawing from communication studies, we further analyze framing, priming, and agenda-setting (frequency of themes) to support the case for discrimination in representation of indigenous news coverage. For the qualitative part of our analysis, we facilitated FGD, where participants further validated these findings. Participants unanimously expressed their feeling of being under-represented, and that critical issues affecting their communities (such as education, healthcare, and land rights) are systematically marginalized in news media coverage. By highlighting 8 cases of discrimination and media misrepresentation that were frequently mentioned by participants in the FGD, this study emphasizes the urgent need for more equitable media practices that accurately reflect the experiences and struggles of marginalized communities.

Related papers

• Read Between the Lines: A Benchmark for Uncovering Political Bias in Bangla News Articles [0.0]
  Political stance detection in Bangla news requires understanding of linguistic cues, cultural context, subtle biases, rhetorical strategies, code-switching, implicit sentiment, and socio-political background.<n>We introduce the first benchmark dataset of 200 politically significant and highly debated Bangla news articles, labeled for government-leaning, government-critique, and neutral stances, alongside diagnostic analyses for evaluating large language models (LLMs)<n>Our evaluation of 28 proprietary and open-source LLMs shows strong performance in detecting government-critique content (F1 up to 0.83) but substantial difficulty with neutral articles (F1 as low as 0.00)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-04T18:34:34Z)
• FairI Tales: Evaluation of Fairness in Indian Contexts with a Focus on Bias and Stereotypes [23.71105683137539]
  Existing studies on fairness are largely Western-focused, making them inadequate for culturally diverse countries such as India.<n>We introduce INDIC-BIAS, a comprehensive India-centric benchmark designed to evaluate fairness of LLMs across 85 socio identity groups.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-29T06:31:06Z)
• Position: AI/ML Influencers Have a Place in the Academic Process [82.2069685579588]
  We investigate the role of social media influencers in enhancing the visibility of machine learning research. We have compiled a comprehensive dataset of over 8,000 papers, spanning tweets from December 2018 to October 2023. Our statistical and causal inference analysis reveals a significant increase in citations for papers endorsed by these influencers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-24T20:05:49Z)
• Understanding Divergent Framing of the Supreme Court Controversies: Social Media vs. News Outlets [56.67097829383139]
  We focus on the nuanced distinctions in framing of social media and traditional media outlets concerning a series of U.S. Supreme Court rulings. We observe significant polarization in the news media's treatment of affirmative action and abortion rights, whereas the topic of student loans tends to exhibit a greater degree of consensus.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-18T06:40:21Z)
• Towards Corpus-Scale Discovery of Selection Biases in News Coverage: Comparing What Sources Say About Entities as a Start [65.28355014154549]
  This paper investigates the challenges of building scalable NLP systems for discovering patterns of media selection biases directly from news content in massive-scale news corpora. We show the capabilities of the framework through a case study on NELA-2020, a corpus of 1.8M news articles in English from 519 news sources worldwide.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-06T23:36:45Z)
• Bias or Diversity? Unraveling Fine-Grained Thematic Discrepancy in U.S. News Headlines [63.52264764099532]
  We use a large dataset of 1.8 million news headlines from major U.S. media outlets spanning from 2014 to 2022. We quantify the fine-grained thematic discrepancy related to four prominent topics - domestic politics, economic issues, social issues, and foreign affairs. Our findings indicate that on domestic politics and social issues, the discrepancy can be attributed to a certain degree of media bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-28T03:31:37Z)
• Computational Assessment of Hyperpartisanship in News Titles [55.92100606666497]
  We first adopt a human-guided machine learning framework to develop a new dataset for hyperpartisan news title detection. Overall the Right media tends to use proportionally more hyperpartisan titles. We identify three major topics including foreign issues, political systems, and societal issues that are suggestive of hyperpartisanship in news titles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-16T05:56:58Z)
• Unveiling the Hidden Agenda: Biases in News Reporting and Consumption [59.55900146668931]
  We build a six-year dataset on the Italian vaccine debate and adopt a Bayesian latent space model to identify narrative and selection biases. We found a nonlinear relationship between biases and engagement, with higher engagement for extreme positions. Analysis of news consumption on Twitter reveals common audiences among news outlets with similar ideological positions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-14T18:58:42Z)
• Newsalyze: Effective Communication of Person-Targeting Biases in News Articles [8.586057042714698]
  We present a system for bias identification, which combines state-of-the-art methods from natural language understanding. Second, we devise bias-sensitive visualizations to communicate bias in news articles to non-expert news consumers. Third, our main contribution is a large-scale user study that measures bias-awareness in a setting that approximates daily news consumption.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-18T10:23:19Z)
• Enabling News Consumers to View and Understand Biased News Coverage: A Study on the Perception and Visualization of Media Bias [7.092487352312782]
  We create three manually annotated datasets and test varying visualization strategies. Results show no strong effects of becoming aware of the bias of the treatment groups compared to the control group. Using a multilevel model, we find that perceived journalist bias is significantly related to perceived political extremeness and impartiality of the article.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-20T10:16:54Z)
• Analyzing Political Bias and Unfairness in News Articles at Different Levels of Granularity [35.19976910093135]
  The research presented in this paper addresses not only the automatic detection of bias but goes one step further in that it explores how political bias and unfairness are manifested linguistically. We utilize a new corpus of 6964 news articles with labels derived from adfontesmedia.com and develop a neural model for bias assessment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-20T22:25:00Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.