When Meaning Stays the Same, but Models Drift: Evaluating Quality of Service under Token-Level Behavioral Instability in LLMs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.10095v1
• Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 18:26:32 GMT
• Title: When Meaning Stays the Same, but Models Drift: Evaluating Quality of Service under Token-Level Behavioral Instability in LLMs
• Authors: Xiao Li, Joel Kreuzwieser, Alan Peters,
• Abstract summary: We investigate how large language models respond to prompts that differ only in their token-level realization but preserve the same semantic intent.<n>We propose Prompt-Based Semantic Shift (PBSS), a diagnostic framework for measuring behavioral drift in LLMs under semantically equivalent prompt rewordings.
• Score: 4.265831047857601
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: We investigate how large language models respond to prompts that differ only in their token-level realization but preserve the same semantic intent, a phenomenon we call prompt variance. We propose Prompt-Based Semantic Shift (PBSS), a diagnostic framework for measuring behavioral drift in LLMs under semantically equivalent prompt rewordings. Applied to ten constrained tasks, PBSS reveals consistent, model-specific response shifts, suggesting statistical regularities linked to tokenization and decoding. These results highlight an overlooked dimension of model evaluation stability under rephrasing and suggest that tokenization strategies and decoding dynamics may contribute to post-training quality of service instability.

Related papers

• Quantifying Fairness in LLMs Beyond Tokens: A Semantic and Statistical Perspective [13.739343897204568]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) often generate responses with inherent biases, undermining their reliability in real-world applications.<n>Existing evaluation methods often overlook biases in long-form responses and the intrinsic variability of LLM outputs.<n>We propose FiSco, a novel statistical framework to evaluate group-level fairness in LLMs by detecting subtle semantic differences in long-form responses across demographic groups.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-23T18:31:22Z)
• Chain-of-Code Collapse: Reasoning Failures in LLMs via Adversarial Prompting in Code Generation [0.3495246564946556]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success in tasks requiring complex reasoning.<n>Do these models truly reason, or do they merely exploit shallow statistical patterns?<n>We introduce Chain-of-Code Collapse, where we investigate the robustness of reasoning LLMs by introducing a suite of semantically faithful yet adversarially structured prompt perturbations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-08T02:43:46Z)
• Say It Another Way: Auditing LLMs with a User-Grounded Automated Paraphrasing Framework [9.162876771766513]
  We introduce AUGMENT, a framework for generating controlled, realistic prompt paraphrases based on linguistic structure and user demographics.<n>AUGMENT ensures paraphrase quality through a combination of semantic, stylistic, and instruction-following criteria.<n>Our findings highlight the need for more representative and structured approaches to prompt variation in large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-06T14:17:30Z)
• Towards Robust LLMs: an Adversarial Robustness Measurement Framework [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) remain vulnerable to adversarial perturbations, undermining their reliability in high-stakes applications.<n>We adapt the Robustness Measurement and Assessment framework to quantify LLM resilience against adversarial inputs without requiring access to model parameters.<n>Our work provides a systematic methodology to assess LLM robustness, advancing the development of more reliable language models for real-world deployment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-24T16:36:19Z)
• Model Hemorrhage and the Robustness Limits of Large Language Models [119.46442117681147]
  Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate strong performance across natural language processing tasks, yet undergo significant performance degradation when modified for deployment.<n>We define this phenomenon as model hemorrhage - performance decline caused by parameter alterations and architectural changes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-31T10:16:03Z)
• Estimating Commonsense Plausibility through Semantic Shifts [66.06254418551737]
  We propose ComPaSS, a novel discriminative framework that quantifies commonsense plausibility by measuring semantic shifts.<n> Evaluations on two types of fine-grained commonsense plausibility estimation tasks show that ComPaSS consistently outperforms baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-19T06:31:06Z)
• Bridging Interpretability and Robustness Using LIME-Guided Model Refinement [0.0]
  Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME) systematically enhance model robustness.<n> Empirical evaluations on multiple benchmark datasets demonstrate that LIME-guided refinement not only improves interpretability but also significantly enhances resistance to adversarial perturbations and generalization to out-of-distribution data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-25T17:32:45Z)
• Post-hoc Probabilistic Vision-Language Models [51.12284891724463]
  Vision-language models (VLMs) have found remarkable success in classification, retrieval, and generative tasks.<n>We propose post-hoc uncertainty estimation in VLMs that does not require additional training.<n>Our results show promise for safety-critical applications of large-scale models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-08T18:16:13Z)
• Sycophancy in Vision-Language Models: A Systematic Analysis and an Inference-Time Mitigation Framework [18.54098084470481]
  We analyze sycophancy across vision-language benchmarks and propose an inference-time mitigation framework.<n>Our framework effectively mitigates sycophancy across all evaluated models, while maintaining performance on neutral prompts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-21T01:03:21Z)
• Unconditional Truthfulness: Learning Conditional Dependency for Uncertainty Quantification of Large Language Models [96.43562963756975]
  We train a regression model, which target variable is the gap between the conditional and the unconditional generation confidence. We use this learned conditional dependency model to modulate the uncertainty of the current generation step based on the uncertainty of the previous step.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-20T09:42:26Z)
• Bring Your Own Data! Self-Supervised Evaluation for Large Language Models [52.15056231665816]
  We propose a framework for self-supervised evaluation of Large Language Models (LLMs) We demonstrate self-supervised evaluation strategies for measuring closed-book knowledge, toxicity, and long-range context dependence. We find strong correlations between self-supervised and human-supervised evaluations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-23T17:59:09Z)
• Stateful Offline Contextual Policy Evaluation and Learning [88.9134799076718]
  We study off-policy evaluation and learning from sequential data. We formalize the relevant causal structure of problems such as dynamic personalized pricing. We show improved out-of-sample policy performance in this class of relevant problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-19T16:15:56Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.