Med-PRM: Medical Reasoning Models with Stepwise, Guideline-verified Process Rewards

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.11474v1
• Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 05:36:30 GMT
• Title: Med-PRM: Medical Reasoning Models with Stepwise, Guideline-verified Process Rewards
• Authors: Jaehoon Yun, Jiwoong Sohn, Jungwoo Park, Hyunjae Kim, Xiangru Tang, Yanjun Shao, Yonghoe Koo, Minhyeok Ko, Qingyu Chen, Mark Gerstein, Michael Moor, Jaewoo Kang,
• Abstract summary: We introduce Med-PRM, a process reward modeling framework to verify each reasoning step against established medical knowledge bases.<n>Med-PRM achieves state-of-the-art performance, with improving the performance of base models by up to 13.50%.<n>We demonstrate the generality of Med-PRM by integrating it in a plug-and-play fashion with strong policy models such as Meerkat.
• Score: 21.831262938278915
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models have shown promise in clinical decision making, but current approaches struggle to localize and correct errors at specific steps of the reasoning process. This limitation is critical in medicine, where identifying and addressing reasoning errors is essential for accurate diagnosis and effective patient care. We introduce Med-PRM, a process reward modeling framework that leverages retrieval-augmented generation to verify each reasoning step against established medical knowledge bases. By verifying intermediate reasoning steps with evidence retrieved from clinical guidelines and literature, our model can precisely assess the reasoning quality in a fine-grained manner. Evaluations on five medical QA benchmarks and two open-ended diagnostic tasks demonstrate that Med-PRM achieves state-of-the-art performance, with improving the performance of base models by up to 13.50% using Med-PRM. Moreover, we demonstrate the generality of Med-PRM by integrating it in a plug-and-play fashion with strong policy models such as Meerkat, achieving over 80\% accuracy on MedQA for the first time using small-scale models of 8 billion parameters. Our code and data are available at: https://med-prm.github.io/

Related papers

• MedBLINK: Probing Basic Perception in Multimodal Language Models for Medicine [12.333678882957377]
  We introduce Medblink, a benchmark designed to probe these models for such perceptual abilities.<n>Medblink spans eight clinically meaningful tasks across multiple imaging modalities and anatomical regions, totaling 1,429 multiple-choice questions over 1,605 images.<n>While human annotators achieve 96.4% accuracy, the best-performing model reaches only 65%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-04T23:19:18Z)
• MedGemma Technical Report [75.88152277443179]
  We introduce MedGemma, a collection of medical vision-language foundation models based on Gemma 3 4B and 27B.<n>MedGemma demonstrates advanced medical understanding and reasoning on images and text.<n>We additionally introduce MedSigLIP, a medically-tuned vision encoder derived from SigLIP.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-07T17:01:44Z)
• ReasonMed: A 370K Multi-Agent Generated Dataset for Advancing Medical Reasoning [44.96018028534255]
  ReasonMed is the largest medical reasoning dataset, comprising 370k high-quality examples distilled from 1.7 million initial reasoning paths.<n>We train ReasonMed-7B, which sets a new benchmark for sub-10B models, outperforming the prior best by 4.17% and even exceeding LLaMA3.1-70B on PubMedQA by 4.60%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-11T08:36:55Z)
• MedCaseReasoning: Evaluating and learning diagnostic reasoning from clinical case reports [49.00805568780791]
  We introduce MedCaseReasoning, the first open-access dataset for evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) on their ability to align with clinician-authored diagnostic reasoning.<n>The dataset includes 14,489 diagnostic question-and-answer cases, each paired with detailed reasoning statements.<n>We evaluate state-of-the-art reasoning LLMs on MedCaseReasoning and find significant shortcomings in their diagnoses and reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-16T22:34:36Z)
• MedAgentsBench: Benchmarking Thinking Models and Agent Frameworks for Complex Medical Reasoning [34.93995619867384]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown impressive performance on existing medical question-answering benchmarks.<n>We present MedAgentsBench, a benchmark that focuses on challenging medical questions requiring multi-step clinical reasoning, diagnosis formulation, and treatment planning-scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-10T15:38:44Z)
• Structured Outputs Enable General-Purpose LLMs to be Medical Experts [50.02627258858336]
  Large language models (LLMs) often struggle with open-ended medical questions.<n>We propose a novel approach utilizing structured medical reasoning.<n>Our approach achieves the highest Factuality Score of 85.8, surpassing fine-tuned models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-05T05:24:55Z)
• MedS$^3$: Towards Medical Small Language Models with Self-Evolved Slow Thinking [31.265628928038335]
  We present a deployable, small-scale medical reasoning system, MedS3, designed for long-chain reasoning in clinical tasks.<n>We show that MedS3 outperforms the prior strongest medical model by 6.59, but also 32B-level general reasoning models by 8.71 points.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-21T11:24:55Z)
• Adapting LLMs for the Medical Domain in Portuguese: A Study on Fine-Tuning and Model Evaluation [1.922611370494431]
  This study evaluates the performance of large language models (LLMs) as medical agents in Portuguese. The InternLM2 model, with initial training on medical data, presented the best overall performance. DrBode models, derived from ChatBode, exhibited a phenomenon of catastrophic forgetting of acquired medical knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-30T19:10:03Z)
• Towards Evaluating and Building Versatile Large Language Models for Medicine [57.49547766838095]
  We present MedS-Bench, a benchmark designed to evaluate the performance of large language models (LLMs) in clinical contexts. MedS-Bench spans 11 high-level clinical tasks, including clinical report summarization, treatment recommendations, diagnosis, named entity recognition, and medical concept explanation. MedS-Ins comprises 58 medically oriented language corpora, totaling 13.5 million samples across 122 tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-22T17:01:34Z)
• Capabilities of Gemini Models in Medicine [100.60391771032887]
  We introduce Med-Gemini, a family of highly capable multimodal models specialized in medicine. We evaluate Med-Gemini on 14 medical benchmarks, establishing new state-of-the-art (SoTA) performance on 10 of them. Our results offer compelling evidence for Med-Gemini's potential, although further rigorous evaluation will be crucial before real-world deployment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-29T04:11:28Z)
• A Spectrum Evaluation Benchmark for Medical Multi-Modal Large Language Models [57.88111980149541]
  We introduce Asclepius, a novel Med-MLLM benchmark that assesses Med-MLLMs in terms of distinct medical specialties and different diagnostic capacities.<n>Grounded in 3 proposed core principles, Asclepius ensures a comprehensive evaluation by encompassing 15 medical specialties.<n>We also provide an in-depth analysis of 6 Med-MLLMs and compare them with 3 human specialists.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-17T08:04:23Z)
• Large Language Models Encode Clinical Knowledge [21.630872464930587]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in natural language understanding and generation. We propose a framework for human evaluation of model answers along multiple axes including factuality, precision, possible harm, and bias. We show that comprehension, recall of knowledge, and medical reasoning improve with model scale and instruction prompt tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-26T14:28:24Z)
• Semi-Supervised Variational Reasoning for Medical Dialogue Generation [70.838542865384]
  Two key characteristics are relevant for medical dialogue generation: patient states and physician actions. We propose an end-to-end variational reasoning approach to medical dialogue generation. A physician policy network composed of an action-classifier and two reasoning detectors is proposed for augmented reasoning ability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-13T04:14:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.