Open Source, Open Threats? Investigating Security Challenges in Open-Source Software

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.12995v1
• Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2025 23:22:25 GMT
• Title: Open Source, Open Threats? Investigating Security Challenges in Open-Source Software
• Authors: Seyed Ali Akhavani, Behzad Ousat, Amin Kharraz,
• Abstract summary: Open-source software (OSS) has become increasingly more popular across different domains.<n>This paper investigates the trends and patterns of reported vulnerabilities within OSS platforms.
• Score: 0.7810572107832383
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Open-source software (OSS) has become increasingly more popular across different domains. However, this rapid development and widespread adoption come with a security cost. The growing complexity and openness of OSS ecosystems have led to increased exposure to vulnerabilities and attack surfaces. This paper investigates the trends and patterns of reported vulnerabilities within OSS platforms, focusing on the implications of these findings for security practices. To understand the dynamics of OSS vulnerabilities, we analyze a comprehensive dataset comprising 31,267 unique vulnerability reports from GitHub's advisory database and Snyk.io, belonging to 14,675 packages across 10 programming languages. Our analysis reveals a significant surge in reported vulnerabilities, increasing at an annual rate of 98%, far outpacing the 25% average annual growth in the number of open-source software (OSS) packages. Additionally, we observe an 85% increase in the average lifespan of vulnerabilities across ecosystems during the studied period, indicating a potential decline in security. We identify the most prevalent Common Weakness Enumerations (CWEs) across programming languages and find that, on average, just seven CWEs are responsible for over 50% of all reported vulnerabilities. We further examine these commonly observed CWEs and highlight ecosystem-specific trends. Notably, we find that vulnerabilities associated with intentionally malicious packages comprise 49% of reports in the NPM ecosystem and 14% in PyPI, an alarming indication of targeted attacks within package repositories. We conclude with an in-depth discussion of the characteristics and attack vectors associated with these malicious packages.

Related papers

• PoCGen: Generating Proof-of-Concept Exploits for Vulnerabilities in Npm Packages [16.130469984234956]
  PoCGen is a novel approach to autonomously generate and validate PoC exploits for vulnerabilities in npm packages.<n>This is the first fully autonomous approach to use large language models (LLMs) in tandem with static and dynamic analysis techniques for PoC exploit generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-05T12:37:33Z)
• CyberGym: Evaluating AI Agents' Cybersecurity Capabilities with Real-World Vulnerabilities at Scale [46.76144797837242]
  Large language model (LLM) agents are becoming increasingly skilled at handling cybersecurity tasks autonomously.<n>Existing benchmarks fall short, often failing to capture real-world scenarios or being limited in scope.<n>We introduce CyberGym, a large-scale and high-quality cybersecurity evaluation framework featuring 1,507 real-world vulnerabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-03T07:35:14Z)
• Eradicating the Unseen: Detecting, Exploiting, and Remediating a Path Traversal Vulnerability across GitHub [1.2124551005857036]
  Vulnerabilities in open-source software can cause cascading effects in the modern digital ecosystem.<n>We identified 1,756 vulnerable open-source projects, some of which are very influential.<n>We have responsibly disclosed the vulnerability to the maintainers, and 14% of the reported vulnerabilities have been remediated.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T16:29:21Z)
• S3C2 Summit 2024-09: Industry Secure Software Supply Chain Summit [50.93790634176803]
  Over the past several years, there has been an exponential increase in cyberattacks targeting software supply chains.<n>The ever-evolving threat of software supply chain attacks has garnered interest from the software industry and the US government.<n>Three researchers from the NSF-backed Secure Software Supply Chain Center (S3C2) conducted a Secure Software Supply Chain Summit with a diverse set of 12 practitioners from 9 companies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-15T17:48:14Z)
• The Ripple Effect of Vulnerabilities in Maven Central: Prevalence, Propagation, and Mitigation Challenges [8.955037553566774]
  We analyze the prevalence and impact of vulnerabilities within the Maven Central ecosystem using Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures data.<n>In our subsample of around 4 million releases, we found that while only about 1% of releases have direct vulnerabilities.<n>We also observed that the time taken to patch vulnerabilities, including those of high or critical severity, often spans several years.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-05T13:45:27Z)
• SoK: Understanding Vulnerabilities in the Large Language Model Supply Chain [8.581429744090316]
  This study systematically analyzes 529 vulnerabilities reported across 75 prominent projects spanning 13 lifecycle stages.<n>The findings show that vulnerabilities are concentrated in the application (50.3%) and model (42.7%) layers.<n>While 56.7% of the vulnerabilities have available fixes, 8% of these patches are ineffective, resulting in recurring vulnerabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-18T03:22:38Z)
• Investigating Vulnerability Disclosures in Open-Source Software Using Bug Bounty Reports and Security Advisories [6.814841205623832]
  We conduct an empirical study on 3,798 reviewed GitHub security advisories and 4,033 disclosed OSS bug bounty reports.<n>We are the first to determine the explicit process describing how OSS vulnerabilities propagate from security advisories and bug bounty reports.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-29T16:36:41Z)
• Discovery of Timeline and Crowd Reaction of Software Vulnerability Disclosures [47.435076500269545]
  Apache Log4J was found to be vulnerable to remote code execution attacks. More than 35,000 packages were forced to update their Log4J libraries with the latest version. It is practically reasonable for software developers to update their third-party libraries whenever the software vendors have released a vulnerable-free version.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-12T01:55:51Z)
• The Impact of SBOM Generators on Vulnerability Assessment in Python: A Comparison and a Novel Approach [56.4040698609393]
  Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) has been promoted as a tool to increase transparency and verifiability in software composition. Current SBOM generation tools often suffer from inaccuracies in identifying components and dependencies. We propose PIP-sbom, a novel pip-inspired solution that addresses their shortcomings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-10T10:12:37Z)
• ThreatKG: An AI-Powered System for Automated Open-Source Cyber Threat Intelligence Gathering and Management [65.0114141380651]
  ThreatKG is an automated system for OSCTI gathering and management. It efficiently collects a large number of OSCTI reports from multiple sources. It uses specialized AI-based techniques to extract high-quality knowledge about various threat entities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-20T16:13:59Z)
• VELVET: a noVel Ensemble Learning approach to automatically locate VulnErable sTatements [62.93814803258067]
  This paper presents VELVET, a novel ensemble learning approach to locate vulnerable statements in source code. Our model combines graph-based and sequence-based neural networks to successfully capture the local and global context of a program graph. VELVET achieves 99.6% and 43.6% top-1 accuracy over synthetic data and real-world data, respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-20T22:45:27Z)
• A System for Automated Open-Source Threat Intelligence Gathering and Management [53.65687495231605]
  SecurityKG is a system for automated OSCTI gathering and management. It uses a combination of AI and NLP techniques to extract high-fidelity knowledge about threat behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-19T18:31:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.