Med-REFL: Medical Reasoning Enhancement via Self-Corrected Fine-grained Reflection

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.13793v2
• Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 14:33:59 GMT
• Title: Med-REFL: Medical Reasoning Enhancement via Self-Corrected Fine-grained Reflection
• Authors: Zongxian Yang, Jiayu Qian, Zegao Peng, Haoyu Zhang, Zhi-An Huang,
• Abstract summary: We propose Med-REFL, a underlinetextbfMedical underlinetextbfReasoning underlinetextbfEnhancement via self-corrected underlinetextbfFine-grained refunderlinetextbfLection.<n>Our method leverages a tree-of-thought approach to decompose medical questions into fine-grained reasoning paths, quantitatively evaluating each step and its subsequent reflections.
• Score: 7.584796006142439
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large reasoning models have recently made significant strides in mathematical and code reasoning, yet their success has not transferred smoothly to the medical domain. While multiple factors contribute to this disparity, a critical issue is the inadequate focus on the quality of intermediate reflection steps, which is particularly crucial in high-stakes medical scenarios. To address this challenge, we propose Med-REFL, a \underline{\textbf{Med}}ical \underline{\textbf{R}}easoning \underline{\textbf{E}}nhancement via self-corrected \underline{\textbf{F}}ine-grained ref\underline{\textbf{L}}ection. Our method leverages a tree-of-thought approach to decompose medical questions into fine-grained reasoning paths, quantitatively evaluating each step and its subsequent reflections. These assessments enable automatic construction of direct preference optimization data, reducing reliance on expensive expert annotations while guiding models to identify and correct reasoning errors. Experimental results on the MedQA-USMLE benchmark demonstrate Med-REFL achieves consistent improvements, with average gains up to 4.11\%. Notably, it further boosts the state-of-the-art performance of 7B/8B models by an additional 4.13\%. Furthermore, Med-REFL exhibits strong generalization capabilities and robustness across several challenging medical question-answering datasets. Our work illustrates that prioritizing reflection quality leads to more accurate and trustworthy reasoning in medical AI applications. Checkpoints, code, and data can be found in https://github.com/TianYin123/Med-REFL.

Related papers

• Med-R$^3$: Enhancing Medical Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning of LLMs via Progressive Reinforcement Learning [31.58210903685538]
  We introduce **Med-R$3$**, a **Med**ical **R**etrieval-augmented **R**easoning framework driven by progressive **R**einforcement learning.<n>In this framework, we first develop the model's ability to perform logical reasoning over medical problems.<n>We then adaptively optimize the retrieval capability to better align with the characteristics of knowledge corpus and external information utilization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-31T13:31:01Z)
• Uncertainty-Driven Expert Control: Enhancing the Reliability of Medical Vision-Language Models [52.2001050216955]
  Existing methods aim to enhance the performance of Medical Vision Language Model (MedVLM) by adjusting model structure, fine-tuning with high-quality data, or through preference fine-tuning.<n>We propose an expert-in-the-loop framework named Expert-Controlled-Free Guidance (Expert-CFG) to align MedVLM with clinical expertise without additional training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-12T09:03:30Z)
• GEMeX-ThinkVG: Towards Thinking with Visual Grounding in Medical VQA via Reinforcement Learning [50.94508930739623]
  Medical visual question answering aims to support clinical decision-making by enabling models to answer natural language questions based on medical images.<n>Current methods still suffer from limited answer reliability and poor interpretability, impairing the ability of clinicians and patients to understand and trust model-generated answers.<n>This work first proposes a Thinking with Visual Grounding dataset wherein the answer generation is decomposed into intermediate reasoning steps.<n>We introduce a novel verifiable reward mechanism for reinforcement learning to guide post-training, improving the alignment between the model's reasoning process and its final answer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-22T08:09:58Z)
• Med-PRM: Medical Reasoning Models with Stepwise, Guideline-verified Process Rewards [21.831262938278915]
  We introduce Med-PRM, a process reward modeling framework to verify each reasoning step against established medical knowledge bases.<n>Med-PRM achieves state-of-the-art performance, with improving the performance of base models by up to 13.50%.<n>We demonstrate the generality of Med-PRM by integrating it in a plug-and-play fashion with strong policy models such as Meerkat.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-13T05:36:30Z)
• ReasonMed: A 370K Multi-Agent Generated Dataset for Advancing Medical Reasoning [44.96018028534255]
  ReasonMed is the largest medical reasoning dataset, comprising 370k high-quality examples distilled from 1.7 million initial reasoning paths.<n>We train ReasonMed-7B, which sets a new benchmark for sub-10B models, outperforming the prior best by 4.17% and even exceeding LLaMA3.1-70B on PubMedQA by 4.60%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-11T08:36:55Z)
• MedCite: Can Language Models Generate Verifiable Text for Medicine? [40.000282950108094]
  Existing LLM-based question-answering systems lack citation generation and evaluation capabilities.<n>We introduce name, the first end-to-end framework that facilitates the design and evaluation of citation generation with LLMs for medical tasks.<n>We introduce a novel multi-pass retrieval-citation method that generates high-quality citations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-07T00:46:18Z)
• AutoMedEval: Harnessing Language Models for Automatic Medical Capability Evaluation [55.2739790399209]
  We present AutoMedEval, an open-sourced automatic evaluation model with 13B parameters specifically engineered to measure the question-answering proficiency of medical LLMs.<n>The overarching objective of AutoMedEval is to assess the quality of responses produced by diverse models, aspiring to significantly reduce the dependence on human evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-17T07:44:54Z)
• Structured Outputs Enable General-Purpose LLMs to be Medical Experts [50.02627258858336]
  Large language models (LLMs) often struggle with open-ended medical questions.<n>We propose a novel approach utilizing structured medical reasoning.<n>Our approach achieves the highest Factuality Score of 85.8, surpassing fine-tuned models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-05T05:24:55Z)
• MedCoT: Medical Chain of Thought via Hierarchical Expert [48.91966620985221]
  This paper presents MedCoT, a novel hierarchical expert verification reasoning chain method.<n>It is designed to enhance interpretability and accuracy in biomedical imaging inquiries.<n> Experimental evaluations on four standard Med-VQA datasets demonstrate that MedCoT surpasses existing state-of-the-art approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-18T11:14:02Z)
• uMedSum: A Unified Framework for Advancing Medical Abstractive Summarization [23.173826980480936]
  Current methods often sacrifice key information for faithfulness or introduce confabulations when prioritizing informativeness. This paper presents a benchmark of six advanced abstractive summarization methods across three diverse datasets using five standardized metrics. We propose uMedSum, a modular hybrid summarization framework that introduces novel approaches for sequential confabulation removal followed by key missing information addition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-22T03:08:49Z)
• Few shot chain-of-thought driven reasoning to prompt LLMs for open ended medical question answering [24.43605359639671]
  We propose a modified version of the MedQA-USMLE dataset, named MEDQA-OPEN. It contains open-ended medical questions without options to mimic clinical scenarios, along with clinician-approved reasoned answers. We implement a prompt driven by Chain of Thought (CoT) reasoning, CLINICR, to mirror the prospective process of incremental reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-07T20:48:40Z)
• Automated Medical Coding on MIMIC-III and MIMIC-IV: A Critical Review and Replicability Study [60.56194508762205]
  We reproduce, compare, and analyze state-of-the-art automated medical coding machine learning models. We show that several models underperform due to weak configurations, poorly sampled train-test splits, and insufficient evaluation. We present the first comprehensive results on the newly released MIMIC-IV dataset using the reproduced models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-21T11:54:44Z)
• Federated Deep AUC Maximization for Heterogeneous Data with a Constant Communication Complexity [77.78624443410216]
  We propose improved FDAM algorithms for detecting heterogeneous chest data. A result of this paper is that the communication of the proposed algorithm is strongly independent of the number of machines and also independent of the accuracy level. Experiments have demonstrated the effectiveness of our FDAM algorithm on benchmark datasets and on medical chest Xray images from different organizations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-09T04:05:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.