MedCoT: Medical Chain of Thought via Hierarchical Expert

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.13736v1
• Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 11:14:02 GMT
• Title: MedCoT: Medical Chain of Thought via Hierarchical Expert
• Authors: Jiaxiang Liu, Yuan Wang, Jiawei Du, Joey Tianyi Zhou, Zuozhu Liu,
• Abstract summary: This paper presents MedCoT, a novel hierarchical expert verification reasoning chain method.<n>It is designed to enhance interpretability and accuracy in biomedical imaging inquiries.<n> Experimental evaluations on four standard Med-VQA datasets demonstrate that MedCoT surpasses existing state-of-the-art approaches.
• Score: 48.91966620985221
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Artificial intelligence has advanced in Medical Visual Question Answering (Med-VQA), but prevalent research tends to focus on the accuracy of the answers, often overlooking the reasoning paths and interpretability, which are crucial in clinical settings. Besides, current Med-VQA algorithms, typically reliant on singular models, lack the robustness needed for real-world medical diagnostics which usually require collaborative expert evaluation. To address these shortcomings, this paper presents MedCoT, a novel hierarchical expert verification reasoning chain method designed to enhance interpretability and accuracy in biomedical imaging inquiries. MedCoT is predicated on two principles: The necessity for explicit reasoning paths in Med-VQA and the requirement for multi-expert review to formulate accurate conclusions. The methodology involves an Initial Specialist proposing diagnostic rationales, followed by a Follow-up Specialist who validates these rationales, and finally, a consensus is reached through a vote among a sparse Mixture of Experts within the locally deployed Diagnostic Specialist, which then provides the definitive diagnosis. Experimental evaluations on four standard Med-VQA datasets demonstrate that MedCoT surpasses existing state-of-the-art approaches, providing significant improvements in performance and interpretability.

Related papers

• MedAgent-Pro: Towards Multi-modal Evidence-based Medical Diagnosis via Reasoning Agentic Workflow [16.089816031251335]
  Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have gained significant attention and achieved success across various domains. They lack detailed perception of visual inputs, limiting their ability to perform quantitative image analysis. We propose MedAgent-Pro, an evidence-based reasoning agentic system designed to achieve reliable, explainable, and precise medical diagnoses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-21T14:04:18Z)
• Uncertainty-aware abstention in medical diagnosis based on medical texts [87.88110503208016]
  This study addresses the critical issue of reliability for AI-assisted medical diagnosis. We focus on the selection prediction approach that allows the diagnosis system to abstain from providing the decision if it is not confident in the diagnosis. We introduce HUQ-2, a new state-of-the-art method for enhancing reliability in selective prediction tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-25T10:15:21Z)
• MedXpertQA: Benchmarking Expert-Level Medical Reasoning and Understanding [20.83722922095852]
  MedXpertQA includes 4,460 questions spanning 17 specialties and 11 body systems. MM introduces expert-level exam questions with diverse images and rich clinical information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-30T14:07:56Z)
• Hierarchical Divide-and-Conquer for Fine-Grained Alignment in LLM-Based Medical Evaluation [31.061600616994145]
  HDCEval is built on a set of fine-grained medical evaluation guidelines developed in collaboration with professional doctors. The framework decomposes complex evaluation tasks into specialized subtasks, each evaluated by expert models. This hierarchical approach ensures that each aspect of the evaluation is handled with expert precision, leading to a significant improvement in alignment with human evaluators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-12T07:30:49Z)
• Medchain: Bridging the Gap Between LLM Agents and Clinical Practice through Interactive Sequential Benchmarking [58.25862290294702]
  We present MedChain, a dataset of 12,163 clinical cases that covers five key stages of clinical workflow.<n>We also propose MedChain-Agent, an AI system that integrates a feedback mechanism and a MCase-RAG module to learn from previous cases and adapt its responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-02T15:25:02Z)
• MedAide: Towards an Omni Medical Aide via Specialized LLM-based Multi-Agent Collaboration [16.062646854608094]
  Large Language Model (LLM)-driven interactive systems currently show potential promise in healthcare domains. This paper proposes MedAide, an omni medical multi-agent collaboration framework for specialized healthcare services.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-16T13:10:27Z)
• A Spectrum Evaluation Benchmark for Medical Multi-Modal Large Language Models [57.88111980149541]
  We introduce Asclepius, a novel Med-MLLM benchmark that assesses Med-MLLMs in terms of distinct medical specialties and different diagnostic capacities.<n>Grounded in 3 proposed core principles, Asclepius ensures a comprehensive evaluation by encompassing 15 medical specialties.<n>We also provide an in-depth analysis of 6 Med-MLLMs and compare them with 3 human specialists.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-17T08:04:23Z)
• Emulating Human Cognitive Processes for Expert-Level Medical Question-Answering with Large Language Models [0.23463422965432823]
  BooksMed is a novel framework based on a Large Language Model (LLM) It emulates human cognitive processes to deliver evidence-based and reliable responses. We present ExpertMedQA, a benchmark comprised of open-ended, expert-level clinical questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-17T13:39:26Z)
• Validating polyp and instrument segmentation methods in colonoscopy through Medico 2020 and MedAI 2021 Challenges [58.32937972322058]
  "Medico automatic polyp segmentation (Medico 2020)" and "MedAI: Transparency in Medical Image (MedAI 2021)" competitions. We present a comprehensive summary and analyze each contribution, highlight the strength of the best-performing methods, and discuss the possibility of clinical translations of such methods into the clinic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-30T16:08:45Z)
• SHAMSUL: Systematic Holistic Analysis to investigate Medical Significance Utilizing Local interpretability methods in deep learning for chest radiography pathology prediction [1.0138723409205497]
  The study delves into the application of four well-established interpretability methods: Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME), Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) and Layer-wise Relevance Propagation (LRP) Our analysis encompasses both single-label and multi-label predictions, providing a comprehensive and unbiased assessment through quantitative and qualitative investigations, which are compared against human expert annotation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-16T11:10:35Z)
• Semi-Supervised Variational Reasoning for Medical Dialogue Generation [70.838542865384]
  Two key characteristics are relevant for medical dialogue generation: patient states and physician actions. We propose an end-to-end variational reasoning approach to medical dialogue generation. A physician policy network composed of an action-classifier and two reasoning detectors is proposed for augmented reasoning ability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-13T04:14:35Z)
• Inheritance-guided Hierarchical Assignment for Clinical Automatic Diagnosis [50.15205065710629]
  Clinical diagnosis, which aims to assign diagnosis codes for a patient based on the clinical note, plays an essential role in clinical decision-making. We propose a novel framework to combine the inheritance-guided hierarchical assignment and co-occurrence graph propagation for clinical automatic diagnosis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-27T13:16:51Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.