Machine Mirages: Defining the Undefined

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.13990v1
• Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2025 11:45:38 GMT
• Title: Machine Mirages: Defining the Undefined
• Authors: Hamidou Tembine,
• Abstract summary: multimodal machine intelligence systems began to exhibit a new class of cognitive aberrations: machine mirages.<n>These include delusion, illusion, confabulation, hallucination, misattribution error, semantic drift, semantic compression, exaggeration, causal inference failure.<n>This article presents some of the errors and argues that these failures must be explicitly defined and systematically assessed.
• Score: 1.779336682160787
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: As multimodal machine intelligence systems started achieving average animal-level and average human-level fluency in many measurable tasks in processing images, language, and sound, they began to exhibit a new class of cognitive aberrations: machine mirages. These include delusion, illusion, confabulation, hallucination, misattribution error, semantic drift, semantic compression, exaggeration, causal inference failure, uncanny valley of perception, bluffing-patter-bullshitting, cognitive stereotypy, pragmatic misunderstanding, hypersignification, semantic reheating-warming, simulated authority effect, fallacious abductive leap, contextual drift, referential hallucination, semiotic Frankenstein effect, calibration failure, spurious correlation, bias amplification, concept drift sensitivity, misclassification under uncertainty, adversarial vulnerability, overfitting, prosodic misclassification, accent bias, turn boundary failure, semantic boundary confusion, noise overfitting, latency-induced decision drift, ambiguity collapse and other forms of error that mimic but do not replicate human or animal fallibility. This article presents some of the errors and argues that these failures must be explicitly defined and systematically assessed. Understanding machine mirages is essential not only for improving machine intelligence reliability but also for constructing a multiscale ethical, co-evolving intelligence ecosystem that respects the diverse forms of life, cognition, and expression it will inevitably touch.

Related papers

• Disentangling Deception and Hallucination Failures in LLMs [7.906722750233381]
  We propose an internal, mechanism-oriented perspective that separates Knowledge Existence from Behavior Expression.<n> hallucination and deception correspond to two qualitatively different failure modes that may appear similar at the output level but differ in their underlying mechanisms.<n>We analyze these failure modes through representation separability, sparse interpretability, and inference-time activation steering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-16T07:36:49Z)
• Agentic Uncertainty Quantification [76.94013626702183]
  We propose a unified Dual-Process Agentic UQ (AUQ) framework that transforms verbalized uncertainty into active, bi-directional control signals.<n>Our architecture comprises two complementary mechanisms: System 1 (Uncertainty-Aware Memory, UAM), which implicitly propagates verbalized confidence and semantic explanations to prevent blind decision-making; and System 2 (Uncertainty-Aware Reflection, UAR), which utilizes these explanations as rational cues to trigger targeted inference-time resolution only when necessary.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-22T07:16:26Z)
• Generative Human-Object Interaction Detection via Differentiable Cognitive Steering of Multi-modal LLMs [85.69785384599827]
  Human-object interaction (HOI) detection aims to localize human-object pairs and the interactions between them.<n>Existing methods operate under a closed-world assumption, treating the task as a classification problem over a small, predefined verb set.<n>We propose GRASP-HO, a novel Generative Reasoning And Steerable Perception framework that reformulates HOI detection from the closed-set classification task to the open-vocabulary generation problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-19T14:41:50Z)
• Plausibility as Failure: How LLMs and Humans Co-Construct Epistemic Error [0.0]
  This study examines how different forms of epistemic failure emerge, are masked, and are tolerated in human AI interaction.<n>Evaluators frequently conflated criteria such as correctness, relevance, bias, groundedness, and consistency, indicating that human judgment collapses analytical distinctions into intuitives shaped by form and fluency.<n>The study provides implications for LLM assessment, digital literacy, and the design of trustworthy human AI communication.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-18T16:45:29Z)
• When Alignment Fails: Multimodal Adversarial Attacks on Vision-Language-Action Models [75.16145284285456]
  We introduce VLA-Fool, a comprehensive study of multimodal adversarial robustness in embodied VLA models under both white-box and black-box settings.<n>We develop the first automatically crafted and semantically guided prompting framework.<n> Experiments on the LIBERO benchmark reveal that even minor multimodal perturbations can cause significant behavioral deviations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-20T10:14:32Z)
• Mathematical Analysis of Hallucination Dynamics in Large Language Models: Uncertainty Quantification, Advanced Decoding, and Principled Mitigation [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are powerful linguistic engines but remain susceptible to hallucinations.<n>We present a mathematically grounded framework to understand, measure, and mitigate these hallucinations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-19T00:58:36Z)
• Automatic Minds: Cognitive Parallels Between Hypnotic States and Large Language Model Processing [0.0]
  The cognitive processes of the hypnotized mind and the computational operations of large language models share deep functional parallels.<n>Both systems generate sophisticated, contextually appropriate behavior through automatic pattern-completion mechanisms.<n>The future of reliable AI lies in hybrid architectures that integrate generative fluency with mechanisms of executive monitoring.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-03T09:08:50Z)
• Beyond Accuracy: Rethinking Hallucination and Regulatory Response in Generative AI [7.068082004005692]
  Hallucination in generative AI is often treated as a technical failure to produce factually correct output.<n>This paper critically examines how regulatory and evaluation frameworks have inherited a narrow view of hallucination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-12T19:41:10Z)
• Semantic Energy: Detecting LLM Hallucination Beyond Entropy [106.92072182161712]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are being increasingly deployed in real-world applications, but they remain susceptible to hallucinations.<n>Uncertainty estimation is a feasible approach to detect such hallucinations.<n>We introduce Semantic Energy, a novel uncertainty estimation framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-20T07:33:50Z)
• A comprehensive taxonomy of hallucinations in Large Language Models [0.0]
  Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized natural language processing, yet their propensity for hallucination remains a critical challenge.<n>This report provides a comprehensive taxonomy of LLM hallucinations, beginning with a formal definition and a theoretical framework.<n>It analyzes the underlying causes, categorizing them into data-related issues, model-related factors, and prompt-related influences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-03T14:37:16Z)
• The Unified Cognitive Consciousness Theory for Language Models: Anchoring Semantics, Thresholds of Activation, and Emergent Reasoning [2.5200794639628032]
  Few-shot learning in large language models (LLMs) reveals a core paradox: certain tasks generalize from just a few examples, while others demand extensive supervision.<n>We introduce the Unified Cognitive Consciousness Theory (UCCT), which reconceptualizes LLMs as unconscious substrates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-02T18:12:43Z)
• Hallucination, reliability, and the role of generative AI in science [0.05657375260432172]
  Some arguments suggest that hallucinations are an inevitable consequence of the mechanisms underlying generative inference.<n>I argue that although corrosive hallucinations do pose a threat to scientific reliability, they are not inevitable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-11T13:38:56Z)
• Calibrating Verbal Uncertainty as a Linear Feature to Reduce Hallucinations [51.92795774118647]
  We find that verbal uncertainty'' is governed by a single linear feature in the representation space of LLMs.<n>We show that this has only moderate correlation with the actual semantic uncertainty'' of the model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-18T17:51:04Z)
• Tuning-Free Accountable Intervention for LLM Deployment -- A Metacognitive Approach [55.613461060997004]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have catalyzed transformative advances across a spectrum of natural language processing tasks. We propose an innovative textitmetacognitive approach, dubbed textbfCLEAR, to equip LLMs with capabilities for self-aware error identification and correction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-08T19:18:53Z)
• Enabling High-Level Machine Reasoning with Cognitive Neuro-Symbolic Systems [67.01132165581667]
  We propose to enable high-level reasoning in AI systems by integrating cognitive architectures with external neuro-symbolic components. We illustrate a hybrid framework centered on ACT-R and we discuss the role of generative models in recent and future applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-13T21:20:17Z)
• Learning Causal Mechanisms through Orthogonal Neural Networks [2.77390041716769]
  We investigate a problem of learning, in a fully unsupervised manner, the inverse of a set of independent mechanisms from distorted data points. We propose an unsupervised method that discovers and disentangles a set of independent mechanisms from unlabeled data, and learns how to invert them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-05T13:11:33Z)
• Navigating the Grey Area: How Expressions of Uncertainty and Overconfidence Affect Language Models [74.07684768317705]
  LMs are highly sensitive to markers of certainty in prompts, with accuies varying more than 80%. We find that expressions of high certainty result in a decrease in accuracy as compared to low expressions; similarly, factive verbs hurt performance, while evidentials benefit performance. These associations may suggest that LMs is based on observed language use, rather than truly reflecting uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-26T23:46:29Z)
• Shaking the foundations: delusions in sequence models for interaction and control [45.34593341136043]
  We show that sequence models "lack the understanding of the cause and effect of their actions" leading them to draw incorrect inferences due to auto-suggestive delusions. We show that in supervised learning, one can teach a system to condition or intervene on data by training with factual and counterfactual error signals respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-20T23:31:05Z)
• My Teacher Thinks The World Is Flat! Interpreting Automatic Essay Scoring Mechanism [71.34160809068996]
  Recent work shows that automated scoring systems are prone to even common-sense adversarial samples. We utilize recent advances in interpretability to find the extent to which features such as coherence, content and relevance are important for automated scoring mechanisms. We also find that since the models are not semantically grounded with world-knowledge and common sense, adding false facts such as the world is flat'' actually increases the score instead of decreasing it.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-27T06:19:20Z)
• Machine Semiotics [0.0]
  For speech assistive devices, the learning of machine-specific meanings of human utterances appears to be sufficient. Using the quite trivial example of a cognitive heating device, we show that this process can be formalized as the reinforcement learning of utterance-meaning pairs (UMP)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-24T15:49:54Z)
• Mechanisms for Handling Nested Dependencies in Neural-Network Language Models and Humans [75.15855405318855]
  We studied whether a modern artificial neural network trained with "deep learning" methods mimics a central aspect of human sentence processing. Although the network was solely trained to predict the next word in a large corpus, analysis showed the emergence of specialized units that successfully handled local and long-distance syntactic agreement. We tested the model's predictions in a behavioral experiment where humans detected violations in number agreement in sentences with systematic variations in the singular/plural status of multiple nouns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-19T12:00:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.