Not Even Nice Work If You Can Get It; A Longitudinal Study of Uber's Algorithmic Pay and Pricing

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.15278v1
• Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 08:59:39 GMT
• Title: Not Even Nice Work If You Can Get It; A Longitudinal Study of Uber's Algorithmic Pay and Pricing
• Authors: Reuben Binns, Jake Stein, Siddhartha Datta, Max Van Kleek, Nigel Shadbolt,
• Abstract summary: Ride-sharing platforms like Uber market themselves as enabling flexibility' for their workforce.<n>We describe our process of participatory action research with drivers and trade union organisers, culminating in a participatory audit of Uber's algorithmic pay and work allocation.<n>We find that after dynamic pricing, pay has decreased, Uber's cut has increased, job allocation and pay is less predictable, inequality between drivers is increased, and drivers spend more time waiting for jobs.
• Score: 20.694356269172857
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Ride-sharing platforms like Uber market themselves as enabling `flexibility' for their workforce, meaning that drivers are expected to anticipate when and where the algorithm will allocate them jobs, and how well remunerated those jobs will be. In this work we describe our process of participatory action research with drivers and trade union organisers, culminating in a participatory audit of Uber's algorithmic pay and work allocation, before and after the introduction of dynamic pricing. Through longitudinal analysis of 1.5 million trips from 258 drivers in the UK, we find that after dynamic pricing, pay has decreased, Uber's cut has increased, job allocation and pay is less predictable, inequality between drivers is increased, and drivers spend more time waiting for jobs. In addition to these findings, we provide methodological and theoretical contributions to algorithm auditing, gig work, and the emerging practice of worker data science.

Related papers

• FareShare: A Tool for Labor Organizers to Estimate Lost Wages and Contest Arbitrary AI and Algorithmic Deactivations [9.632548567569636]
  Deactivation-the abrupt removal of gig workers' platform access-typically occurs through arbitrary AI and algorithmic decisions with little explanation or recourse.<n>This represents one of the most severe forms of algorithmic control and often devastates workers' financial stability.<n>Recent U.S. state policies now mandate appeals processes and recovering compensation during the period of wrongful deactivation.<n>We designed FareShare, a computational tool automating lost wage estimation for deactivated drivers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-13T18:46:47Z)
• Finding A Taxi with Illegal Driver Substitution Activity via Behavior Modelings [42.090136287906915]
  Illegal Driver Substitution (IDS) activity for a taxi is a grave unlawful activity in the taxi industry. Currently, the IDS activity is manually supervised by law enforcers. We propose a computational method that helps law enforcers efficiently find the taxis which tend to have the IDS activity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-18T01:47:31Z)
• Taxi dispatching strategies with compensations [2.952318265191524]
  This paper presents a new algorithm for taxi assignment to customers that considers taxi reassignments. We propose an economic compensation scheme to make individually rational drivers agree to proposed modifications in their assigned clients.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-21T17:54:46Z)
• User Strategization and Trustworthy Algorithms [81.82279667028423]
  We show that user strategization can actually help platforms in the short term. We then show that it corrupts platforms' data and ultimately hurts their ability to make counterfactual decisions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-29T16:09:42Z)
• A Better Match for Drivers and Riders: Reinforcement Learning at Lyft [9.901159075969318]
  We use a novel online reinforcement learning approach that estimates the future earnings of drivers in real time. This change was the first documented implementation of a ridesharing matching algorithm that can learn and improve in real time. Lyft rolled out the algorithm globally in 2021.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-20T20:49:06Z)
• Studying the Impact of Semi-Cooperative Drivers on Overall Highway Flow [76.38515853201116]
  Semi-cooperative behaviors are intrinsic properties of human drivers and should be considered for autonomous driving. New autonomous planners can consider the social value orientation (SVO) of human drivers to generate socially-compliant trajectories. We present study of implicit semi-cooperative driving where agents deploy a game-theoretic version of iterative best response.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-23T16:01:36Z)
• Driver Profiling and Bayesian Workload Estimation Using Naturalistic Peripheral Detection Study Data [40.43737902900321]
  We tackle the problem of workload estimation from driving performance data. Key environmental factors that induce a high mental workload are identified via video analysis. A supervised learning framework is introduced to profile drivers based on the average workload they experience. A Bayesian filtering approach is then proposed for sequentially estimating, in (near) real-time, the driver's instantaneous workload.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-26T13:15:44Z)
• Short term prediction of demand for ride hailing services: A deep learning approach [8.61268901380738]
  This paper proposes UberNet, a deep learning Convolutional Neural Network for short-term prediction of demand for ride-hailing services. By comparing the performance of UberNet with several other approaches, we show that the prediction quality of the model is highly competitive. This suggests that Ubernet is more naturally suited to including complex motivators in making real-time passenger demand predictions for ride-hailing services.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-07T21:08:03Z)
• FBLNet: FeedBack Loop Network for Driver Attention Prediction [50.936478241688114]
  Nonobjective driving experience is difficult to model, so a mechanism simulating the driver experience accumulation procedure is absent in existing methods.<n>We propose a FeedBack Loop Network (FBLNet), which attempts to model the driving experience accumulation procedure.<n>Our model exhibits a solid advantage over existing methods, achieving an outstanding performance improvement on two driver attention benchmark datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-05T08:25:09Z)
• Algorithmic Audit of Italian Car Insurance: Evidence of Unfairness in Access and Pricing [57.34513043917978]
  We conduct an audit of pricing algorithms employed by companies in the Italian car insurance industry. We show that birthplace and gender have a direct and sizeable impact on the prices quoted to drivers. We find that drivers with riskier profiles tend to see fewer quotes in the aggregator result pages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-21T07:35:47Z)
• Investigating Taxi and Uber competition in New York City: Multi-agent modeling by reinforcement-learning [0.0]
  This study investigates the existing competition between the mainstream hailing services (i.e., Yellow and Green Cabs) and e-hailing services (i.e., Uber) in New York City. Data visualization techniques are employed to find existing and new patterns in travel behavior. Results of our study illustrate that e-hailers dominate low-travel-density areas, and that e-hailers quickly identify and respond to change in travel demand.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-28T08:08:18Z)
• Predicting Individual Treatment Effects of Large-scale Team Competitions in a Ride-sharing Economy [47.47879093076968]
  We analyze data collected from more than 500 large-scale team competitions organized by a leading ride-sharing platform. Through a careful investigation of features and predictors, we are able to reduce out-sample prediction error by more than 24%. A simulated analysis shows that by simply changing a few contest design options, the average treatment effect of a real competition is expected to increase by as much as 26%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-07T22:01:50Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.