The Quantified Body: Identity, Empowerment, and Control in Smart Wearables

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.15991v3
• Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2025 07:23:34 GMT
• Title: The Quantified Body: Identity, Empowerment, and Control in Smart Wearables
• Authors: Maijunxian Wang,
• Abstract summary: This paper examines how wearable technologies reconfigure bodily autonomy by embedding users within feedback-driven systems of self-surveillance, data extraction, and algorithmic control.<n>I argue that smart wearables shift the discourse of health empowerment toward a modality of compliance aligned with values of productivity, efficiency, and self-discipline.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: In an era where the body is increasingly translated into streams of biometric data, smart wearables have become not merely tools of personal health tracking but infrastructures of predictive governance. This paper examines how wearable technologies reconfigure bodily autonomy by embedding users within feedback-driven systems of self-surveillance, data extraction, and algorithmic control. Drawing on Deleuze's concept of the control society, Zuboff's theory of surveillance capitalism, and Couldry and Mejias's notion of data colonialism, I argue that smart wearables shift the discourse of health empowerment toward a modality of compliance aligned with neoliberal values of productivity, efficiency, and self-discipline. Rather than offering transparent consent, these technologies operate within what scholars describe as a post-consent regime -- where asymmetrical data relations are normalized through seamless design and behavioral nudging. Through interdisciplinary analysis, the paper further explores alternative trajectories for wearable design and governance, from historical examples of care-centered devices to contemporary anti-extractive practices and collective data justice frameworks. Ultimately, it calls for a paradigm shift from individual optimization to democratic accountability and structural reform in the governance of bodily data.

Related papers

• Rethinking Data Protection in the (Generative) Artificial Intelligence Era [115.71019708491386]
  We propose a four-level taxonomy that captures the diverse protection needs arising in modern (generative) AI models and systems.<n>Our framework offers a structured understanding of the trade-offs between data utility and control, spanning the entire AI pipeline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-03T02:45:51Z)
• Ethical AI: Towards Defining a Collective Evaluation Framework [0.3413711585591077]
  Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming sectors such as healthcare, finance, and autonomous systems.<n>Yet its rapid integration raises urgent ethical concerns related to data ownership, privacy, and systemic bias.<n>This article proposes a modular ethical assessment framework built on ontological blocks of meaning-discrete, interpretable units.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-30T21:10:47Z)
• Authoritarian Recursions: How Fiction, History, and AI Reinforce Control in Education, Warfare, and Discourse [0.0]
  Article theorizes how artificial intelligence systems consolidate institutional control across education, military operations, and digital discourse.<n>Analyses how intelligent systems normalize hierarchy under the guise of efficiency and neutrality.<n>Case studies include automated proctoring in education, autonomous targeting in warfare, and algorithmic curation on social platforms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-12T01:01:26Z)
• Media and responsible AI governance: a game-theoretic and LLM analysis [61.132523071109354]
  This paper investigates the interplay between AI developers, regulators, users, and the media in fostering trustworthy AI systems.<n>Using evolutionary game theory and large language models (LLMs), we model the strategic interactions among these actors under different regulatory regimes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-12T21:39:38Z)
• AI and the Transformation of Accountability and Discretion in Urban Governance [1.9152655229960793]
  The study synthesizes insights to propose guiding principles for responsible AI integration in decision-making processes.<n>The analysis argues that AI does not simply restrict or enhance discretion but redistributes it across institutional levels.<n>It may simultaneously strengthen managerial oversight, enhance decision-making consistency, and improve operational efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-18T18:11:39Z)
• PRISM: Perspective Reasoning for Integrated Synthesis and Mediation as a Multi-Perspective Framework for AI Alignment [0.0]
  Perspective Reasoning for Integrated Synthesis and Mediation (PRISM) is a framework for addressing persistent challenges in AI alignment.<n>PRISM organizes moral concerns into seven "basis worldviews", each hypothesized to capture a distinct dimension of human moral cognition.<n>We briefly outline future directions, including real-world deployments and formal verifications, while maintaining the core focus on multi-perspective synthesis and conflict mediation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-05T02:13:57Z)
• Explaining by Imitating: Understanding Decisions by Interpretable Policy Learning [72.80902932543474]
  Understanding human behavior from observed data is critical for transparency and accountability in decision-making. Consider real-world settings such as healthcare, in which modeling a decision-maker's policy is challenging. We propose a data-driven representation of decision-making behavior that inheres transparency by design, accommodates partial observability, and operates completely offline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-28T13:06:14Z)
• Accountability in Offline Reinforcement Learning: Explaining Decisions with a Corpus of Examples [70.84093873437425]
  This paper introduces the Accountable Offline Controller (AOC) that employs the offline dataset as the Decision Corpus. AOC operates effectively in low-data scenarios, can be extended to the strictly offline imitation setting, and displays qualities of both conservation and adaptability. We assess AOC's performance in both simulated and real-world healthcare scenarios, emphasizing its capability to manage offline control tasks with high levels of performance while maintaining accountability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-11T17:20:32Z)
• Distributed Governance: a Principal-Agent Approach to Data Governance -- Part 1 Background & Core Definitions [0.0]
  We provide a model to evolve Data governance toward Information governance. This model bridges digital and non-digital information exchange. We provide a framework to deploy a distributed governance model embedding checks and balance between human and technological governance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-14T17:12:07Z)
• Operationalizing Counterfactual Metrics: Incentives, Ranking, and Information Asymmetry [62.53919624802853]
  We analyze the incentive misalignments that arise from such average treated outcome metrics. We show how counterfactual metrics can be modified to behave reasonably in patient-facing ranking systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T00:24:38Z)
• Auditing and Generating Synthetic Data with Controllable Trust Trade-offs [54.262044436203965]
  We introduce a holistic auditing framework that comprehensively evaluates synthetic datasets and AI models. It focuses on preventing bias and discrimination, ensures fidelity to the source data, assesses utility, robustness, and privacy preservation. We demonstrate the framework's effectiveness by auditing various generative models across diverse use cases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-21T09:03:18Z)
• Exploring the Trade-off between Plausibility, Change Intensity and Adversarial Power in Counterfactual Explanations using Multi-objective Optimization [73.89239820192894]
  We argue that automated counterfactual generation should regard several aspects of the produced adversarial instances. We present a novel framework for the generation of counterfactual examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-20T15:02:53Z)
• Representative & Fair Synthetic Data [68.8204255655161]
  We present a framework to incorporate fairness constraints into the self-supervised learning process. We generate a representative as well as fair version of the UCI Adult census data set. We consider representative & fair synthetic data a promising future building block to teach algorithms not on historic worlds, but rather on the worlds that we strive to live in.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-07T09:19:46Z)
• Self-Supervised and Controlled Multi-Document Opinion Summarization [16.674646504295687]
  We propose a self-supervised setup that considers an individual document as a target summary for a set of similar documents. We address the problem of hallucinations through the use of control codes. Our benchmarks on two datasets against graph-based and recent neural abstractive unsupervised models show that our proposed method generates summaries with a superior quality and relevance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-30T13:20:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.