Unpacking Generative AI in Education: Computational Modeling of Teacher and Student Perspectives in Social Media Discourse

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.16412v1
• Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 15:50:08 GMT
• Title: Unpacking Generative AI in Education: Computational Modeling of Teacher and Student Perspectives in Social Media Discourse
• Abstract summary: This study presents one of the most comprehensive analyses to date of stakeholder discourse dynamics on GAI in education using social media data.<n>Our dataset includes 1,199 Reddit posts and 13,959 corresponding top-level comments.<n>Our findings suggest a need for clearer institutional policies, more transparent GAI integration practices, and support mechanisms for both educators and students.
• Score: 0.5203732344753156
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Generative AI (GAI) technologies are quickly reshaping the educational landscape. As adoption accelerates, understanding how students and educators perceive these tools is essential. This study presents one of the most comprehensive analyses to date of stakeholder discourse dynamics on GAI in education using social media data. Our dataset includes 1,199 Reddit posts and 13,959 corresponding top-level comments. We apply sentiment analysis, topic modeling, and author classification. To support this, we propose and validate a modular framework that leverages prompt-based large language models (LLMs) for analysis of online social discourse, and we evaluate this framework against classical natural language processing (NLP) models. Our GPT-4o pipeline consistently outperforms prior approaches across all tasks. For example, it achieved 90.6% accuracy in sentiment analysis against gold-standard human annotations. Topic extraction uncovered 12 latent topics in the public discourse with varying sentiment and author distributions. Teachers and students convey optimism about GAI's potential for personalized learning and productivity in higher education. However, key differences emerged: students often voice distress over false accusations of cheating by AI detectors, while teachers generally express concern about job security, academic integrity, and institutional pressures to adopt GAI tools. These contrasting perspectives highlight the tension between innovation and oversight in GAI-enabled learning environments. Our findings suggest a need for clearer institutional policies, more transparent GAI integration practices, and support mechanisms for both educators and students. More broadly, this study demonstrates the potential of LLM-based frameworks for modeling stakeholder discourse within online communities.

Related papers

• Interpretable Difficulty-Aware Knowledge Tracing in Tutor-Student Dialogues [46.915280360954576]
  We propose an interpretable difficulty-aware conversational KT framework built upon large language models (LLMs)<n>The framework incorporates the original textual question and the next tutor-posed task to estimate the student's knowledge state and the difficulty of the upcoming turn.<n>We evaluate the framework on two tutor-student dialogue datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-01T21:07:24Z)
• Pedagogical Promise and Peril of AI: A Text Mining Analysis of ChatGPT Research Discussions in Programming Education [0.0]
  GenAI systems such as ChatGPT are increasingly discussed in programming education.<n>This chapter applies text mining to map scholarly discourse on ChatGPT in programming education.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-01T02:44:19Z)
• Group-Differentiated Discourse on Generative AI in High School Education: A Case Study of Reddit Communities [12.603101932945995]
  We study how different Reddit communities discuss generative AI in high school education.<n>Using 3,789 posts from five education-related subreddits, we compare student, teacher, and mixed communities.<n>Teachers are more likely to articulate explicit pedagogical trade-offs, simultaneously framing AI as both beneficial and harmful for learning.<n>Students more often discuss AI tactically in relation to accusations, grades, and enforcement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-26T03:06:21Z)
• Educators on the Frontline: Philosophical and Realistic Perspectives on Integrating ChatGPT into the Learning Space [3.122408196953971]
  The rapid emergence of Generative AI, particularly ChatGPT, has sparked a global debate on the future of education.<n>This study investigates the structured, grounded perspectives of a key stakeholder group: university educators.<n>It proposes a novel theoretical model that conceptualizes the educational environment as a "Learning Space" composed of seven subspaces.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-15T00:15:41Z)
• Beyond Automation: Socratic AI, Epistemic Agency, and the Implications of the Emergence of Orchestrated Multi-Agent Learning Architectures [0.0]
  Generative AI is no longer a peripheral tool in higher education.<n>This paper presents findings from a controlled experiment evaluating a Socratic AI Tutor.<n>Students using the Tutor reported significantly greater support for critical, independent, and reflective thinking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-07T07:49:03Z)
• Alignment and Safety in Large Language Models: Safety Mechanisms, Training Paradigms, and Emerging Challenges [47.14342587731284]
  This survey provides a comprehensive overview of alignment techniques, training protocols, and empirical findings in large language models (LLMs) alignment.<n>We analyze the development of alignment methods across diverse paradigms, characterizing the fundamental trade-offs between core alignment objectives.<n>We discuss state-of-the-art techniques, including Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), Constitutional AI, brain-inspired methods, and alignment uncertainty quantification (AUQ)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-25T20:52:58Z)
• Beyond classical and contemporary models: a transformative AI framework for student dropout prediction in distance learning using RAG, Prompt engineering, and Cross-modal fusion [0.4369550829556578]
  This paper introduces a transformative AI framework that redefines dropout prediction.<n>The framework achieves 89% accuracy and an F1-score of 0.88, outperforming conventional models by 7% and reducing false negatives by 21%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-04T21:41:43Z)
• What Makes a Good Natural Language Prompt? [72.3282960118995]
  We conduct a meta-analysis surveying more than 150 prompting-related papers from leading NLP and AI conferences from 2022 to 2025.<n>We propose a property- and human-centric framework for evaluating prompt quality, encompassing 21 properties categorized into six dimensions.<n>We then empirically explore multi-property prompt enhancements in reasoning tasks, observing that single-property enhancements often have the greatest impact.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-07T23:19:27Z)
• LLM Agents for Education: Advances and Applications [49.3663528354802]
  Large Language Model (LLM) agents have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in automating tasks and driving innovation across diverse educational applications.<n>This survey aims to provide a comprehensive technological overview of LLM agents for education, fostering further research and collaboration to enhance their impact for the greater good of learners and educators alike.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-14T11:53:44Z)
• BEYONDWORDS is All You Need: Agentic Generative AI based Social Media Themes Extractor [2.699900017799093]
  Thematic analysis of social media posts provides a major understanding of public discourse.<n>Traditional methods often struggle to capture the complexity and nuance of unstructured, large-scale text data.<n>This study introduces a novel methodology for thematic analysis that integrates tweet embeddings from pre-trained language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-26T18:18:37Z)
• Enhancing Higher Education with Generative AI: A Multimodal Approach for Personalised Learning [2.334887570960192]
  This research explores the opportunities of Generative AI (GenAI) in the realm of higher education.<n>We showcase the potential of GenAI in addressing a broad spectrum of educational queries.<n>By demonstrating a practical web application, this research underlines the imperative for integrating GenAI technologies to foster more dynamic and responsive educational environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-11T09:29:29Z)
• Generative AI in Education: A Study of Educators' Awareness, Sentiments, and Influencing Factors [2.217351976766501]
  This study delves into university instructors' experiences and attitudes toward AI language models. We find no correlation between teaching style and attitude toward generative AI. While CS educators show far more confidence in their technical understanding of generative AI tools, they show no more confidence in their ability to detect AI-generated work.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-22T19:21:29Z)
• Enhancing Instructional Quality: Leveraging Computer-Assisted Textual Analysis to Generate In-Depth Insights from Educational Artifacts [13.617709093240231]
  We examine how artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) methods can analyze educational content, teacher discourse, and student responses to foster instructional improvement. We identify key areas where AI/ML integration offers significant advantages, including teacher coaching, student support, and content development. This paper emphasizes the importance of aligning AI/ML technologies with pedagogical goals to realize their full potential in educational settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-06T18:29:18Z)
• AutoTutor meets Large Language Models: A Language Model Tutor with Rich Pedagogy and Guardrails [43.19453208130667]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have found several use cases in education, ranging from automatic question generation to essay evaluation. In this paper, we explore the potential of using Large Language Models (LLMs) to author Intelligent Tutoring Systems. We create a sample end-to-end tutoring system named MWPTutor, which uses LLMs to fill in the state space of a pre-defined finite state transducer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-14T14:53:56Z)
• Analysis of the User Perception of Chatbots in Education Using A Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling Approach [0.0]
  Key behavior-related aspects, such as Optimism, Innovativeness, Discomfort, Insecurity, Transparency, Ethics, Interaction, Engagement, and Accuracy, were studied. Results showed that Optimism and Innovativeness are positively associated with Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU) and Perceived Usefulness (PU)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-07T00:44:56Z)
• PapagAI:Automated Feedback for Reflective Essays [48.4434976446053]
  We present the first open-source automated feedback tool based on didactic theory and implemented as a hybrid AI system. The main objective of our work is to enable better learning outcomes for students and to complement the teaching activities of lecturers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-10T11:05:51Z)
• UKP-SQuARE: An Interactive Tool for Teaching Question Answering [61.93372227117229]
  The exponential growth of question answering (QA) has made it an indispensable topic in any Natural Language Processing (NLP) course. We introduce UKP-SQuARE as a platform for QA education. Students can run, compare, and analyze various QA models from different perspectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-31T11:29:04Z)
• Exploring User Perspectives on ChatGPT: Applications, Perceptions, and Implications for AI-Integrated Education [40.38809129759498]
  ChatGPT is most commonly used in the domains of higher education, K-12 education, and practical skills training. On one hand, some users view it as a transformative tool capable of amplifying student self-efficacy and learning motivation. On the other hand, there is a degree of apprehension among concerned users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-22T15:13:14Z)
• Investigating Fairness Disparities in Peer Review: A Language Model Enhanced Approach [77.61131357420201]
  We conduct a thorough and rigorous study on fairness disparities in peer review with the help of large language models (LMs) We collect, assemble, and maintain a comprehensive relational database for the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) conference from 2017 to date. We postulate and study fairness disparities on multiple protective attributes of interest, including author gender, geography, author, and institutional prestige.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-07T16:19:42Z)
• From Mimicking to Integrating: Knowledge Integration for Pre-Trained Language Models [55.137869702763375]
  This paper explores a novel PLM reuse paradigm, Knowledge Integration (KI) KI aims to merge the knowledge from different teacher-PLMs, each of which specializes in a different classification problem, into a versatile student model. We then design a Model Uncertainty--aware Knowledge Integration (MUKI) framework to recover the golden supervision for the student.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-11T07:59:08Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.