Quantum versus Classical Separation in Simultaneous Number-on-Forehead Communication
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.16804v1
- Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 07:40:43 GMT
- Title: Quantum versus Classical Separation in Simultaneous Number-on-Forehead Communication
- Authors: Guangxu Yang, Jiapeng Zhang,
- Abstract summary: We present the first exponential separation between quantum and bounded-error randomized communication complexity in a variant of the Number-on-Forehead model.<n>Specifically, we introduce the Gadgeted Hidden Matching Problem and show that it can be solved using only $O(log n)$ simultaneous quantum communication.
- Score: 4.871651154984323
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Quantum versus classical separation plays a central role in understanding the advantages of quantum computation. In this paper, we present the first exponential separation between quantum and bounded-error randomized communication complexity in a variant of the Number-on-Forehead (NOF) model. Namely, the three-player Simultaneous Number-on-Forehead model. Specifically, we introduce the Gadgeted Hidden Matching Problem and show that it can be solved using only $O(\log n)$ simultaneous quantum communication. In contrast, any simultaneous randomized protocol requires $\Omega(n^{1/16})$ communication. On the technical side, a key obstacle in separating quantum and classical communication in NOF models is that all known randomized NOF lower bound tools, such as the discrepancy method, typically apply to both randomized and quantum protocols. In this regard, our technique provides a new method for proving randomized lower bounds in the NOF setting and may be of independent interest beyond the separation result.
Related papers
- Comparing classical and quantum conditional disclosure of secrets [0.0]
conditional disclosure of secrets (CDS) setting is among the most basic primitives studied in cryptography.<n>We study the differences between quantum and classical CDS, with the aims of clarifying the power of quantum resources in cryptography.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-05T18:14:18Z) - Communication Complexity of Common Randomness Generation with Isotropic
States [5.312109949216557]
The paper considers two communication models -- one-way classical communication and one-way quantum communication.
We show that in the case of classical communication, quantum isotropic states have no advantage over noisy classical correlation.
In the case of quantum communication, we demonstrate that the common randomness rate can be increased by using superdense coding on quantum isotropic states.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-08T14:48:15Z) - One Clean Qubit Suffices for Quantum Communication Advantage [3.729242965449096]
We study the one-clean-qubit model of quantum communication where one qubit is in a pure state and all other qubits are maximally mixed.
Our proof is based on a recent hypercontractivity inequality introduced by Ellis, Kindler, Lifshitz, and Minzer.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-03T19:58:08Z) - Classical Verification of Quantum Learning [42.362388367152256]
We develop a framework for classical verification of quantum learning.
We propose a new quantum data access model that we call "mixture-of-superpositions" quantum examples.
Our results demonstrate that the potential power of quantum data for learning tasks, while not unlimited, can be utilized by classical agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-08T00:31:27Z) - Unbounded Quantum Advantage in Communication with Minimal Input Scaling [0.0]
We show an it unbounded quantum advantage in relation reconstruction without public coins.<n>We also highlight some applications of this task to semi-device-independent dimension witnessing and the detection of Mutually Unbiased Bases.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-17T16:58:05Z) - Decoupling by local random unitaries without simultaneous smoothing, and applications to multi-user quantum information tasks [0.0]
We show that a simple telescoping sum trick, together with the triangle inequality and a tensorisation property of expected-contractive coefficients of random channels, allow us to achieve general simultaneous decoupling for multiple users via local actions.
We obtain bounds on the expected deviation from ideal decoupling either in the one-shot setting in terms of smooth min-entropies, or the finite block length setting in terms of R'enyi entropies.
This leads to one-shot, finite block length, and simultaneous achievability results for several tasks in quantum Shannon theory.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-24T14:17:32Z) - Information Carried by a Single Particle in Quantum Multiple-Access
Channels [13.821363169821046]
Non-classical features of quantum systems have the potential to strengthen the way we currently exchange information.
We compare how well multi-party information can be transmitted to a single receiver using just one classical or quantum particle.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-06T14:01:56Z) - Quantum Worst-Case to Average-Case Reductions for All Linear Problems [66.65497337069792]
We study the problem of designing worst-case to average-case reductions for quantum algorithms.
We provide an explicit and efficient transformation of quantum algorithms that are only correct on a small fraction of their inputs into ones that are correct on all inputs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-06T22:01:49Z) - Validation tests of GBS quantum computers give evidence for quantum
advantage with a decoherent target [62.997667081978825]
We use positive-P phase-space simulations of grouped count probabilities as a fingerprint for verifying multi-mode data.
We show how one can disprove faked data, and apply this to a classical count algorithm.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-07T12:00:45Z) - Entanglement and coherence in Bernstein-Vazirani algorithm [58.720142291102135]
Bernstein-Vazirani algorithm allows one to determine a bit string encoded into an oracle.
We analyze in detail the quantum resources in the Bernstein-Vazirani algorithm.
We show that in the absence of entanglement, the performance of the algorithm is directly related to the amount of quantum coherence in the initial state.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-26T20:32:36Z) - Interactive Protocols for Classically-Verifiable Quantum Advantage [46.093185827838035]
"Interactions" between a prover and a verifier can bridge the gap between verifiability and implementation.
We demonstrate the first implementation of an interactive quantum advantage protocol, using an ion trap quantum computer.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-09T19:00:00Z) - Experimental violations of Leggett-Garg's inequalities on a quantum
computer [77.34726150561087]
We experimentally observe the violations of Leggett-Garg-Bell's inequalities on single and multi-qubit systems.
Our analysis highlights the limits of nowadays quantum platforms, showing that the above-mentioned correlation functions deviate from theoretical prediction as the number of qubits and the depth of the circuit grow.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-06T14:35:15Z) - Secure Two-Party Quantum Computation Over Classical Channels [63.97763079214294]
We consider the setting where the two parties (a classical Alice and a quantum Bob) can communicate only via a classical channel.
We show that it is in general impossible to realize a two-party quantum functionality with black-box simulation in the case of malicious quantum adversaries.
We provide a compiler that takes as input a classical proof of quantum knowledge (PoQK) protocol for a QMA relation R and outputs a zero-knowledge PoQK for R that can be verified by classical parties.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-15T17:55:31Z) - Quantum Communication Complexity of Distribution Testing [114.31181206328276]
Two players each receive $t$ samples from one distribution over $[n]$.
The goal is to decide whether their two distributions are equal, or are $epsilon$-far apart.
We show that the quantum communication complexity of this problem is $tildeO$(tepsilon2))$ qubits when distributions have low $l$-norm.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-26T09:05:58Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.