Simulation-Based Sensitivity Analysis in Optimal Treatment Regimes and Causal Decomposition with Individualized Interventions

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.19010v1
• Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 18:05:30 GMT
• Title: Simulation-Based Sensitivity Analysis in Optimal Treatment Regimes and Causal Decomposition with Individualized Interventions
• Authors: Soojin Park, Suyeon Kang, Chioun Lee,
• Abstract summary: We extend a simulation-based sensitivity analysis that simulates unmeasured confounders.<n>We propose a formal bounding strategy that benchmarks the strength of omitted confounding for binary risk factors.
• Score: 1.4433172583879073
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Causal decomposition analysis aims to assess the effect of modifying risk factors on reducing social disparities in outcomes. Recently, this analysis has incorporated individual characteristics when modifying risk factors by utilizing optimal treatment regimes (OTRs). Since the newly defined individualized effects rely on the no omitted confounding assumption, developing sensitivity analyses to account for potential omitted confounding is essential. Moreover, OTRs and individualized effects are primarily based on binary risk factors, and no formal approach currently exists to benchmark the strength of omitted confounding using observed covariates for binary risk factors. To address this gap, we extend a simulation-based sensitivity analysis that simulates unmeasured confounders, addressing two sources of bias emerging from deriving OTRs and estimating individualized effects. Additionally, we propose a formal bounding strategy that benchmarks the strength of omitted confounding for binary risk factors. Using the High School Longitudinal Study 2009 (HSLS:09), we demonstrate this sensitivity analysis and benchmarking method.

Related papers

• Wasserstein Distributionally Robust Nonparametric Regression [9.65010022854885]
  This paper studies the generalization properties of Wasserstein distributionally robust nonparametric estimators.<n>We establish non-asymptotic error bounds for the excess local worst-case risk.<n>The robustness of the proposed estimator is evaluated through simulation studies and illustrated with an application to the MNIST dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-12T18:07:37Z)
• Statistical Learning for Heterogeneous Treatment Effects: Pretraining, Prognosis, and Prediction [40.96453902709292]
  We propose pretraining strategies that leverage a phenomenon in real-world applications.<n>In medicine, components of the same biological signaling pathways frequently influence both baseline risk and treatment response.<n>We use this structure to incorporate side information and develop models that can exploit synergies between risk prediction and causal effect estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-01T05:12:14Z)
• Controlling Risk of Retrieval-augmented Generation: A Counterfactual Prompting Framework [77.45983464131977]
  We focus on how likely it is that a RAG model's prediction is incorrect, resulting in uncontrollable risks in real-world applications.<n>Our research identifies two critical latent factors affecting RAG's confidence in its predictions.<n>We develop a counterfactual prompting framework that induces the models to alter these factors and analyzes the effect on their answers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-24T14:52:14Z)
• Contrastive Factor Analysis [70.02770079785559]
  This paper introduces a novel Contrastive Factor Analysis framework. It aims to leverage factor analysis's advantageous properties within the realm of contrastive learning. To further leverage the interpretability properties of non-negative factor analysis, it is extended to a non-negative version.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-31T16:52:00Z)
• Pessimism Meets Risk: Risk-Sensitive Offline Reinforcement Learning [19.292214425524303]
  We study risk-sensitive reinforcement learning (RL), a crucial field due to its ability to enhance decision-making in scenarios where it is essential to manage uncertainty and minimize potential adverse outcomes. Our work focuses on applying the entropic risk measure to RL problems. We center on the linear Markov Decision Process (MDP) setting, a well-regarded theoretical framework that has yet to be examined from a risk-sensitive standpoint.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-10T13:09:52Z)
• Provable Risk-Sensitive Distributional Reinforcement Learning with General Function Approximation [54.61816424792866]
  We introduce a general framework on Risk-Sensitive Distributional Reinforcement Learning (RS-DisRL), with static Lipschitz Risk Measures (LRM) and general function approximation. We design two innovative meta-algorithms: textttRS-DisRL-M, a model-based strategy for model-based function approximation, and textttRS-DisRL-V, a model-free approach for general value function approximation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-28T08:43:18Z)
• Understanding Robust Overfitting from the Feature Generalization Perspective [61.770805867606796]
  Adversarial training (AT) constructs robust neural networks by incorporating adversarial perturbations into natural data. It is plagued by the issue of robust overfitting (RO), which severely damages the model's robustness. In this paper, we investigate RO from a novel feature generalization perspective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-01T07:57:03Z)
• Sharp Bounds for Generalized Causal Sensitivity Analysis [30.77874108094485]
  We propose a unified framework for causal sensitivity analysis under unobserved confounding. This includes (conditional) average treatment effects, effects for mediation analysis and path analysis, and distributional effects. Our bounds for (conditional) average treatment effects coincide with recent optimality results for causal sensitivity analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-26T14:44:32Z)
• Mitigating multiple descents: A model-agnostic framework for risk monotonization [84.6382406922369]
  We develop a general framework for risk monotonization based on cross-validation. We propose two data-driven methodologies, namely zero- and one-step, that are akin to bagging and boosting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-25T17:41:40Z)
• Two steps to risk sensitivity [4.974890682815778]
  conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) is a risk measure for modeling human and animal planning. We adopt a conventional distributional approach to CVaR in a sequential setting and reanalyze the choices of human decision-makers. We then consider a further critical property of risk sensitivity, namely time consistency, showing alternatives to this form of CVaR.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-12T16:27:47Z)
• Learning Bounds for Risk-sensitive Learning [86.50262971918276]
  In risk-sensitive learning, one aims to find a hypothesis that minimizes a risk-averse (or risk-seeking) measure of loss. We study the generalization properties of risk-sensitive learning schemes whose optimand is described via optimized certainty equivalents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-15T05:25:02Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.