Which Company Adjustment Matter? Insights from Uplift Modeling on Financial Health
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.19049v1
- Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 19:10:24 GMT
- Title: Which Company Adjustment Matter? Insights from Uplift Modeling on Financial Health
- Authors: Xinlin Wang, Mats Brorsson,
- Abstract summary: We apply uplift modeling to analyze the effect of company adjustment on their financial status.<n>The effect estimation of company adjustment needs to take into account not only individual treatment traits but also the temporal order of this series of treatments.
- Score: 0.8780492696427767
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Uplift modeling has achieved significant success in various fields, particularly in online marketing. It is a method that primarily utilizes machine learning and deep learning to estimate individual treatment effects. This paper we apply uplift modeling to analyze the effect of company adjustment on their financial status, and we treat these adjustment as treatments or interventions in this study. Although there have been extensive studies and application regarding binary treatments, multiple treatments, and continuous treatments, company adjustment are often more complex than these scenarios, as they constitute a series of multiple time-dependent actions. The effect estimation of company adjustment needs to take into account not only individual treatment traits but also the temporal order of this series of treatments. This study collects a real-world data set about company financial statements and reported behavior in Luxembourg for the experiments. First, we use two meta-learners and three other well-known uplift models to analyze different company adjustment by simplifying the adjustment as binary treatments. Furthermore, we propose a new uplift modeling framework (MTDnet) to address the time-dependent nature of these adjustment, and the experimental result shows the necessity of considering the timing of these adjustment.
Related papers
- Shrinkage-Based Regressions with Many Related Treatments [0.0]
Practitioners often want to disentangle the effects of many related, partially-overlapping treatments.<n>Common approaches that estimate separate treatment coefficients are too noisy for practical decision-making.<n>We propose a computationally light model that uses a customized ridge regression to move between a heterogeneous and a homogenous model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-01T21:44:30Z) - Generalized Prompt Tuning: Adapting Frozen Univariate Time Series Foundation Models for Multivariate Healthcare Time Series [3.9599054392856483]
Time series foundation models are pre-trained on large datasets and are able to achieve state-of-the-art performance in diverse tasks.
We propose a prompt-tuning-inspired fine-tuning technique, Gen-P-Tuning, that enables us to adapt an existing univariate time series foundation model.
We demonstrate the effectiveness of our fine-tuning approach against various baselines on two MIMIC classification tasks, and on influenza-like illness forecasting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-19T19:20:58Z) - Large Language Models are Miscalibrated In-Context Learners [22.30783674111999]
In this work, we deliver an in-depth analysis of the behavior across different choices of learning methods.<n>We observe that the miscalibration problem exists across all learning methods in low-resource setups.<n>We find that self-ensembling with max probability produces robust and calibrated predictions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-21T11:55:10Z) - The Blessings of Multiple Treatments and Outcomes in Treatment Effect
Estimation [53.81860494566915]
Existing studies leveraged proxy variables or multiple treatments to adjust for confounding bias.
In many real-world scenarios, there is greater interest in studying the effects on multiple outcomes.
We show that parallel studies of multiple outcomes involved in this setting can assist each other in causal identification.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-29T14:33:48Z) - Automated Medical Coding on MIMIC-III and MIMIC-IV: A Critical Review
and Replicability Study [60.56194508762205]
We reproduce, compare, and analyze state-of-the-art automated medical coding machine learning models.
We show that several models underperform due to weak configurations, poorly sampled train-test splits, and insufficient evaluation.
We present the first comprehensive results on the newly released MIMIC-IV dataset using the reproduced models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-21T11:54:44Z) - Learning to Infer Counterfactuals: Meta-Learning for Estimating Multiple
Imbalanced Treatment Effects [41.06974193338288]
We consider data episodes among treatment groups in counterfactual inference as meta-learning tasks.
We train a meta-learner from a set of source treatment groups with sufficient samples and update the model by gradient descent with limited samples in target treatment.
We perform experiments on two real-world datasets to evaluate inference accuracy and generalization ability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-13T23:22:12Z) - Extending Process Discovery with Model Complexity Optimization and
Cyclic States Identification: Application to Healthcare Processes [62.997667081978825]
The paper presents an approach to process mining providing semi-automatic support to model optimization.
A model simplification approach is proposed, which essentially abstracts the raw model at the desired granularity.
We aim to demonstrate the capabilities of the technological solution using three datasets from different applications in the healthcare domain.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-10T16:20:59Z) - Practical Challenges in Differentially-Private Federated Survival
Analysis of Medical Data [57.19441629270029]
In this paper, we take advantage of the inherent properties of neural networks to federate the process of training of survival analysis models.
In the realistic setting of small medical datasets and only a few data centers, this noise makes it harder for the models to converge.
We propose DPFed-post which adds a post-processing stage to the private federated learning scheme.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-08T10:03:24Z) - A Twin Neural Model for Uplift [59.38563723706796]
Uplift is a particular case of conditional treatment effect modeling.
We propose a new loss function defined by leveraging a connection with the Bayesian interpretation of the relative risk.
We show our proposed method is competitive with the state-of-the-art in simulation setting and on real data from large scale randomized experiments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-11T16:02:39Z) - Addressing catastrophic forgetting for medical domain expansion [9.720534481714953]
Model brittleness is a key concern when deploying deep learning models in real-world medical settings.
A model that has high performance at one institution may suffer a significant decline in performance when tested at other institutions.
We develop an approach to address catastrophic forget-ting based on elastic weight consolidation combined with modulation of batch normalization statistics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-24T22:33:38Z) - Interpretable Multiple Treatment Revenue Uplift Modeling [4.9571232160914365]
Uplift models support a firm's decision-making by predicting the change of a customer's behavior due to a treatment.
The paper extends corresponding approaches by developing uplift models for multiple treatments and continuous outcomes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-09T11:29:00Z) - Generalization Bounds and Representation Learning for Estimation of
Potential Outcomes and Causal Effects [61.03579766573421]
We study estimation of individual-level causal effects, such as a single patient's response to alternative medication.
We devise representation learning algorithms that minimize our bound, by regularizing the representation's induced treatment group distance.
We extend these algorithms to simultaneously learn a weighted representation to further reduce treatment group distances.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-01-21T10:16:33Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.