Integrating Pair Programming as a Work Practice

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.19511v1
• Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2025 11:02:03 GMT
• Title: Integrating Pair Programming as a Work Practice
• Authors: Nina Haugland Andersen, Anastasiia Tkalich, Nils Brede Moe, Darja Smite, Asgaut Mjølne Söderbom, Ola Hast, Viktoria Stray,
• Abstract summary: Pair programming (PP) is more relevant than ever.<n>Despite well-documented benefits of PP, its adoption remains inconsistent across software teams.<n>This study aims to understand the factors that facilitate or hinder team members' adoption as well as lasting engagement in PP.
• Score: 4.0252178854473275
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Context: Pair programming (PP) is more relevant than ever. As modern systems grow in complexity, knowledge sharing and collaboration across teams have become essential. However, despite well-documented benefits of PP, its adoption remains inconsistent across software teams. Objective: This study aims to understand the factors that facilitate or hinder team members' adoption as well as lasting engagement in PP. Method: We have conducted an exploratory single-case study in a mature agile company in Norway. We collected data through two rounds of interviews with team members in different roles and performed a thematic analysis of the interviews. Results: Our key finding is that multiple factors, related to the perceptions of how PP contributes to daily work, efforts associated with engaging in PP sessions, company and team attitudes, resources, infrastructure, and task characteristics, affect PP engagement. Conclusion: Long-term engagement in PP requires expected benefits with the practice being confirmed in firsthand experiences. Adapting the practice to each unique team, with insights drawn from collective learning, is also beneficial. Our findings will be beneficial for software practitioners seeking to make PP an integrated part of their team's workflow.

Related papers

• Safe to Stay: Psychological Safety Sustains Participation in Pull-based Open Source Projects [9.312605205492456]
  Psychological safety refers to the belief that team members can speak up or make mistakes without fear of negative consequences.<n>This study investigates whether team-level psychological safety is associated with contributors' sustained participation in open-source projects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-24T12:54:30Z)
• Code Collaborate: Dissecting Team Dynamics in First-Semester Programming Students [3.0294711465150006]
  The study highlights the collaboration trends that emerge as first-semester students develop a 2D game project. Results indicate that students often slightly overestimate their contributions, with more engaged individuals more likely to acknowledge mistakes. Team performance shows no significant variation based on nationality or gender composition, though teams that disbanded frequently consisted of lone wolves.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-28T11:42:05Z)
• TeamLoRA: Boosting Low-Rank Adaptation with Expert Collaboration and Competition [61.91764883512776]
  We introduce an innovative PEFT method, TeamLoRA, consisting of a collaboration and competition module for experts. By doing so, TeamLoRA connects the experts as a "Team" with internal collaboration and competition, enabling a faster and more accurate PEFT paradigm for multi-task learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-19T09:58:53Z)
• What Can Natural Language Processing Do for Peer Review? [173.8912784451817]
  In modern science, peer review is widely used, yet it is hard, time-consuming, and prone to error. Since the artifacts involved in peer review are largely text-based, Natural Language Processing has great potential to improve reviewing. We detail each step of the process from manuscript submission to camera-ready revision, and discuss the associated challenges and opportunities for NLP assistance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-10T16:06:43Z)
• Pair Programming Practiced in Hybrid Work [2.6680382112425383]
  Pair programming (PP) has been a widespread practice for decades and is known for facilitating knowledge exchange and improving the quality of software. Many agilists advocated the importance of collocation, face-to-face interaction, and physical artifacts incorporated in the shared workspace when pairing. After a long period of forced work-from-home, many knowledge workers prefer to work remotely two or three days per week.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-13T10:01:25Z)
• Unleashing the Emergent Cognitive Synergy in Large Language Models: A Task-Solving Agent through Multi-Persona Self-Collaboration [116.09561564489799]
  Solo Performance Prompting transforms a single LLM into a cognitive synergist by engaging in multi-turn self-collaboration with multiple personas. A cognitive synergist is an intelligent agent that collaboratively combines multiple minds' strengths and knowledge to enhance problem-solving in complex tasks. Our in-depth analysis shows that assigning multiple fine-grained personas in LLMs improves problem-solving abilities compared to using a single or fixed number of personas.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-11T14:45:19Z)
• Detecting and Optimising Team Interactions in Software Development [58.720142291102135]
  This paper presents a data-driven approach to detect the functional interaction structure for software development teams. Our approach considers differences in the activity levels of team members and uses a block-constrained configuration model. We show how our approach enables teams to compare their functional interaction structure against synthetically created benchmark scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-28T14:53:29Z)
• Who does what? Work division and allocation strategies of computer science student teams [5.863264019032882]
  The aim of this research is to gain insight into the work division and allocation strategies applied by computer science students during group assignments. Motivated primarily by grade and efficiency factors, students choose and allocate tasks based on their prior expertise and preferences. Based on our findings, we argue that the setup of group assignments can limit student motivation for practicing new software engineering skills.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-04T12:27:07Z)
• FERN: Fair Team Formation for Mutually Beneficial Collaborative Learning [9.484474204788349]
  This work introduces FERN, a fair team formation approach that promotes mutually beneficial peer learning. We show this problem as a discrete optimization problem to be NPhard and propose a hill-climbing algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-23T18:38:01Z)
• Evaluating and Rewarding Teamwork Using Cooperative Game Abstractions [103.3630903577951]
  We use cooperative game theory to study teams of artificial RL agents as well as real world teams from professional sports. We introduce a parametric model called cooperative game abstractions (CGAs) for estimating CFs from data. We provide identification results and sample bounds complexity for CGA models as well as error bounds in the estimation of the Shapley Value using CGAs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-16T22:03:36Z)
• On Emergent Communication in Competitive Multi-Agent Teams [116.95067289206919]
  We investigate whether competition for performance from an external, similar agent team could act as a social influence. Our results show that an external competitive influence leads to improved accuracy and generalization, as well as faster emergence of communicative languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-04T01:14:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.