When Domains Collide: An Activity Theory Exploration of Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.20063v3
• Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2025 01:04:34 GMT
• Title: When Domains Collide: An Activity Theory Exploration of Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration
• Abstract summary: Cross-disciplinary software development teams are increasingly diverse, embedded, and cross-disciplinary.<n> contested expectations, divergent problem-solving perspectives, and conflicting priorities lead to friction.
• Score: 10.717226526478601
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Background: Software development teams are increasingly diverse, embedded, and cross-disciplinary. Domain experts (DEs) from different disciplines collaborate with professional software developers (SDEs), bringing complementary expertise in creating and maintaining complex production software. However, contested expectations, divergent problem-solving perspectives, and conflicting priorities lead to friction. Aims: This study aims to investigate the dynamics of emerging collaboration of cross-disciplinary software development (CDSD) by exploring the expectations held by DEs and SDEs and understanding how these frictions manifest in practice. Method: We utilize Activity Theory (AT), a well-established socio-technical framework, as an analytical lens in a grounded, empirical investigation, conducted through a mixed-method study involving 24 interviews (12 DEs and 12 SDEs) and a large-scale validation survey with 293 participants (161 DEs and 132 SDEs). Results: We conceptualize and empirically ground the CDSD dynamics. We identified eight expectations held by SDEs and six by DEs. By mapping these expectations to AT components, we revealed 21 frictions in CDSD and illustrated where and how they arise. Conclusions: This study offers a theoretical lens for understanding the dynamics and frictions in CDSD and provides actionable insights for future research, practitioners, and infrastructure design.

Related papers

• CoMind: Understanding Collaborative Human Activity from Multiple Minds and Views [82.15362247351763]
  We introduce a novel egocentric and exocentric video dataset capturing real-world collaboration in cooking scenarios.<n>The dataset integrates multi-perspective video, high-quality audio, gaze tracking, and 3D scene and object scans, with annotations for shared attention to objects.<n>We establish benchmarks for Joint Attention Estimation, Socially Conditioned Object Interaction Anticipation, and Collaborative Handover Prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-07T18:08:45Z)
• Practitioner Beliefs and Behaviors in AI-Enhanced Education: DOT Framework Survey Evidence [0.0]
  The study investigates AI familiarity, usage patterns, design-oriented practices, and pedagogical beliefs.<n>Results indicate that practitioners hold favorable views of AI as a pedagogical support while maintaining strong commitments to human oversight and critical evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-27T19:42:31Z)
• From Affect to Complex Behavior: Advancing Multimodal Human-Centered AI at the 10th ABAW Workshop & Competition [60.17193786245766]
  The ABAW Competition introduces a diverse set of challenges targeting key aspects of affective and behavioral understanding.<n>The paper track presents a wide range of contributions spanning pose, motion & behavior estimation, affect modelling & multimodal learning, benchmarks, datasets & evaluation protocols, fairness, robustness & deployment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-24T17:44:37Z)
• Two Integration Pathways in Human-Centered Requirements Engineering: A Systematic Mapping Study of Structural Gaps [0.4828100588379509]
  Human-centered Requirements Engineering (HC-RE) integrates user cognition, emotions, and social interactions into the RE process.<n>This systematic mapping study analyzes 56 primary studies across seven dimensions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-05T17:17:15Z)
• Towards Knowledgeable Deep Research: Framework and Benchmark [105.87257445617922]
  This paper introduces Knowledgeable Deep Research (KDR), which requires DR agents to generate reports with both structured and unstructured knowledge.<n>We propose the Hybrid Knowledge Analysis framework (HKA), a multi-agent architecture that integrates texts, figures, and tables into coherent multimodal reports.<n> Experimental results demonstrate that HKA consistently outperforms most existing DR agents on general-purpose and knowledge-centric metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-09T02:06:27Z)
• Agentic Reasoning for Large Language Models [122.81018455095999]
  Reasoning is a fundamental cognitive process underlying inference, problem-solving, and decision-making.<n>Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate strong reasoning capabilities in closed-world settings, but struggle in open-ended and dynamic environments.<n>Agentic reasoning marks a paradigm shift by reframing LLMs as autonomous agents that plan, act, and learn through continual interaction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-18T18:58:23Z)
• Probing Scientific General Intelligence of LLMs with Scientist-Aligned Workflows [203.3527268311731]
  We present an operational SGI definition grounded in the Practical Inquiry Model (PIM)<n>We operationalize it via four scientist-aligned tasks: deep research, idea generation, dry/wet experiments, and experimental reasoning.<n>Our PIM-grounded definition, workflow-centric benchmark, and empirical insights establish a foundation for AI systems that genuinely participate in scientific discovery.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-18T12:44:36Z)
• Exploring the Technical Knowledge Interaction of Global Digital Humanities: Three-decade Evidence from Bibliometric-based perspectives [6.4731966382810215]
  This study introduces a new concept of Topic-Method Composition (TMC)<n>TMC refers to a hybrid knowledge structure generated by the co-occurrence of specific research topics and the corresponding method.<n>This study develops a workflow combining bibliometric analysis, topic modeling, and network analysis to analyze the development characteristics and patterns of research disciplines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-11T12:27:39Z)
• Stakeholder Perspectives on Digital Twin Implementation Challenges in Healthcare: Insights from a Provider Digital Twin Case Study [0.0]
  This research investigates DT implementation challenges in healthcare by capturing the perspectives of four distinct stakeholders.<n>We conducted semi-structured interviews guided by the updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR 2.0)<n>We then mapped each stakeholder group's preferences and concerns, revealing a nuanced landscape of converging and diverging perspectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-31T07:57:48Z)
• Anomaly Detection and Generation with Diffusion Models: A Survey [51.61574868316922]
  Anomaly detection (AD) plays a pivotal role across diverse domains, including cybersecurity, finance, healthcare, and industrial manufacturing.<n>Recent advancements in deep learning, specifically diffusion models (DMs), have sparked significant interest.<n>This survey aims to guide researchers and practitioners in leveraging DMs for innovative AD solutions across diverse applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-11T03:29:18Z)
• Closing the Evaluation Gap: Developing a Behavior-Oriented Framework for Assessing Virtual Teamwork Competency [6.169364905804677]
  This study develops a behavior-oriented framework for assessing virtual teamwork competencies among engineering students.<n>Using focus group interviews combined with the Critical Incident Technique, the study identified three key dimensions.<n>The resulting framework provides a foundation for more effective assessment practices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-20T08:12:27Z)
• Deep Learning in Concealed Dense Prediction [83.89736735583935]
  We introduce and review a family of complex tasks, termed Concealed Dense Prediction (CDP), which has great value in agriculture, industry, etc.<n>CDP's intrinsic trait is that the targets are concealed in their surroundings, thus fully perceiving them requires fine-grained representations, prior knowledge, auxiliary reasoning, etc.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-15T08:44:42Z)
• Multimodal Chain-of-Thought Reasoning: A Comprehensive Survey [124.23247710880008]
  multimodal CoT (MCoT) reasoning has recently garnered significant research attention.<n>Existing MCoT studies design various methodologies to address the challenges of image, video, speech, audio, 3D, and structured data.<n>We present the first systematic survey of MCoT reasoning, elucidating the relevant foundational concepts and definitions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-16T18:39:13Z)
• Fusing Physics-Driven Strategies and Cross-Modal Adversarial Learning: Toward Multi-Domain Applications [0.0]
  Cross-modal adversarial learning and physics-driven methods represent a cutting-edge direction for tackling challenges in scientific computing.<n>This review focuses on analyzing how these two approaches can be synergistically integrated to enhance performance and robustness across diverse application domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-30T03:47:17Z)
• What Could Possibly Go Wrong: Undesirable Patterns in Collective Development [4.2330023661329355]
  Various studies have attempted to capture the social dynamics within software engineering. Certain teamwork issues remain unstudied. This paper introduces the concept of undesirable patterns in collective development.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-02T15:13:18Z)
• Making Software Development More Diverse and Inclusive: Key Themes, Challenges, and Future Directions [50.545824691484796]
  We identify six themes around the theme challenges and opportunities to improve Software Developer Diversity and Inclusion (SDDI)<n>We identify benefits, harms, and future research directions for the four main themes.<n>We discuss the remaining two themes, Artificial Intelligence & SDDI and AI & Computer Science education, which have a cross-cutting effect on the other themes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-10T16:18:11Z)
• Towards Generalizing Inferences from Trials to Target Populations [6.836945436656676]
  This paper delves into the forefront of addressing external validity challenges, encapsulating a multidisciplinary workshop held at Brown University. Experts from diverse fields including social science, medicine, public health, statistics, computer science, and education, tackled the unique obstacles each discipline faces in extrapolating experimental findings. By doing so, this paper aims to enhance the collective understanding of the generalizability and transportability of causal effects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-26T21:49:44Z)
• Active Inference in Robotics and Artificial Agents: Survey and Challenges [51.29077770446286]
  We review the state-of-the-art theory and implementations of active inference for state-estimation, control, planning and learning. We showcase relevant experiments that illustrate its potential in terms of adaptation, generalization and robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-03T12:10:26Z)
• Artificial Intelligence for IT Operations (AIOPS) Workshop White Paper [50.25428141435537]
  Artificial Intelligence for IT Operations (AIOps) is an emerging interdisciplinary field arising in the intersection between machine learning, big data, streaming analytics, and the management of IT operations. Main aim of the AIOPS workshop is to bring together researchers from both academia and industry to present their experiences, results, and work in progress in this field.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-15T10:43:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.