AI-Governed Agent Architecture for Web-Trustworthy Tokenization of Alternative Assets

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.00096v1
• Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2025 11:28:51 GMT
• Title: AI-Governed Agent Architecture for Web-Trustworthy Tokenization of Alternative Assets
• Authors: Ailiya Borjigin, Wei Zhou, Cong He,
• Abstract summary: Alternative Assets tokenization is transforming non-traditional financial instruments are represented and traded on the web.<n>This paper proposes an AI-governed agent architecture that integrates intelligent agents with blockchain to achieve web-trustworthy tokenization of alternative assets.
• Score: 3.0801485631077457
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Alternative Assets tokenization is transforming non-traditional financial instruments are represented and traded on the web. However, ensuring trustworthiness in web-based tokenized ecosystems poses significant challenges, from verifying off-chain asset data to enforcing regulatory compliance. This paper proposes an AI-governed agent architecture that integrates intelligent agents with blockchain to achieve web-trustworthy tokenization of alternative assets. In the proposed architecture, autonomous agents orchestrate the tokenization process (asset verification, valuation, compliance checking, and lifecycle management), while an AI-driven governance layer monitors agent behavior and enforces trust through adaptive policies and cryptoeconomic incentives. We demonstrate that this approach enhances transparency, security, and compliance in asset tokenization, addressing key concerns around data authenticity and fraud. A case study on tokenizing real estate assets illustrates how the architecture mitigates risks (e.g., fraudulent listings and money laundering) through real-time AI anomaly detection and on-chain enforcement. Our evaluation and analysis suggest that combining AI governance with multi-agent systems and blockchain can significantly bolster trust in tokenized asset ecosystems. This work offers a novel framework for trustworthy asset tokenization on the web and provides insights for practitioners aiming to deploy secure, compliant tokenization platforms.

Related papers

• CREDIT: Certified Ownership Verification of Deep Neural Networks Against Model Extraction Attacks [54.04030169323115]
  We introduce CREDIT, a certified ownership verification against Model Extraction Attacks (MEAs)<n>We quantify the similarity between DNN models, propose a practical verification threshold, and provide rigorous theoretical guarantees for ownership verification based on this threshold.<n>We extensively evaluate our approach on several mainstream datasets across different domains and tasks, achieving state-of-the-art performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-23T23:36:25Z)
• A Blockchain-Monitored Agentic AI Architecture for Trusted Perception-Reasoning-Action Pipelines [0.0]
  The application of agentic AI systems in autonomous decision-making is growing in the areas of healthcare, smart cities, digital forensics, and supply chain management.<n>The paper suggests a single architecture model comprising of LangChain-based multi-agent system with a permissioned blockchain to guarantee constant monitoring, policy enforcement, and immutable auditability of agentic action.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-24T06:20:28Z)
• Binding Agent ID: Unleashing the Power of AI Agents with accountability and credibility [46.323590135279126]
  BAID (Binding Agent ID) is a comprehensive identity infrastructure establishing verifiable user-code binding.<n>We implement and evaluate a complete prototype system, demonstrating the practical feasibility of blockchain-based identity management and zkVM-based authentication protocol.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-19T13:01:54Z)
• A Technical Policy Blueprint for Trustworthy Decentralized AI [29.298499284846844]
  We propose a Technical Policy Blueprint that encodes governance requirements as policy-as-code objects.<n>We are proposing a Technical Policy Blueprint that separates asset policy verification from asset policy enforcement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-07T21:27:48Z)
• Secure Autonomous Agent Payments: Verifying Authenticity and Intent in a Trustless Environment [0.0]
  Artificial intelligence (AI) agents are increasingly capable of initiating financial transactions on behalf of users or other agents.<n>Traditional payment systems assume human authorization, but autonomous, agent-led payments remove that safeguard.<n>This paper presents a blockchain-based framework that cryptographically authenticates and verifies the intent of every AI-initiated transaction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-08T19:53:51Z)
• Agentic AI for Financial Crime Compliance [0.0]
  This paper presents the design and deployment of an agentic AI system for financial crime compliance (FCC) in digitally native financial platforms.<n>The contribution includes a reference architecture, a real-world prototype, and insights into how Agentic AI can reconfigure under regulatory constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-16T14:53:51Z)
• Safe and Certifiable AI Systems: Concepts, Challenges, and Lessons Learned [45.44933002008943]
  This white paper presents the T"UV AUSTRIA Trusted AI framework.<n>It is an end-to-end audit catalog and methodology for assessing and certifying machine learning systems.<n>Building on three pillars - Secure Software Development, Functional Requirements, and Ethics & Data Privacy - it translates the high-level obligations of the EU AI Act into specific, testable criteria.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-08T17:52:08Z)
• Using the NANDA Index Architecture in Practice: An Enterprise Perspective [9.707223291705601]
  The proliferation of autonomous AI agents represents a paradigmatic shift from traditional web architectures toward collaborative intelligent systems.<n>This paper presents a comprehensive framework addressing the fundamental infrastructure requirements for secure, trustworthy, and interoperable AI agent ecosystems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-05T05:27:27Z)
• AI Agent Architecture for Decentralized Trading of Alternative Assets [2.8195433571821162]
  GoldMine OS is a research oriented architecture that employs multiple specialized AI agents to automate and secure the tokenization and exchange of physical gold into a blockchain based stablecoin ("OZ")<n>We describe four cooperative agents (Compliance, Token Issuance, Market Making, and Risk Control) and a coordinating core, and evaluate the system through simulation and a controlled pilot deployment.<n>In experiments the prototype delivers on demand token issuance in under 1.2 s, more than 100 times faster than manual.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-15T09:11:19Z)
• Endorsement-Driven Blockchain SSI Framework for Dynamic IoT Ecosystems [0.39462888523270856]
  Self-Sovereign Identity (SSI) offers significant potential for managing identities in the Internet of Things (IoT)<n>Existing SSI frameworks limit issuance credential and revocation to trusted entities, such as IoT manufacturers.<n>We propose a blockchain-based SSI framework that allows any individual with a verifiable trust linkage to act as a credential issuer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-14T02:03:14Z)
• Building crypto portfolios with agentic AI [46.348283638884425]
  The rapid growth of crypto markets has opened new opportunities for investors, but at the same time exposed them to high volatility.<n>This paper presents a practical application of a multi-agent system designed to autonomously construct and evaluate crypto-asset allocations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-11T18:03:51Z)
• LLM Agents Should Employ Security Principles [60.03651084139836]
  This paper argues that the well-established design principles in information security should be employed when deploying Large Language Model (LLM) agents at scale.<n>We introduce AgentSandbox, a conceptual framework embedding these security principles to provide safeguards throughout an agent's life-cycle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T21:39:08Z)
• Zero-Trust Foundation Models: A New Paradigm for Secure and Collaborative Artificial Intelligence for Internet of Things [61.43014629640404]
  Zero-Trust Foundation Models (ZTFMs) embed zero-trust security principles into the lifecycle of foundation models (FMs) for Internet of Things (IoT) systems.<n>ZTFMs can enable secure, privacy-preserving AI across distributed, heterogeneous, and potentially adversarial IoT environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T06:44:31Z)
• A Novel Zero-Trust Identity Framework for Agentic AI: Decentralized Authentication and Fine-Grained Access Control [7.228060525494563]
  This paper posits the imperative for a novel Agentic AI IAM framework.<n>We propose a comprehensive framework built upon rich, verifiable Agent Identities (IDs)<n>We also explore how Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs) enable privacy-preserving attribute disclosure and verifiable policy compliance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-25T20:21:55Z)
• Artificial Intelligence in Government: Why People Feel They Lose Control [44.99833362998488]
  The use of Artificial Intelligence in public administration is expanding rapidly.<n>While AI promises greater efficiency and responsiveness, its integration into government functions raises concerns about fairness, transparency, and accountability.<n>This article applies principal-agent theory to AI adoption as a special case of delegation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-02T07:46:41Z)
• Enhancing Trust in AI Marketplaces: Evaluating On-Chain Verification of Personalized AI models using zk-SNARKs [8.458944388986067]
  This paper addresses the challenge of verifying personalized AI models in decentralized environments.<n>We propose a novel framework that integrates zero-knowledge succinct non-interactive arguments of knowledge (zk-SNARKs) with Chainlink decentralized oracles.<n>Our results indicate the framework's efficacy, with key metrics including proof generation taking an average of 233.63 seconds and verification time of 61.50 seconds.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-07T07:38:29Z)
• Blockchain As a Platform For Artificial Intelligence (AI) Transparency [0.0]
  "Black box" problem in AI decision-making limits stakeholders' ability to understand, trust, and verify outcomes.<n>This paper explores the integration of blockchain with AI to improve decision traceability, provenance data, and model accountability.<n>Findings suggest that blockchain could be a technology for ensuring AI systems remain accountable, ethical, and aligned with regulatory standards.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-07T01:57:26Z)
• Balancing Confidentiality and Transparency for Blockchain-based Process-Aware Information Systems [46.404531555921906]
  We propose an architecture for blockchain-based PAISs aimed at preserving both confidentiality and transparency.<n>Smart contracts enact, enforce and store public interactions, while attribute-based encryption techniques are adopted to specify access grants to confidential information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-07T20:18:36Z)
• Meta-Sealing: A Revolutionizing Integrity Assurance Protocol for Transparent, Tamper-Proof, and Trustworthy AI System [0.0]
  This research introduces Meta-Sealing, a cryptographic framework that fundamentally changes integrity verification in AI systems. The framework combines advanced cryptography with distributed verification, delivering tamper-evident guarantees that achieve both mathematical rigor and computational efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-31T15:31:22Z)
• FedSOV: Federated Model Secure Ownership Verification with Unforgeable Signature [60.99054146321459]
  Federated learning allows multiple parties to collaborate in learning a global model without revealing private data. We propose a cryptographic signature-based federated learning model ownership verification scheme named FedSOV.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-10T12:10:02Z)
• Toward Trustworthy AI Development: Mechanisms for Supporting Verifiable Claims [59.64274607533249]
  AI developers need to make verifiable claims to which they can be held accountable. This report suggests various steps that different stakeholders can take to improve the verifiability of claims made about AI systems. We analyze ten mechanisms for this purpose--spanning institutions, software, and hardware--and make recommendations aimed at implementing, exploring, or improving those mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-15T17:15:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.