WebArXiv: Evaluating Multimodal Agents on Time-Invariant arXiv Tasks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.00938v2
• Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2025 09:05:05 GMT
• Title: WebArXiv: Evaluating Multimodal Agents on Time-Invariant arXiv Tasks
• Authors: Zihao Sun, Ling Chen,
• Abstract summary: We introduce WebArXiv, a benchmark for evaluating autonomous web agents.<n>WebArXiv consists of 275 web-based tasks grounded in the arXiv platform.<n>We propose a lightweight dynamic reflection mechanism that allows agents to selectively retrieve relevant past steps.
• Score: 7.4706262500758385
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Recent progress in large language models (LLMs) has enabled the development of autonomous web agents capable of navigating and interacting with real websites. However, evaluating such agents remains challenging due to the instability and inconsistency of existing benchmarks, which often rely on dynamic content or oversimplified simulations. In this work, we introduce WebArXiv, a static and time-invariant benchmark comprising 275 web-based tasks grounded in the arXiv platform. WebArXiv ensures reproducible and reliable evaluation by anchoring tasks in fixed web snapshots with deterministic ground truths and standardized action trajectories. Through behavioral analysis, we identify a common failure mode, Rigid History Reflection, where agents over-rely on fixed interaction histories. To address this, we propose a lightweight dynamic reflection mechanism that allows agents to selectively retrieve relevant past steps during decision-making. We evaluate ten state-of-the-art web agents on WebArXiv. Results demonstrate clear performance differences across agents and validate the effectiveness of our proposed reflection strategy.

Related papers

• The Why Behind the Action: Unveiling Internal Drivers via Agentic Attribution [63.61358761489141]
  Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents are widely used in real-world applications such as customer service, web navigation, and software engineering.<n>We propose a novel framework for textbfgeneral agentic attribution, designed to identify the internal factors driving agent actions regardless of the task outcome.<n>We validate our framework across a diverse suite of agentic scenarios, including standard tool use and subtle reliability risks like memory-induced bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-21T15:22:21Z)
• WebGraphEval: Multi-Turn Trajectory Evaluation for Web Agents using Graph Representation [13.14840279219976]
  We present WebGraphEval, a framework that abstracts trajectories from multiple agents into a unified, weighted action graph.<n>We show that WebGraphEval captures cross-model regularities, highlights redundancy and inefficiency, and identifies critical decision points overlooked by outcome-based metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-22T03:29:25Z)
• WebDevJudge: Evaluating (M)LLMs as Critiques for Web Development Quality [62.43165871914528]
  We introduce WebDevJudge, a systematic benchmark for assessing LLM-as-a-judge performance in web development.<n>WebDevJudge comprises human preference labels over paired web implementations, annotated with structured and query-grounded rubrics.<n>In-depth analysis indicates this gap stems from fundamental model limitations, including failures in recognizing functional equivalence, verifying task feasibility, and mitigating bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-21T12:16:04Z)
• BrowserArena: Evaluating LLM Agents on Real-World Web Navigation Tasks [51.803138848305814]
  We introduce BrowserArena, a live open-web agent evaluation platform that collects user-submitted tasks.<n>We identify three consistent failure modes: captcha resolution, pop-up banner removal, and direct navigation to URLs.<n>Our findings surface both the diversity and brittleness of current web agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-02T15:22:21Z)
• WebSynthesis: World-Model-Guided MCTS for Efficient WebUI-Trajectory Synthesis [34.998277998052444]
  We propose WebSynthesis, a novel framework for trajectory synthesis and training.<n>We show that an agent trained using WebSynthesis on a small-scale synthetic dataset achieves performance comparable to or even surpassing that of models trained on large-scale real-world data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-06T12:31:10Z)
• Less is More: Empowering GUI Agent with Context-Aware Simplification [62.02157661751793]
  We propose a context-aware framework for building an efficient and effective GUI Agent, termed SimpAgent.<n>With the above components, SimpAgent reduces 27% FLOPs and achieves superior GUI navigation performances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-04T17:37:15Z)
• Thinking vs. Doing: Agents that Reason by Scaling Test-Time Interaction [46.286440953594266]
  We propose to scale test-time interaction, an untapped dimension of test-time scaling.<n>We first show that even prompting-based interaction scaling can improve task success on web benchmarks non-trivially.<n>We introduce TTI (Test-Time Interaction), a curriculum-based online reinforcement learning approach that trains agents by adaptively adjusting their rollout lengths.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-09T17:50:02Z)
• WebCoT: Enhancing Web Agent Reasoning by Reconstructing Chain-of-Thought in Reflection, Branching, and Rollback [74.82886755416949]
  We identify key reasoning skills essential for effective web agents.<n>We reconstruct the agent's reasoning algorithms into chain-of-thought rationales.<n>Our approach yields significant improvements across multiple benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T14:03:37Z)
• Enhancing Web Agents with Explicit Rollback Mechanisms [55.276852838877346]
  We enhance web agents with an explicit rollback mechanism, enabling the agent to revert back to a previous state in its navigation trajectory.<n>This mechanism gives the model the flexibility to directly control the search process, leading to an effective and efficient web navigation method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-16T05:41:20Z)
• REAL: Benchmarking Autonomous Agents on Deterministic Simulations of Real Websites [9.58858258192147]
  We introduce REAL, a benchmark and framework for multi-turn agent evaluations on deterministic simulations of real-world websites.<n>We also release a benchmark consisting of 112 practical tasks that mirror everyday complex user interactions.<n>Our framework supports easy integration of new tasks, reproducible evaluation, and scalable post-training data generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-15T18:22:55Z)
• The BrowserGym Ecosystem for Web Agent Research [151.90034093362343]
  BrowserGym ecosystem addresses the growing need for efficient evaluation and benchmarking of web agents.<n>We propose an extended BrowserGym-based ecosystem for web agent research, which unifies existing benchmarks from the literature.<n>We conduct the first large-scale, multi-benchmark web agent experiment and compare the performance of 6 state-of-the-art LLMs across 6 popular web agent benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-06T23:43:59Z)
• Dissecting Adversarial Robustness of Multimodal LM Agents [70.2077308846307]
  We manually create 200 targeted adversarial tasks and evaluation scripts in a realistic threat model on top of VisualWebArena.<n>We find that we can successfully break latest agents that use black-box frontier LMs, including those that perform reflection and tree search.<n>We also use ARE to rigorously evaluate how the robustness changes as new components are added.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-18T17:32:48Z)
• LASER: LLM Agent with State-Space Exploration for Web Navigation [57.802977310392755]
  Large language models (LLMs) have been successfully adapted for interactive decision-making tasks like web navigation. Previous methods implicitly assume a forward-only execution mode for the model, where they only provide oracle trajectories as in-context examples. We propose to model the interactive task as state space exploration, where the LLM agent transitions among a pre-defined set of states by performing actions to complete the task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-15T05:44:08Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.