StressWeb: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Web Agent Robustness under Realistic Interaction Variability

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.16385v1
• Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2026 02:41:38 GMT
• Title: StressWeb: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Web Agent Robustness under Realistic Interaction Variability
• Abstract summary: We introduce a diagnostic stress-testing benchmark for web agents.<n>We show that stress-based evaluation exposes failure modes and substantial robustness gaps that remain hidden under clean benchmark conditions.
• Score: 19.48798134080834
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language model-based web agents have demonstrated strong performance on realistic web interaction tasks. However, existing evaluations are predominantly conducted under relatively stable and well-behaved interaction conditions, which may overestimate agent robustness. High task success in such idealized settings does not necessarily reflect performance under realistic web interaction. To address this limitation, we introduce a diagnostic stress-testing benchmark for web agents. We first construct realistic and controllable web environments that provide clean and stable interaction workflows as reference baselines. We then introduce structured and controlled perturbations that emulate interaction variability, including shifting layouts, altered interaction semantics, and execution disruptions. By comparing agent behavior between clean and perturbed settings, our framework enables systematic diagnosis of robustness under what-if interaction scenarios. Through extensive evaluation of state-of-the-art multimodal web agents, we show that stress-based evaluation exposes failure modes and substantial robustness gaps that remain hidden under clean benchmark conditions.

Related papers

• Behaviorally Adaptive Visual Diversion for Inclusive and Resilient Digital Assessment Delivery [0.0]
  This paper introduces Behaviorally-Adaptive Visual Diversion (BAVD), a theoretical framework in which a synthetic, non-semantic visual field is composited with assessment content.<n>BAVD incorporates an accessibility-aware mechanism that reduces or suppresses diversion intensity for candidates with approved visual-processing accommodations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-04T12:13:25Z)
• ScrambleToolBench: Agents Search Exhaustively Even When Their Own Map Points to the Next Step [74.83535434786145]
  We introduce ScrambleToolBench, an interactive terminal benchmark designed to isolate behavioral reasoning.<n>The benchmark requires agents to uncover hidden tool behaviors entirely through trial-and-error interaction.<n>Our evaluation of state-of-the-art language models reveals that successful initial discovery does not translate into robust adaptation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-03T15:07:46Z)
• ARdena: Scenario-driven control of real-time LLM agents [0.0]
  This paper introduces layered scenario-driven LLM control, a framework that enables runtime behavior control through structured prompting.<n>The framework is implemented in ARDena, a real-time multimodal embodied agent that integrates speech interaction, visual perception, tool use, and avatar-based response generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-26T08:58:33Z)
• Learning to Act under Noise: Enhancing Agent Robustness via Noisy Environments [68.02342920827135]
  We propose NoisyAgent, an agentic training framework that explicitly incorporates environmental imperfections into the agent learning process.<n>We identify two major sources of interaction noise in real-world scenarios: user noise, which captures ambiguity and variability in user interaction, and tool noise, which reflects failures and anomalies in tool execution.<n>Extensive experiments demonstrate that our approach consistently improves agent robustness under noisy and dynamic environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-26T16:02:00Z)
• InteractWeb-Bench: Can Multimodal Agent Escape Blind Execution in Interactive Website Generation? [20.180246350877045]
  Real-world development is constrained by a critical bottleneck: the semantic misalignment between ambiguous, low-quality instructions from non-expert users and model understanding.<n>We introduce InteractWeb-Bench, the first multimodal interactive benchmark for website generation under non-expert low-code user conditions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-30T04:49:34Z)
• Adversarial Moral Stress Testing of Large Language Models [6.225703352031606]
  This paper introduces Adversarial Moral Stress Testing (AMST), a stress-based evaluation framework for assessing ethical robustness under adversarial multi-round interactions.<n>We evaluate AMST on several state-of-the-art LLMs, including LLaMA-3-8B, GPT-4o, and DeepSeek-v3, using a large set of adversarial scenarios generated under controlled stress conditions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-01T16:34:20Z)
• From Perception to Action: An Interactive Benchmark for Vision Reasoning [51.11355591375073]
  Causal Hierarchy of Actions and Interactions (CHAIN) benchmark designed to evaluate whether models can understand, plan, and execute structured action sequences grounded in physical constraints.<n> CHAIN shifts evaluation from passive perception to active problem solving, spanning tasks such as interlocking mechanical puzzles and 3D stacking and packing.<n>Our results show that top-performing models still struggle to internalize physical structure and causal constraints, often failing to produce reliable long-horizon plans and cannot robustly translate perceived structure into effective actions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-24T15:33:02Z)
• AgentNoiseBench: Benchmarking Robustness of Tool-Using LLM Agents Under Noisy Condition [72.24180896265192]
  We introduce AgentNoiseBench, a framework for evaluating robustness of agentic models under noisy environments.<n>We first conduct an in-depth analysis of biases and uncertainties in real-world scenarios.<n>We then categorize environmental noise into two primary types: user-noise and tool-noise.<n>Building on this analysis, we develop an automated pipeline that injects controllable noise into existing agent-centric benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-11T20:33:10Z)
• The Why Behind the Action: Unveiling Internal Drivers via Agentic Attribution [63.61358761489141]
  Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents are widely used in real-world applications such as customer service, web navigation, and software engineering.<n>We propose a novel framework for textbfgeneral agentic attribution, designed to identify the internal factors driving agent actions regardless of the task outcome.<n>We validate our framework across a diverse suite of agentic scenarios, including standard tool use and subtle reliability risks like memory-induced bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-21T15:22:21Z)
• WebDevJudge: Evaluating (M)LLMs as Critiques for Web Development Quality [62.43165871914528]
  We introduce WebDevJudge, a systematic benchmark for assessing LLM-as-a-judge performance in web development.<n>WebDevJudge comprises human preference labels over paired web implementations, annotated with structured and query-grounded rubrics.<n>In-depth analysis indicates this gap stems from fundamental model limitations, including failures in recognizing functional equivalence, verifying task feasibility, and mitigating bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-21T12:16:04Z)
• WebArXiv: Evaluating Multimodal Agents on Time-Invariant arXiv Tasks [7.4706262500758385]
  We introduce WebArXiv, a benchmark for evaluating autonomous web agents.<n>WebArXiv consists of 275 web-based tasks grounded in the arXiv platform.<n>We propose a lightweight dynamic reflection mechanism that allows agents to selectively retrieve relevant past steps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-01T16:43:57Z)
• REAL: Benchmarking Autonomous Agents on Deterministic Simulations of Real Websites [9.58858258192147]
  We introduce REAL, a benchmark and framework for multi-turn agent evaluations on deterministic simulations of real-world websites.<n>We also release a benchmark consisting of 112 practical tasks that mirror everyday complex user interactions.<n>Our framework supports easy integration of new tasks, reproducible evaluation, and scalable post-training data generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-15T18:22:55Z)
• Collaborative Value Function Estimation Under Model Mismatch: A Federated Temporal Difference Analysis [55.13545823385091]
  Federated reinforcement learning (FedRL) enables collaborative learning while preserving data privacy by preventing direct data exchange between agents.<n>In real-world applications, each agent may experience slightly different transition dynamics, leading to inherent model mismatches.<n>We show that even moderate levels of information sharing significantly mitigate environment-specific errors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-21T18:06:28Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.