Assessing Small Language Models for Code Generation: An Empirical Study with Benchmarks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.03160v3
• Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2025 06:49:35 GMT
• Title: Assessing Small Language Models for Code Generation: An Empirical Study with Benchmarks
• Authors: Md Mahade Hasan, Muhammad Waseem, Kai-Kristian Kemell, Jussi Rasku, Juha Ala-Rantala, Pekka Abrahamsson,
• Abstract summary: Small Language Models (SLMs) offer lightweight and cost-effective alternatives to Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>This study presents a comprehensive empirical evaluation of 20 open-source SLMs ranging from 0.4B to 10B parameters on five code-related benchmarks.
• Score: 4.448709087838503
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: The recent advancements of Small Language Models (SLMs) have opened new possibilities for efficient code generation. SLMs offer lightweight and cost-effective alternatives to Large Language Models (LLMs), making them attractive for use in resource-constrained environments. However, empirical understanding of SLMs, particularly their capabilities, limitations, and performance trade-offs in code generation remains limited. This study presents a comprehensive empirical evaluation of 20 open-source SLMs ranging from 0.4B to 10B parameters on five diverse code-related benchmarks (HumanEval, MBPP, Mercury, HumanEvalPack, and CodeXGLUE). The models are assessed along three dimensions: i) functional correctness of generated code, ii) computational efficiency and iii) performance across multiple programming languages. The findings of this study reveal that several compact SLMs achieve competitive results while maintaining a balance between performance and efficiency, making them viable for deployment in resource-constrained environments. However, achieving further improvements in accuracy requires switching to larger models. These models generally outperform their smaller counterparts, but they require much more computational power. We observe that for 10% performance improvements, models can require nearly a 4x increase in VRAM consumption, highlighting a trade-off between effectiveness and scalability. Besides, the multilingual performance analysis reveals that SLMs tend to perform better in languages such as Python, Java, and PHP, while exhibiting relatively weaker performance in Go, C++, and Ruby. However, statistical analysis suggests these differences are not significant, indicating a generalizability of SLMs across programming languages. Based on the findings, this work provides insights into the design and selection of SLMs for real-world code generation tasks.

Related papers

• Syntactic and Semantic Control of Large Language Models via Sequential Monte Carlo [90.78001821963008]
  A wide range of LM applications require generating text that conforms to syntactic or semantic constraints.<n>We develop an architecture for controlled LM generation based on sequential Monte Carlo (SMC)<n>Our system builds on the framework of Lew et al. (2023) and integrates with its language model probabilistic programming language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-17T17:49:40Z)
• Small Models, Big Impact: Efficient Corpus and Graph-Based Adaptation of Small Multilingual Language Models for Low-Resource Languages [10.418542753869433]
  Low-resource languages (LRLs) face significant challenges in natural language processing (NLP) due to limited data.<n>Current state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) still struggle with LRLs.<n>Small multilingual models (mLMs) such as mBERT and XLM-R offer greater promise due to a better fit of their capacity to low training data sizes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-14T13:10:39Z)
• Enhancing Code Generation for Low-Resource Languages: No Silver Bullet [55.39571645315926]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) rely on large and diverse datasets to learn syntax, semantics, and usage patterns of programming languages.<n>For low-resource languages, the limited availability of such data hampers the models' ability to generalize effectively.<n>We present an empirical study investigating the effectiveness of several approaches for boosting LLMs' performance on low-resource languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-31T12:23:28Z)
• Adaptive Pruning for Large Language Models with Structural Importance Awareness [66.2690963378878]
  Large language models (LLMs) have significantly improved language understanding and generation capabilities.<n>LLMs are difficult to deploy on resource-constrained edge devices due to their high computational and storage resource demands.<n>We propose structurally-aware adaptive pruning (SAAP) to significantly reduce the computational and memory costs while maintaining model performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-19T18:08:04Z)
• EMMA: Efficient Visual Alignment in Multi-Modal LLMs [56.03417732498859]
  EMMA is a lightweight cross-modality module designed to efficiently fuse visual and textual encodings.<n>EMMA boosts performance across multiple tasks by up to 9.3% while significantly improving robustness against hallucinations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-02T23:00:31Z)
• Achieving Peak Performance for Large Language Models: A Systematic Review [0.0]
  Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success in natural language processing (NLP) As models grow into the trillion- parameter range, computational and memory costs increase significantly. This makes it difficult for many researchers to access the resources needed to train or apply these models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-07T13:57:41Z)
• Unlocking the Potential of Model Merging for Low-Resource Languages [66.7716891808697]
  Adapting large language models to new languages typically involves continual pre-training (CT) followed by supervised fine-tuning (SFT) We propose model merging as an alternative for low-resource languages, combining models with distinct capabilities into a single model without additional training. Experiments based on Llama-2-7B demonstrate that model merging effectively endows LLMs for low-resource languages with task-solving abilities, outperforming CT-then-SFT in scenarios with extremely scarce data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-04T15:14:17Z)
• Automated Commit Message Generation with Large Language Models: An Empirical Study and Beyond [24.151927600694066]
  Commit Message Generation (CMG) approaches aim to automatically generate commit messages based on given code diffs. This paper conducts the first comprehensive experiment to investigate how far we have been in applying Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate high-quality commit messages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-23T08:24:43Z)
• Empirical Studies of Parameter Efficient Methods for Large Language Models of Code and Knowledge Transfer to R [1.9799527196428242]
  We evaluate PEFT methods, LoRA, Compacter, and IA3 on Large Language Models for code summarization and generation.<n>Our experiments reveal that LoRA consistently outperforms Compacter and IA3 in all settings.<n>Our study can direct future research in developing code intelligent tasks for unseen languages including R.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-16T03:12:45Z)
• CoLLiE: Collaborative Training of Large Language Models in an Efficient Way [59.09824823710863]
  CoLLiE is an efficient library that facilitates collaborative training of large language models. With its modular design and comprehensive functionality, CoLLiE offers a balanced blend of efficiency, ease of use, and customization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-01T08:02:16Z)
• Cross-lingual Transfer in Programming Languages: An Extensive Empirical Study [5.350495525141013]
  Large language models (LLMs) have achieved state-of-the-art performance in various software engineering tasks.<n>critical languages, such as Rust and Swift, remain low-resource due to limited openly available code.<n>We develop a performance prediction model to guess the best source languages for a given target and task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-25T19:04:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.