Beyond Weaponization: NLP Security for Medium and Lower-Resourced Languages in Their Own Right

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.03473v1
• Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2025 10:54:04 GMT
• Title: Beyond Weaponization: NLP Security for Medium and Lower-Resourced Languages in Their Own Right
• Authors: Heather Lent,
• Abstract summary: This work examines the security of LMs for lower- and medium-resourced languages.<n>We extend existing adversarial attacks for up to 70 languages to evaluate the security of monolingual and multilingual LMs for these languages.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Despite mounting evidence that multilinguality can be easily weaponized against language models (LMs), works across NLP Security remain overwhelmingly English-centric. In terms of securing LMs, the NLP norm of "English first" collides with standard procedure in cybersecurity, whereby practitioners are expected to anticipate and prepare for worst-case outcomes. To mitigate worst-case outcomes in NLP Security, researchers must be willing to engage with the weakest links in LM security: lower-resourced languages. Accordingly, this work examines the security of LMs for lower- and medium-resourced languages. We extend existing adversarial attacks for up to 70 languages to evaluate the security of monolingual and multilingual LMs for these languages. Through our analysis, we find that monolingual models are often too small in total number of parameters to ensure sound security, and that while multilinguality is helpful, it does not always guarantee improved security either. Ultimately, these findings highlight important considerations for more secure deployment of LMs, for communities of lower-resourced languages.

Related papers

• Evaluating LLMs Robustness in Less Resourced Languages with Proxy Models [0.0]
  We show how surprisingly strong attacks can be created by altering just a few characters and using a small proxy model for word importance calculation.<n>We find that these character and word-level attacks drastically alter the predictions of different LLMs.<n>We validate our attack construction methodology on Polish, a low-resource language, and find potential vulnerabilities of LLMs in this language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-09T11:09:39Z)
• MPO: Multilingual Safety Alignment via Reward Gap Optimization [88.76638442683391]
  Large language models (LLMs) have become increasingly central to AI applications worldwide.<n>Existing preference learning methods for safety alignment, such as RLHF and DPO, are primarily monolingual and struggle with noisy multilingual data.<n>We introduce Multilingual reward gaP Optimization (MPO), a novel approach that leverages the well-aligned safety capabilities of the dominant language (English) to improve safety alignment across multiple languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-22T16:24:51Z)
• MrGuard: A Multilingual Reasoning Guardrail for Universal LLM Safety [56.79292318645454]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are susceptible to adversarial attacks such as jailbreaking.<n>This vulnerability is exacerbated in multilingual settings, where multilingual safety-aligned data is often limited.<n>We introduce a multilingual guardrail with reasoning for prompt classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-21T17:15:06Z)
• LLMs Lost in Translation: M-ALERT uncovers Cross-Linguistic Safety Inconsistencies [63.10843814055688]
  M-ALERT is a benchmark that evaluates the safety of Large Language Models in five languages.<n>M-ALERT includes 15k high-quality prompts per language, totaling 75k, with category-wise annotations.<n>Our experiments on 39 state-of-the-art LLMs highlight the importance of language-specific safety analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-19T16:46:54Z)
• The Language Barrier: Dissecting Safety Challenges of LLMs in Multilingual Contexts [46.089025223336854]
  This paper examines the variations in safety challenges faced by large language models across different languages. We compare how state-of-the-art LLMs respond to the same set of malicious prompts written in higher- vs. lower-resource languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-23T23:12:09Z)
• Text Embedding Inversion Security for Multilingual Language Models [2.790855523145802]
  Research shows that text can be reconstructed from embeddings, even without knowledge of the underlying model. This study is the first to investigate multilingual inversion attacks, shedding light on the differences in attacks and defenses across monolingual and multilingual settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-22T18:34:42Z)
• Multilingual Jailbreak Challenges in Large Language Models [96.74878032417054]
  In this study, we reveal the presence of multilingual jailbreak challenges within large language models (LLMs) We consider two potential risky scenarios: unintentional and intentional. We propose a novel textscSelf-Defense framework that automatically generates multilingual training data for safety fine-tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-10T09:44:06Z)
• Low-Resource Languages Jailbreak GPT-4 [19.97929171158234]
  Our work exposes the inherent cross-lingual vulnerability of AI safety training and red-teaming of large language models (LLMs) On the AdvBenchmark, GPT-4 engages with the unsafe translated inputs and provides actionable items that can get the users towards their harmful goals 79% of the time. Other high-/mid-resource languages have significantly lower attack success rate, which suggests that the cross-lingual vulnerability mainly applies to low-resource languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-03T21:30:56Z)
• All Languages Matter: On the Multilingual Safety of Large Language Models [96.47607891042523]
  We build the first multilingual safety benchmark for large language models (LLMs) XSafety covers 14 kinds of commonly used safety issues across 10 languages that span several language families. We propose several simple and effective prompting methods to improve the multilingual safety of ChatGPT.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-02T05:23:34Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.