ArtifactsBench: Bridging the Visual-Interactive Gap in LLM Code Generation Evaluation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.04952v1
• Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2025 12:53:00 GMT
• Title: ArtifactsBench: Bridging the Visual-Interactive Gap in LLM Code Generation Evaluation
• Authors: Chenchen Zhang, Yuhang Li, Can Xu, Jiaheng Liu, Ao Liu, Shihui Hu, Dengpeng Wu, Guanhua Huang, Kejiao Li, Qi Yi, Ruibin Xiong, Haotian Zhu, Yuanxing Zhang, Yuhao Jiang, Yue Zhang, Zenan Xu, Bohui Zhai, Guoxiang He, Hebin Li, Jie Zhao, Le Zhang, Lingyun Tan, Pengyu Guo, Xianshu Pang, Yang Ruan, Zhifeng Zhang, Zhonghu Wang, Ziyan Xu, Zuopu Yin, Wiggin Zhou, Chayse Zhou, Fengzong Lian,
• Abstract summary: ArtifactsBench is a framework for automated visual code generation evaluation.<n>Our framework renders each generated artifact and captures its dynamic behavior through temporal screenshots.<n>We construct a new benchmark of 1,825 diverse tasks and evaluate over 30 leading Large Language Models.
• Score: 48.24550684610705
• License: http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
• Abstract: The generative capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) are rapidly expanding from static code to dynamic, interactive visual artifacts. This progress is bottlenecked by a critical evaluation gap: established benchmarks focus on algorithmic correctness and are blind to the visual fidelity and interactive integrity that define modern user experiences. To bridge this gap, we introduce ArtifactsBench, a new benchmark and paradigm for the automated, multimodal evaluation of visual code generation. Our framework programmatically renders each generated artifact and captures its dynamic behavior through temporal screenshots. This visual evidence, alongside the source code, is then assessed by a Multimodal LLM (MLLM)-as-Judge, which is rigorously guided by a fine-grained, per-task checklist to ensure holistic and reproducible scoring. We construct a new benchmark of 1,825 diverse tasks and evaluate over 30 leading LLMs. Our automated evaluation achieves a striking 94.4% ranking consistency with WebDev Arena, the gold-standard for human preference in web development, and over 90% pairwise agreement with human experts. This establishes ArtifactsBench as the first framework to reliably automate the assessment of human-perceived quality at scale. Our analysis provides a high-resolution map of the current SOTA, revealing that generalist models often outperform domain-specific ones. We open-source ArtifactsBench, including the benchmark, evaluation harness, and baseline results at https://artifactsbenchmark.github.io/, to provide the community with a scalable and accurate tool to accelerate the development of user-centric generative models.

Related papers

• FrontendBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on Front-End Development via Automatic Evaluation [17.64876163735292]
  FrontendBench is a benchmark co-developed by humans and Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>The benchmark comprises 148 meticulously crafted prompt-test case pairs spanning five levels of web components.<n>An automatic evaluation framework executes generated code within a sandbox environment and assesses outcomes using predefined test scripts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-16T03:20:31Z)
• What Limits Virtual Agent Application? OmniBench: A Scalable Multi-Dimensional Benchmark for Essential Virtual Agent Capabilities [56.646832992178105]
  We introduce OmniBench, a cross-platform, graph-based benchmark with an automated pipeline for synthesizing tasks of controllable complexity.<n>We present OmniEval, a multidimensional evaluation framework that includes subtask-level evaluation, graph-based metrics, and comprehensive tests across 10 capabilities.<n>Our dataset contains 36k graph-structured tasks across 20 scenarios, achieving a 91% human acceptance rate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-10T15:59:38Z)
• EOC-Bench: Can MLLMs Identify, Recall, and Forecast Objects in an Egocentric World? [52.99661576320663]
  multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have driven breakthroughs in egocentric vision applications.<n>EOC-Bench is an innovative benchmark designed to systematically evaluate object-centric embodied cognition in dynamic egocentric scenarios.<n>We conduct comprehensive evaluations of various proprietary, open-source, and object-level MLLMs based on EOC-Bench.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-05T17:44:12Z)
• OmniGenBench: A Benchmark for Omnipotent Multimodal Generation across 50+ Tasks [77.19223035769248]
  Recent breakthroughs in large multimodal models (LMMs) have demonstrated remarkable proficiency in following general-purpose instructions for image generation.<n>We introduce OmniGenBench, a novel benchmark meticulously designed to assess the instruction-following abilities of state-of-the-art LMMs.<n>Our OmniGenBench includes 57 diverse sub-tasks grounded in real-world scenarios, systematically categorized according to the specific model capabilities they demand.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-24T16:29:34Z)
• TestAgent: A Framework for Domain-Adaptive Evaluation of LLMs via Dynamic Benchmark Construction and Exploratory Interaction [29.72874725703848]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed to various vertical domains.<n>Current evaluation methods rely on static and resource-intensive datasets that are not aligned with real-world requirements.<n>We introduce two key concepts: textbfBenchmark+, which extends the traditional question-answer benchmark into a more flexible strategy-criterion'' format.<n>We propose textbftextscTestAgent, an agent-based evaluation framework that implements these concepts using retrieval-augmented generation and reinforcement learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-15T11:20:42Z)
• LiveXiv -- A Multi-Modal Live Benchmark Based on Arxiv Papers Content [62.816876067499415]
  We propose LiveXiv: a scalable evolving live benchmark based on scientific ArXiv papers.<n>LiveXiv accesses domain-specific manuscripts at any given timestamp and proposes to automatically generate visual question-answer pairs.<n>We benchmark multiple open and proprietary Large Multi-modal Models (LMMs) on the first version of our benchmark, showing its challenging nature and exposing the models true abilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-14T17:51:23Z)
• MMIE: Massive Multimodal Interleaved Comprehension Benchmark for Large Vision-Language Models [71.36392373876505]
  We introduce MMIE, a large-scale benchmark for evaluating interleaved multimodal comprehension and generation in Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs)<n>MMIE comprises 20K meticulously curated multimodal queries, spanning 3 categories, 12 fields, and 102 subfields, including mathematics, coding, physics, literature, health, and arts.<n>It supports both interleaved inputs and outputs, offering a mix of multiple-choice and open-ended question formats to evaluate diverse competencies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-14T04:15:00Z)
• Mobile-Env: Building Qualified Evaluation Benchmarks for LLM-GUI Interaction [28.53259866617677]
  We introduce Mobile-Env, a comprehensive toolkit tailored for creating GUI benchmarks in the Android mobile environment. We collect an open-world task set across various real-world apps and a fixed world set, WikiHow, which captures a significant amount of dynamic online contents. Our findings reveal that even advanced models struggle with tasks that are relatively simple for humans.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-14T12:31:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.