What Limits Virtual Agent Application? OmniBench: A Scalable Multi-Dimensional Benchmark for Essential Virtual Agent Capabilities
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.08933v1
- Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 15:59:38 GMT
- Title: What Limits Virtual Agent Application? OmniBench: A Scalable Multi-Dimensional Benchmark for Essential Virtual Agent Capabilities
- Authors: Wendong Bu, Yang Wu, Qifan Yu, Minghe Gao, Bingchen Miao, Zhenkui Zhang, Kaihang Pan, Yunfei Li, Mengze Li, Wei Ji, Juncheng Li, Siliang Tang, Yueting Zhuang,
- Abstract summary: We introduce OmniBench, a cross-platform, graph-based benchmark with an automated pipeline for synthesizing tasks of controllable complexity.<n>We present OmniEval, a multidimensional evaluation framework that includes subtask-level evaluation, graph-based metrics, and comprehensive tests across 10 capabilities.<n>Our dataset contains 36k graph-structured tasks across 20 scenarios, achieving a 91% human acceptance rate.
- Score: 56.646832992178105
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: As multimodal large language models (MLLMs) advance, MLLM-based virtual agents have demonstrated remarkable performance. However, existing benchmarks face significant limitations, including uncontrollable task complexity, extensive manual annotation with limited scenarios, and a lack of multidimensional evaluation. In response to these challenges, we introduce OmniBench, a self-generating, cross-platform, graph-based benchmark with an automated pipeline for synthesizing tasks of controllable complexity through subtask composition. To evaluate the diverse capabilities of virtual agents on the graph, we further present OmniEval, a multidimensional evaluation framework that includes subtask-level evaluation, graph-based metrics, and comprehensive tests across 10 capabilities. Our synthesized dataset contains 36k graph-structured tasks across 20 scenarios, achieving a 91\% human acceptance rate. Training on our graph-structured data shows that it can more efficiently guide agents compared to manually annotated data. We conduct multidimensional evaluations for various open-source and closed-source models, revealing their performance across various capabilities and paving the way for future advancements. Our project is available at https://omni-bench.github.io/.
Related papers
- VisualTrans: A Benchmark for Real-World Visual Transformation Reasoning [10.497961559068493]
Visual transformation reasoning (VTR) is a vital cognitive capability that empowers intelligent agents to understand dynamic scenes.<n>Existing benchmarks suffer from a sim-to-real gap, limited task complexity, and incomplete reasoning coverage.<n>VisualTrans is the first comprehensive benchmark specifically designed for VTR in real-world human-object interaction scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-06T03:07:05Z) - Visual Document Understanding and Question Answering: A Multi-Agent Collaboration Framework with Test-Time Scaling [83.78874399606379]
We propose MACT, a Multi-Agent Collaboration framework with Test-Time scaling.<n>It comprises four distinct small-scale agents, with clearly defined roles and effective collaboration.<n>It shows superior performance with a smaller parameter scale without sacrificing the ability of general and mathematical tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-05T12:52:09Z) - DrafterBench: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Tasks Automation in Civil Engineering [7.264718073839472]
Large Language Model (LLM) agents have shown great potential for solving real-world problems and promise to be a solution for tasks automation in industry.<n>We propose DrafterBench for the comprehensive evaluation of LLM agents in the context of technical drawing revision.<n>DrafterBench is an open-source benchmark to rigorously test AI agents' proficiency in interpreting intricate and long-context instructions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-15T17:56:04Z) - ArtifactsBench: Bridging the Visual-Interactive Gap in LLM Code Generation Evaluation [48.24550684610705]
ArtifactsBench is a framework for automated visual code generation evaluation.<n>Our framework renders each generated artifact and captures its dynamic behavior through temporal screenshots.<n>We construct a new benchmark of 1,825 diverse tasks and evaluate over 30 leading Large Language Models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-07T12:53:00Z) - FormFactory: An Interactive Benchmarking Suite for Multimodal Form-Filling Agents [36.11725924594441]
Current online form filling tools are largely rule-based and lack generalizable, generative capabilities.<n>We propose FormFactory, an interactive benchmarking suite comprising a web-based interface, backend evaluation module, and dataset.<n>Our benchmark covers diverse real-world scenarios, incorporates various field formats, and simulates high-fidelity form interactions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-02T10:34:57Z) - Agent-X: Evaluating Deep Multimodal Reasoning in Vision-Centric Agentic Tasks [94.19506319646376]
We introduce Agent-X, a benchmark for evaluating vision-centric agents in real-world, multimodal settings.<n>Agent-X features 828 agentic tasks with authentic visual contexts, including images, multi-image comparisons, videos, and instructional text.<n>Our results reveal that even the best-performing models, including GPT, Gemini, and Qwen families, struggle to solve multi-step vision tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-30T17:59:53Z) - EmbodiedEval: Evaluate Multimodal LLMs as Embodied Agents [57.4686961979566]
EmbodiedEval is a comprehensive and interactive evaluation benchmark for MLLMs with embodied tasks.<n>It covers a broad spectrum of existing embodied AI tasks with significantly enhanced diversity.<n>We evaluated the state-of-the-art MLLMs on EmbodiedEval and found that they have a significant shortfall compared to human level on embodied tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-21T03:22:10Z) - MMAU: A Holistic Benchmark of Agent Capabilities Across Diverse Domains [54.117238759317004]
Massive Multitask Agent Understanding (MMAU) benchmark features comprehensive offline tasks that eliminate the need for complex environment setups.
It evaluates models across five domains, including Tool-use, Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) QA, Data Science and Machine Learning coding, Contest-level programming and Mathematics.
With a total of 20 meticulously designed tasks encompassing over 3K distinct prompts, MMAU provides a comprehensive framework for evaluating the strengths and limitations of LLM agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-18T00:58:41Z) - 3DBench: A Scalable 3D Benchmark and Instruction-Tuning Dataset [13.808860456901204]
We introduce a scalable 3D benchmark, accompanied by a large-scale instruction-tuning dataset known as 3DBench.
Specifically, we establish the benchmark that spans a wide range of spatial and semantic scales, from object-level to scene-level.
We present a rigorous pipeline for automatically constructing scalable 3D instruction-tuning datasets, covering 10 diverse multi-modal tasks with more than 0.23 million QA pairs generated in total.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-23T02:06:10Z) - VisualWebArena: Evaluating Multimodal Agents on Realistic Visual Web Tasks [93.85005277463802]
VisualWebArena is a benchmark designed to assess the performance of multimodal web agents on realistic tasks.
To perform on this benchmark, agents need to accurately process image-text inputs, interpret natural language instructions, and execute actions on websites to accomplish user-defined objectives.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-24T18:35:21Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.