Detecting and Mitigating Reward Hacking in Reinforcement Learning Systems: A Comprehensive Empirical Study

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.05619v1
• Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2025 03:00:02 GMT
• Title: Detecting and Mitigating Reward Hacking in Reinforcement Learning Systems: A Comprehensive Empirical Study
• Authors: Ibne Farabi Shihab, Sanjeda Akter, Anuj Sharma,
• Abstract summary: Reward hacking in Reinforcement Learning systems poses a critical threat to the deployment of autonomous agents.<n>This paper presents a large-scale empirical study of reward hacking across diverse RL environments and algorithms.
• Score: 2.1797343876622097
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Reward hacking in Reinforcement Learning (RL) systems poses a critical threat to the deployment of autonomous agents, where agents exploit flaws in reward functions to achieve high scores without fulfilling intended objectives. Despite growing awareness of this problem, systematic detection and mitigation approaches remain limited. This paper presents a large-scale empirical study of reward hacking across diverse RL environments and algorithms. We analyze 15,247 training episodes across 15 RL environments (Atari, MuJoCo, custom domains) and 5 algorithms (PPO, SAC, DQN, A3C, Rainbow), implementing automated detection algorithms for six categories of reward hacking: specification gaming, reward tampering, proxy optimization, objective misalignment, exploitation patterns, and wireheading. Our detection framework achieves 78.4% precision and 81.7% recall across environments, with computational overhead under 5%. Through controlled experiments varying reward function properties, we demonstrate that reward density and alignment with true objectives significantly impact hacking frequency ($p < 0.001$, Cohen's $d = 1.24$). We validate our approach through three simulated application studies representing recommendation systems, competitive gaming, and robotic control scenarios. Our mitigation techniques reduce hacking frequency by up to 54.6% in controlled scenarios, though we find these trade-offs are more challenging in practice due to concept drift, false positive costs, and adversarial adaptation. All detection algorithms, datasets, and experimental protocols are publicly available to support reproducible research in RL safety.

Related papers

• IR$^3$: Contrastive Inverse Reinforcement Learning for Interpretable Detection and Mitigation of Reward Hacking [67.20568716300272]
  Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) enables powerful LLM alignment but can introduce reward hacking.<n>We introduce IR3 (Interpretable Reward Reconstruction and Rectification), a framework that reverse-engineers, interprets, and surgically repairs the implicit objectives driving RLHF-tuned models.<n>We show that IR3 achieves 0.89 correlation with ground-truth rewards, identifies hacking features with over 90% precision, and significantly reduces hacking behaviors while maintaining capabilities within 3% of the original model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-23T01:14:53Z)
• Adversarial Reward Auditing for Active Detection and Mitigation of Reward Hacking [69.06218054848803]
  We propose Adrial Reward Auditing (ARA), a framework that reconceptualizes reward hacking as a dynamic, competitive game.<n>ARA operates in two stages: first, a Hacker policy discovers reward model vulnerabilities while an Auditor learns to detect exploitation from latent representations.<n>ARA achieves the best alignment-utility tradeoff among all baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-02T07:34:57Z)
• Benchmarking Reward Hack Detection in Code Environments via Contrastive Analysis [2.1541334033342103]
  We introduce TRACE (Testing Reward Anomalies in Code Environments), a synthetically curated and human-verified benchmark containing 517 testing trajectories.<n>Our experiments reveal that models capture reward hacks more effectively in contrastive settings than in isolated classification settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-27T22:45:43Z)
• Agentic Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Step Rewards [92.26560379363492]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly developed as autonomous agents using reinforcement learning (agentic RL)<n>We introduce implicit step rewards for agentic RL (iStar), a general credit-assignment strategy that integrates seamlessly with standard RL algorithms.<n>We evaluate our method on three challenging agent benchmarks, including WebShop and VisualSokoban, as well as open-ended social interactions with unverifiable rewards in SOTOPIA.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-23T16:15:42Z)
• Stabilizing Long-term Multi-turn Reinforcement Learning with Gated Rewards [13.70228195630989]
  We introduce the SWE-oriented RL Framework, a unified system supporting multi-turn interaction, docker-based execution, and customizable reward functions.<n>We also propose Gated Reward Accumulation (G-RA), a novel method that accumulates immediate rewards only when high-level (long-term) rewards meet a predefined threshold.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-14T11:37:02Z)
• MalCodeAI: Autonomous Vulnerability Detection and Remediation via Language Agnostic Code Reasoning [0.0]
  MalCodeAI is a language-agnostic pipeline for autonomous code security analysis and remediation.<n>It combines code decomposition and semantic reasoning using finetuned Qwen2.5-Coder-3B-Instruct models.<n>MalCodeAI supports red-hat-style exploit tracing, CVSS-based risk scoring, and zero-shot generalization to detect complex, zero-day vulnerabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-15T01:25:04Z)
• Stop Summation: Min-Form Credit Assignment Is All Process Reward Model Needs for Reasoning [25.817231106021552]
  Process reward models (PRMs) have proven effective for test-time scaling of Large Language Models (LLMs) on challenging reasoning tasks.<n>However, reward hacking issues with PRMs limit their successful application in reinforcement fine-tuning.<n>In this paper, we identify the main cause of PRM-induced reward hacking: the canonical summation-form credit assignment in reinforcement learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-21T17:59:02Z)
• InfoRM: Mitigating Reward Hacking in RLHF via Information-Theoretic Reward Modeling [66.3072381478251]
  Reward hacking, also termed reward overoptimization, remains a critical challenge. We propose a framework for reward modeling, namely InfoRM, by introducing a variational information bottleneck objective. We show that InfoRM's overoptimization detection mechanism is not only effective but also robust across a broad range of datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-14T17:49:07Z)
• REBEL: Reward Regularization-Based Approach for Robotic Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback [61.54791065013767]
  A misalignment between the reward function and human preferences can lead to catastrophic outcomes in the real world.<n>Recent methods aim to mitigate misalignment by learning reward functions from human preferences.<n>We propose a novel concept of reward regularization within the robotic RLHF framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-22T04:56:37Z)
• The Effects of Reward Misspecification: Mapping and Mitigating Misaligned Models [85.68751244243823]
  Reward hacking -- where RL agents exploit gaps in misspecified reward functions -- has been widely observed, but not yet systematically studied. We investigate reward hacking as a function of agent capabilities: model capacity, action space resolution, observation space noise, and training time. We find instances of phase transitions: capability thresholds at which the agent's behavior qualitatively shifts, leading to a sharp decrease in the true reward.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-10T18:58:52Z)
• MURAL: Meta-Learning Uncertainty-Aware Rewards for Outcome-Driven Reinforcement Learning [65.52675802289775]
  We show that an uncertainty aware classifier can solve challenging reinforcement learning problems. We propose a novel method for computing the normalized maximum likelihood (NML) distribution. We show that the resulting algorithm has a number of intriguing connections to both count-based exploration methods and prior algorithms for learning reward functions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-15T08:19:57Z)
• Disturbing Reinforcement Learning Agents with Corrupted Rewards [62.997667081978825]
  We analyze the effects of different attack strategies based on reward perturbations on reinforcement learning algorithms. We show that smoothly crafting adversarial rewards are able to mislead the learner, and that using low exploration probability values, the policy learned is more robust to corrupt rewards.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-12T15:53:48Z)
• Robust Deep Reinforcement Learning through Adversarial Loss [74.20501663956604]
  Recent studies have shown that deep reinforcement learning agents are vulnerable to small adversarial perturbations on the agent's inputs. We propose RADIAL-RL, a principled framework to train reinforcement learning agents with improved robustness against adversarial attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-05T07:49:42Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.