A Formal Refutation of the Blockchain Trilemma
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.05809v1
- Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2025 09:29:09 GMT
- Title: A Formal Refutation of the Blockchain Trilemma
- Authors: Craig Wright,
- Abstract summary: The so-called blockchain trilemma asserts the impossibility of simultaneously achieving scalability, security, and decentralisation within a single blockchain protocol.<n>We argue that the trilemma constitutes a category error, conflates distinct analytical domains, and relies upon unproven causal assumptions.<n>A constructive counterexample is presented: a blockchain protocol exhibiting unbounded transaction throughput, cryptographic security under adversarial load, and multipath decentralised propagation.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: The so-called blockchain trilemma asserts the impossibility of simultaneously achieving scalability, security, and decentralisation within a single blockchain protocol. In this paper, we formally refute that proposition. Employing predicate logic, formal automata theory, computational complexity analysis, and graph-theoretic measures of relay topology--specifically Baran's model of network path redundancy--we demonstrate that the trilemma constitutes a category error, conflates distinct analytical domains, and relies upon unproven causal assumptions. We further expose its reliance on composition fallacies drawn from flawed system implementations. A constructive counterexample is presented: a blockchain protocol exhibiting unbounded transaction throughput, cryptographic security under adversarial load, and multipath decentralised propagation. This example is not hypothetical but grounded in protocol design enabled by compact block relay, SPV verification, and IPv6 multicast. The trilemma is revealed not as a law of protocol architecture, but as a heuristic fallacy sustained by imprecision and design defeatism.
Related papers
- A Formal Rebuttal of "The Blockchain Trilemma: A Formal Proof of the Inherent Trade-Offs Among Decentralization, Security, and Scalability" [0.0]
We argue that the trilemma rests on semantic equivocation, misuse of distributed systems theory, and a failure to define operational metrics.<n>We reconstruct Bitcoin as a deterministic, stateless distribution protocol governed by evidentiary trust.<n>The paper concludes by identifying systemic issues in academic discourse and peer review that have allowed such fallacies to persist.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-10T15:42:39Z) - On Immutable Memory Systems for Artificial Agents: A Blockchain-Indexed Automata-Theoretic Framework Using ECDH-Keyed Merkle Chains [0.0]
We introduce the concept of the Merkle Automaton, a cryptographically anchored, deterministic computational framework.<n>Each agent transition, memory fragment, and reasoning step is committed within a Merkle structure rooted on-chain.<n>This architecture reframes memory not as a cache but as a ledger - one whose contents are enforced by protocol, bound by cryptography, and constrained by formal logic.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-16T08:43:56Z) - The Latency Price of Threshold Cryptosystem in Blockchains [52.359230560289745]
We study the interplay between threshold cryptography and a class of blockchains that use Byzantine-fault tolerant (BFT) consensus protocols.<n>Our measurements from the Aptos mainnet show that the optimistic approach reduces latency overhead by 71%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-16T20:53:04Z) - Pessimism of the Will, Optimism of the Intellect: Fair Protocols with Malicious but Rational Agents [0.6990493129893112]
We present a game-based framework for the study of fairness protocols.
It is based on the notion of strong secure equilibria, and leverages the conceptual and algorithmic toolbox of game theory.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-29T10:15:36Z) - Prototype-based Aleatoric Uncertainty Quantification for Cross-modal
Retrieval [139.21955930418815]
Cross-modal Retrieval methods build similarity relations between vision and language modalities by jointly learning a common representation space.
However, the predictions are often unreliable due to the Aleatoric uncertainty, which is induced by low-quality data, e.g., corrupt images, fast-paced videos, and non-detailed texts.
We propose a novel Prototype-based Aleatoric Uncertainty Quantification (PAU) framework to provide trustworthy predictions by quantifying the uncertainty arisen from the inherent data ambiguity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-29T09:41:19Z) - Entropy Accumulation under Post-Quantum Cryptographic Assumptions [4.416484585765028]
In device-independent (DI) quantum protocols, the security statements are oblivious to the characterization of the quantum apparatus.
We present a flexible framework for proving the security of such protocols by utilizing a combination of tools from quantum information theory.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-02T12:52:54Z) - Networked Communication for Decentralised Agents in Mean-Field Games [59.01527054553122]
We introduce networked communication to the mean-field game framework.<n>We prove that our architecture has sample guarantees bounded between those of the centralised- and independent-learning cases.<n>We show that our networked approach has significant advantages over both alternatives in terms of robustness to update failures and to changes in population size.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-05T10:45:39Z) - Quantum Proofs of Deletion for Learning with Errors [91.3755431537592]
We construct the first fully homomorphic encryption scheme with certified deletion.
Our main technical ingredient is an interactive protocol by which a quantum prover can convince a classical verifier that a sample from the Learning with Errors distribution in the form of a quantum state was deleted.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-03T10:07:32Z) - Logical blocks for fault-tolerant topological quantum computation [55.41644538483948]
We present a framework for universal fault-tolerant logic motivated by the need for platform-independent logical gate definitions.
We explore novel schemes for universal logic that improve resource overheads.
Motivated by the favorable logical error rates for boundaryless computation, we introduce a novel computational scheme.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-22T19:00:03Z) - Logical Credal Networks [87.25387518070411]
This paper introduces Logical Credal Networks, an expressive probabilistic logic that generalizes many prior models that combine logic and probability.
We investigate its performance on maximum a posteriori inference tasks, including solving Mastermind games with uncertainty and detecting credit card fraud.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-25T00:00:47Z) - Post-Quantum VRF and its Applications in Future-Proof Blockchain System [13.386254282693335]
A verifiable random function (VRF) is a powerful pseudo-random function that provides a non-interactively public verifiable proof for the correctness of its output.
We propose a generic compiler to obtain the post-quantum VRF from the simple VRF solution using symmetric-key primitives.
We show potential applications of a quantum-secure VRF, such as quantum-secure decentralized random beacon and lottery-based proof of stake consensus blockchain protocol.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-05T07:10:41Z) - Quantum Multi-Solution Bernoulli Search with Applications to Bitcoin's
Post-Quantum Security [67.06003361150228]
A proof of work (PoW) is an important cryptographic construct enabling a party to convince others that they invested some effort in solving a computational task.
In this work, we examine the hardness of finding such chain of PoWs against quantum strategies.
We prove that the chain of PoWs problem reduces to a problem we call multi-solution Bernoulli search, for which we establish its quantum query complexity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-30T18:03:56Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.