Too Human to Model:The Uncanny Valley of LLMs in Social Simulation -- When Generative Language Agents Misalign with Modelling Principles

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.06310v1
• Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2025 18:02:36 GMT
• Title: Too Human to Model:The Uncanny Valley of LLMs in Social Simulation -- When Generative Language Agents Misalign with Modelling Principles
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) have been increasingly used to build agents in social simulation.<n>We argue that LLM agents are too expressive, detailed and intractable to be consistent with the abstraction, simplification, and interpretability typically demanded by modelling.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have been increasingly used to build agents in social simulation because of their impressive abilities to generate fluent, contextually coherent dialogues. Such abilities can enhance the realism of models. However, the pursuit of realism is not necessarily compatible with the epistemic foundation of modelling. We argue that LLM agents, in many regards, are too human to model: they are too expressive, detailed and intractable to be consistent with the abstraction, simplification, and interpretability typically demanded by modelling. Through a model-building thought experiment that converts the Bass diffusion model to an LLM-based variant, we uncover five core dilemmas: a temporal resolution mismatch between natural conversation and abstract time steps; the need for intervention in conversations while avoiding undermining spontaneous agent outputs; the temptation to introduce rule-like instructions in prompts while maintaining conversational naturalness; the tension between role consistency and role evolution across time; and the challenge of understanding emergence, where system-level patterns become obscured by verbose micro textual outputs. These dilemmas steer the LLM agents towards an uncanny valley: not abstract enough to clarify underlying social mechanisms, while not natural enough to represent realistic human behaviour. This exposes an important paradox: the realism of LLM agents can obscure, rather than clarify, social dynamics when misapplied. We tease out the conditions in which LLM agents are ideally suited: where system-level emergence is not the focus, linguistic nuances and meaning are central, interactions unfold in natural time, and stable role identity is more important than long-term behavioural evolution. We call for repositioning LLM agents in the ecosystem of social simulation for future applications.

Related papers

• Conversable Complexity: Agentic LLM Collectives as Interpretable Substrates [5.497634485931493]
  We argue that collectives of agents can serve as a computational substrate for Artificial Life research.<n>We outline the notion of interpretability in language-model research and extend it for collectives of agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-01T15:08:02Z)
• LLM-enabled Social Agents [2.379144469644809]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have transformed agent-agent and human-agent interaction.<n>This paper argues that they should be grounded in role definitions operationalized through persona descriptions.<n>The paper concludes that persona-based role definitions are a necessary foundation for turning language competence into social behaviour.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-04T08:39:58Z)
• LLMs Reading the Rhythms of Daily Life: Aligned Understanding for Behavior Prediction and Generation [53.62804271492357]
  Large language models (LLMs) offer a promising direction due to their semantic richness, strong interpretability, and generative capabilities.<n>We propose Behavior Understanding Alignment (BUA), a novel framework that integrates LLMs into human behavior modeling through a structured curriculum learning process.<n>BUA employs sequence embeddings from pretrained behavior models as alignment anchors and guides the LLM through a three-stage curriculum, while a multi-round dialogue setting introduces prediction and generation capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-26T07:34:37Z)
• Position: AI Agents Are Not (Yet) a Panacea for Social Simulation [62.891898598784415]
  Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have spurred growing interest in using LLM-integrated agents for social simulation.<n>This position paper argues that LLM-based agents are not (yet) a panacea for social simulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-19T06:35:07Z)
• TwinVoice: A Multi-dimensional Benchmark Towards Digital Twins via LLM Persona Simulation [55.55404595177229]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are exhibiting emergent human-like abilities.<n>TwinVoice is a benchmark for assessing persona simulation across diverse real-world contexts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-29T14:00:42Z)
• DEBATE: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Role-Playing LLM Agents in Multi-Agent, Long-Form Debates [10.609797175227644]
  We introduce DEBATE, the first large-scale empirical benchmark to evaluate the authenticity of the interaction between multi-agent role-playing LLMs.<n>We systematically evaluate and identify critical discrepancies between simulated and authentic group dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-29T02:21:10Z)
• From Narrative to Action: A Hierarchical LLM-Agent Framework for Human Mobility Generation [3.242664635630543]
  Large language models (LLMs) show potential, but struggle to balance creative reasoning with strict structural compliance.<n>This study proposes a Hierarchical LLM-Agent Framework that integrates high-level narrative reasoning, mid-level reflective planning.<n>This research advances synthetic mobility generation from a data-driven paradigm to a spatial-driven simulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-28T00:26:36Z)
• Social Simulations with Large Language Model Risk Utopian Illusion [61.358959720048354]
  We introduce a systematic framework for analyzing large language models' behavior in social simulation.<n>Our approach simulates multi-agent interactions through chatroom-style conversations and analyzes them across five linguistic dimensions.<n>Our findings reveal that LLMs do not faithfully reproduce genuine human behavior but instead reflect overly idealized versions of it.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-24T06:08:41Z)
• IROTE: Human-like Traits Elicitation of Large Language Model via In-Context Self-Reflective Optimization [66.6349183886101]
  We propose IROTE, a novel in-context method for stable and transferable trait elicitation.<n>We show that one single IROTE-generated self-reflection can induce LLMs' stable impersonation of the target trait across diverse downstream tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-12T08:04:28Z)
• SimuRA: Towards General Goal-Oriented Agent via Simulative Reasoning Architecture with LLM-Based World Model [88.04128601981145]
  We introduce SimuRA, a goal-oriented architecture for generalized agentic reasoning.<n>modelname overcomes the limitations of autoregressive reasoning by introducing a world model for planning via simulation.<n>World-model-based planning, in particular, shows consistent advantage of up to 124% over autoregressive planning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-31T17:57:20Z)
• Integrating LLM in Agent-Based Social Simulation: Opportunities and Challenges [0.7739037410679168]
  The paper reviews recent findings on the ability of Large Language Models to replicate key aspects of human cognition.<n>The second part surveys emerging applications of LLMs in multi-agent simulation frameworks.<n>The paper concludes by advocating for hybrid approaches that integrate LLMs into traditional agent-based modeling platforms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-25T15:15:35Z)
• LLM-Based Social Simulations Require a Boundary [3.351170542925928]
  This position paper argues that large language model (LLM)-based social simulations should establish clear boundaries.<n>We examine three key boundary problems: alignment (simulated behaviors matching real-world patterns), consistency (maintaining coherent agent behavior over time), and robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-24T17:14:47Z)
• Modeling Earth-Scale Human-Like Societies with One Billion Agents [54.465233996410156]
  Light Society is an agent-based simulation framework.<n>It formalizes social processes as structured transitions of agent and environment states.<n>It supports efficient simulation of societies with over one billion agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-07T09:14:12Z)
• If an LLM Were a Character, Would It Know Its Own Story? Evaluating Lifelong Learning in LLMs [55.8331366739144]
  We introduce LIFESTATE-BENCH, a benchmark designed to assess lifelong learning in large language models (LLMs)<n>Our fact checking evaluation probes models' self-awareness, episodic memory retrieval, and relationship tracking, across both parametric and non-parametric approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-30T16:50:57Z)
• Failure Modes of LLMs for Causal Reasoning on Narratives [51.19592551510628]
  We investigate the interaction between world knowledge and logical reasoning.<n>We find that state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) often rely on superficial generalizations.<n>We show that simple reformulations of the task can elicit more robust reasoning behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-31T12:48:58Z)
• Language Agents Meet Causality -- Bridging LLMs and Causal World Models [50.79984529172807]
  We propose a framework that integrates causal representation learning with large language models. This framework learns a causal world model, with causal variables linked to natural language expressions. We evaluate the framework on causal inference and planning tasks across temporal scales and environmental complexities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-25T18:36:37Z)
• PersLLM: A Personified Training Approach for Large Language Models [66.16513246245401]
  We propose PersLLM, a framework for better data construction and model tuning.<n>For insufficient data usage, we incorporate strategies such as Chain-of-Thought prompting and anti-induction.<n>For rigid behavior patterns, we design the tuning process and introduce automated DPO to enhance the specificity and dynamism of the models' personalities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-17T08:13:22Z)
• Transforming Agency. On the mode of existence of Large Language Models [0.0]
  This paper investigates the ontological characterization of Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT. We argue that ChatGPT should be characterized as an interlocutor or linguistic automaton, a library-that-talks, devoid of (autonomous) agency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-15T14:01:35Z)
• LLM-driven Imitation of Subrational Behavior : Illusion or Reality? [3.2365468114603937]
  Existing work highlights the ability of Large Language Models to address complex reasoning tasks and mimic human communication. We propose to investigate the use of LLMs to generate synthetic human demonstrations, which are then used to learn subrational agent policies. We experimentally evaluate the ability of our framework to model sub-rationality through four simple scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-13T19:46:39Z)
• Systematic Biases in LLM Simulations of Debates [12.933509143906141]
  We study the limitations of Large Language Models in simulating human interactions.<n>Our findings indicate a tendency for LLM agents to conform to the model's inherent social biases.<n>These results underscore the need for further research to develop methods that help agents overcome these biases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-06T14:51:55Z)
• Can Large Language Models Learn Independent Causal Mechanisms? [9.274428418715347]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) fall short on the same tasks in uncommon settings or with distribution shifts. We show that causal models, that learn abstract variables and causal relationships, can demonstrate increased robustness against changes in the distribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-04T23:04:02Z)
• Large Language Models are In-Context Semantic Reasoners rather than Symbolic Reasoners [75.85554779782048]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have excited the natural language and machine learning community over recent years. Despite of numerous successful applications, the underlying mechanism of such in-context capabilities still remains unclear. In this work, we hypothesize that the learned textitsemantics of language tokens do the most heavy lifting during the reasoning process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T07:33:34Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.