Adaptive collaboration for online personalized distributed learning with heterogeneous clients
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.06844v1
- Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2025 13:44:27 GMT
- Title: Adaptive collaboration for online personalized distributed learning with heterogeneous clients
- Authors: Constantin Philippenko, Batiste Le Bars, Kevin Scaman, Laurent Massoulié,
- Abstract summary: We study the problem of online personalized learning with $N$ statistically heterogeneous clients collaborating to accelerate local training.<n>An important challenge in this setting is to select relevant collaborators to reduce variance while mitigating the introduced bias.
- Score: 22.507916490976044
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: We study the problem of online personalized decentralized learning with $N$ statistically heterogeneous clients collaborating to accelerate local training. An important challenge in this setting is to select relevant collaborators to reduce gradient variance while mitigating the introduced bias. To tackle this, we introduce a gradient-based collaboration criterion, allowing each client to dynamically select peers with similar gradients during the optimization process. Our criterion is motivated by a refined and more general theoretical analysis of the All-for-one algorithm, proved to be optimal in Even et al. (2022) for an oracle collaboration scheme. We derive excess loss upper-bounds for smooth objective functions, being either strongly convex, non-convex, or satisfying the Polyak-Lojasiewicz condition; our analysis reveals that the algorithm acts as a variance reduction method where the speed-up depends on a sufficient variance. We put forward two collaboration methods instantiating the proposed general schema; and we show that one variant preserves the optimality of All-for-one. We validate our results with experiments on synthetic and real datasets.
Related papers
- Sociodynamics-inspired Adaptive Coalition and Client Selection in Federated Learning [39.58317527488534]
We introduce shortname (Federated Coalition Variance Reduction with Boltzmann Exploration), a variance-reducing algorithm inspired by opinion dynamics over temporal social networks.<n>Our experiments show that in heterogeneous scenarios our algorithm outperforms existing FL algorithms, yielding more accurate results and faster convergence.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-03T14:04:31Z) - Preference Optimization for Combinatorial Optimization Problems [54.87466279363487]
Reinforcement Learning (RL) has emerged as a powerful tool for neural optimization, enabling models learns that solve complex problems without requiring expert knowledge.<n>Despite significant progress, existing RL approaches face challenges such as diminishing reward signals and inefficient exploration in vast action spaces.<n>We propose Preference Optimization, a novel method that transforms quantitative reward signals into qualitative preference signals via statistical comparison modeling.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-13T16:47:00Z) - Client-Centric Federated Adaptive Optimization [78.30827455292827]
Federated Learning (FL) is a distributed learning paradigm where clients collaboratively train a model while keeping their own data private.<n>We propose Federated-Centric Adaptive Optimization, which is a class of novel federated optimization approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-17T04:00:50Z) - Aiding Global Convergence in Federated Learning via Local Perturbation and Mutual Similarity Information [6.767885381740953]
Federated learning has emerged as a distributed optimization paradigm.
We propose a novel modified framework wherein each client locally performs a perturbed gradient step.
We show that our algorithm speeds convergence up to a margin of 30 global rounds compared with FedAvg.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-07T23:14:05Z) - Provably Personalized and Robust Federated Learning [47.50663360022456]
We propose simple algorithms which identify clusters of similar clients and train a personalized modelper-cluster.
The convergence rates of our algorithmsally match those obtained if we knew the true underlying clustering of the clients and are provably robust in the Byzantine setting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-14T09:37:39Z) - On the Convergence of Distributed Stochastic Bilevel Optimization
Algorithms over a Network [55.56019538079826]
Bilevel optimization has been applied to a wide variety of machine learning models.
Most existing algorithms restrict their single-machine setting so that they are incapable of handling distributed data.
We develop novel decentralized bilevel optimization algorithms based on a gradient tracking communication mechanism and two different gradients.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-30T05:29:52Z) - Straggler-Resilient Personalized Federated Learning [55.54344312542944]
Federated learning allows training models from samples distributed across a large network of clients while respecting privacy and communication restrictions.
We develop a novel algorithmic procedure with theoretical speedup guarantees that simultaneously handles two of these hurdles.
Our method relies on ideas from representation learning theory to find a global common representation using all clients' data and learn a user-specific set of parameters leading to a personalized solution for each client.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-05T01:14:46Z) - DRFLM: Distributionally Robust Federated Learning with Inter-client
Noise via Local Mixup [58.894901088797376]
federated learning has emerged as a promising approach for training a global model using data from multiple organizations without leaking their raw data.
We propose a general framework to solve the above two challenges simultaneously.
We provide comprehensive theoretical analysis including robustness analysis, convergence analysis, and generalization ability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-16T08:08:29Z) - Fair and Consistent Federated Learning [48.19977689926562]
Federated learning (FL) has gain growing interests for its capability of learning from distributed data sources collectively.
We propose an FL framework to jointly consider performance consistency and algorithmic fairness across different local clients.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-08-19T01:56:08Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.