A New Approach for Multicriteria Assessment in the Ranking of Alternatives Using Cardinal and Ordinal Data

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.08875v1
• Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 04:00:48 GMT
• Title: A New Approach for Multicriteria Assessment in the Ranking of Alternatives Using Cardinal and Ordinal Data
• Authors: Fuh-Hwa Franklin Liu, Su-Chuan Shih,
• Abstract summary: We propose a novel MCA approach that combines two Virtual Gap Analysis (VGA) models.<n>The VGA framework, rooted in linear programming, is pivotal in the MCA methodology.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Modern methods for multi-criteria assessment (MCA), such as Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA), and Multiple Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM), are utilized to appraise a collection of Decision-Making Units (DMUs), also known as alternatives, based on several criteria. These methodologies inherently rely on assumptions and can be influenced by subjective judgment to effectively tackle the complex evaluation challenges in various fields. In real-world scenarios, it is essential to incorporate both quantitative and qualitative criteria as they consist of cardinal and ordinal data. Despite the inherent variability in the criterion values of different alternatives, the homogeneity assumption is often employed, significantly affecting evaluations. To tackle these challenges and determine the most appropriate alternative, we propose a novel MCA approach that combines two Virtual Gap Analysis (VGA) models. The VGA framework, rooted in linear programming, is pivotal in the MCA methodology. This approach improves efficiency and fairness, ensuring that evaluations are both comprehensive and dependable, thus offering a strong and adaptive solution. Two comprehensive numerical examples demonstrate the accuracy and transparency of our proposed method. The goal is to encourage continued advancement and stimulate progress in automated decision systems and decision support systems.

Related papers

• Algorithmic Detection of Rank Reversals, Transitivity Violations, and Decomposition Inconsistencies in Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis [0.0]
  We present three tests that detect the presence of Rank Reversals, along with their implementation in the Scikit-Criteria library.<n>We also address the complications that arise when implementing these tests for general scenarios and the design considerations we made to handle them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-31T19:31:41Z)
• EVA-MILP: Towards Standardized Evaluation of MILP Instance Generation [13.49043811341421]
  Mixed-Integer Linear Programming (MILP) is fundamental to solving complex decision-making problems.<n>The proliferation of MILP instance generation methods, driven by machine learning's demand for diverse datasets, has significantly outpaced standardized evaluation techniques.<n>This paper introduces a comprehensive benchmark framework designed for the systematic and objective evaluation of MILP instance generation methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-30T16:42:15Z)
• SEOE: A Scalable and Reliable Semantic Evaluation Framework for Open Domain Event Detection [70.23196257213829]
  We propose a scalable and reliable Semantic-level Evaluation framework for Open domain Event detection.<n>Our proposed framework first constructs a scalable evaluation benchmark that currently includes 564 event types covering 7 major domains.<n>We then leverage large language models (LLMs) as automatic evaluation agents to compute a semantic F1-score, incorporating fine-grained definitions of semantically similar labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-05T09:37:05Z)
• SKADA-Bench: Benchmarking Unsupervised Domain Adaptation Methods with Realistic Validation On Diverse Modalities [55.87169702896249]
  Unsupervised Domain Adaptation (DA) consists of adapting a model trained on a labeled source domain to perform well on an unlabeled target domain with some data distribution shift.<n>We present a complete and fair evaluation of existing shallow algorithms, including reweighting, mapping, and subspace alignment.<n>Our benchmark highlights the importance of realistic validation and provides practical guidance for real-life applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T12:52:29Z)
• An Efficient Approach for Solving Expensive Constrained Multiobjective Optimization Problems [0.0]
  An efficient probabilistic selection based constrained multi-objective EA is proposed, referred to as PSCMOEA. It comprises novel elements such as (a) an adaptive search bound identification scheme based on the feasibility and convergence status of evaluated solutions. Numerical experiments are conducted on an extensive range of challenging constrained problems using low evaluation budgets to simulate ECMOPs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-22T02:32:58Z)
• Optimal Baseline Corrections for Off-Policy Contextual Bandits [61.740094604552475]
  We aim to learn decision policies that optimize an unbiased offline estimate of an online reward metric. We propose a single framework built on their equivalence in learning scenarios. Our framework enables us to characterize the variance-optimal unbiased estimator and provide a closed-form solution for it.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-09T12:52:22Z)
• Better Understanding Differences in Attribution Methods via Systematic Evaluations [57.35035463793008]
  Post-hoc attribution methods have been proposed to identify image regions most influential to the models' decisions. We propose three novel evaluation schemes to more reliably measure the faithfulness of those methods. We use these evaluation schemes to study strengths and shortcomings of some widely used attribution methods over a wide range of models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-21T14:24:58Z)
• In Search of Insights, Not Magic Bullets: Towards Demystification of the Model Selection Dilemma in Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Estimation [92.51773744318119]
  This paper empirically investigates the strengths and weaknesses of different model selection criteria. We highlight that there is a complex interplay between selection strategies, candidate estimators and the data used for comparing them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-06T16:55:37Z)
• Reinforcement Learning with Heterogeneous Data: Estimation and Inference [84.72174994749305]
  We introduce the K-Heterogeneous Markov Decision Process (K-Hetero MDP) to address sequential decision problems with population heterogeneity. We propose the Auto-Clustered Policy Evaluation (ACPE) for estimating the value of a given policy, and the Auto-Clustered Policy Iteration (ACPI) for estimating the optimal policy in a given policy class. We present simulations to support our theoretical findings, and we conduct an empirical study on the standard MIMIC-III dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-31T20:58:47Z)
• Multicriteria Group Decision-Making Under Uncertainty Using Interval Data and Cloud Models [0.0]
  We propose a multicriteria group decision making (MCGDM) algorithm under uncertainty where data is collected as intervals. The proposed MCGDM algorithm aggregates the data, determines the optimal weights for criteria and ranks alternatives with no further input. The proposed MCGDM algorithm is implemented on a case study of a cybersecurity problem to illustrate its feasibility and effectiveness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-01T06:34:48Z)
• Application of independent component analysis and TOPSIS to deal with dependent criteria in multicriteria decision problems [8.637110868126546]
  We propose a novel approach whose aim is to estimate, from the observed data, a set of independent latent criteria. A central element of our approach is to formulate the decision problem as a blind source separation problem. We consider TOPSIS-based approaches to obtain the ranking of alternatives from the latent criteria.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-06T13:51:28Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.