Application of independent component analysis and TOPSIS to deal with dependent criteria in multicriteria decision problems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2002.02257v1
• Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2020 13:51:28 GMT
• Title: Application of independent component analysis and TOPSIS to deal with dependent criteria in multicriteria decision problems
• Authors: Guilherme Dean Pelegrina, Leonardo Tomazeli Duarte, Jo\~ao Marcos Travassos Romano
• Abstract summary: We propose a novel approach whose aim is to estimate, from the observed data, a set of independent latent criteria. A central element of our approach is to formulate the decision problem as a blind source separation problem. We consider TOPSIS-based approaches to obtain the ranking of alternatives from the latent criteria.
• Score: 8.637110868126546
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: A vast number of multicriteria decision making methods have been developed to deal with the problem of ranking a set of alternatives evaluated in a multicriteria fashion. Very often, these methods assume that the evaluation among criteria is statistically independent. However, in actual problems, the observed data may comprise dependent criteria, which, among other problems, may result in biased rankings. In order to deal with this issue, we propose a novel approach whose aim is to estimate, from the observed data, a set of independent latent criteria, which can be seen as an alternative representation of the original decision matrix. A central element of our approach is to formulate the decision problem as a blind source separation problem, which allows us to apply independent component analysis techniques to estimate the latent criteria. Moreover, we consider TOPSIS-based approaches to obtain the ranking of alternatives from the latent criteria. Results in both synthetic and actual data attest the relevance of the proposed approach.

Related papers

• LLM-enhanced Reranking in Recommender Systems [49.969932092129305]
  Reranking is a critical component in recommender systems, playing an essential role in refining the output of recommendation algorithms. We introduce a comprehensive reranking framework, designed to seamlessly integrate various reranking criteria. A customizable input mechanism is also integrated, enabling the tuning of the language model's focus to meet specific reranking needs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-18T09:29:18Z)
• Learning Fair Policies for Multi-stage Selection Problems from Observational Data [4.282745020665833]
  We consider the problem of learning fair policies for multi-stage selection problems from observational data. This problem arises in several high-stakes domains such as company hiring, loan approval, or bail decisions where outcomes are only observed for those selected. We propose a multi-stage framework that can be augmented with various fairness constraints, such as demographic parity or equal opportunity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-20T16:33:15Z)
• Likelihood Ratio Confidence Sets for Sequential Decision Making [51.66638486226482]
  We revisit the likelihood-based inference principle and propose to use likelihood ratios to construct valid confidence sequences. Our method is especially suitable for problems with well-specified likelihoods. We show how to provably choose the best sequence of estimators and shed light on connections to online convex optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-08T00:10:21Z)
• In Search of Insights, Not Magic Bullets: Towards Demystification of the Model Selection Dilemma in Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Estimation [92.51773744318119]
  This paper empirically investigates the strengths and weaknesses of different model selection criteria. We highlight that there is a complex interplay between selection strategies, candidate estimators and the data used for comparing them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-06T16:55:37Z)
• Unified Bayesian Frameworks for Multi-criteria Decision-making Problems [2.1833781995073416]
  This paper introduces Bayesian frameworks for tackling various aspects of multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problems. The proposed frameworks offer statistically elegant solutions to key challenges in MCDM, such as group decision-making problems and criteria correlation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-29T06:47:05Z)
• Off-Policy Evaluation with Policy-Dependent Optimization Response [90.28758112893054]
  We develop a new framework for off-policy evaluation with a textitpolicy-dependent linear optimization response. We construct unbiased estimators for the policy-dependent estimand by a perturbation method. We provide a general algorithm for optimizing causal interventions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-25T20:25:37Z)
• Reinforcement Learning with Heterogeneous Data: Estimation and Inference [84.72174994749305]
  We introduce the K-Heterogeneous Markov Decision Process (K-Hetero MDP) to address sequential decision problems with population heterogeneity. We propose the Auto-Clustered Policy Evaluation (ACPE) for estimating the value of a given policy, and the Auto-Clustered Policy Iteration (ACPI) for estimating the optimal policy in a given policy class. We present simulations to support our theoretical findings, and we conduct an empirical study on the standard MIMIC-III dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-31T20:58:47Z)
• Parameter selection in Gaussian process interpolation: an empirical study of selection criteria [0.0]
  This article revisits the fundamental problem of parameter selection for Gaussian process. We show that the choice of an appropriate family of models is often more important than the choice of a particular selection criterion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-13T11:57:56Z)
• Offline Policy Selection under Uncertainty [113.57441913299868]
  We consider offline policy selection as learning preferences over a set of policy prospects given a fixed experience dataset. Access to the full distribution over one's belief of the policy value enables more flexible selection algorithms under a wider range of downstream evaluation metrics. We show how BayesDICE may be used to rank policies with respect to any arbitrary downstream policy selection metric.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-12T23:09:21Z)
• Multicriteria Group Decision-Making Under Uncertainty Using Interval Data and Cloud Models [0.0]
  We propose a multicriteria group decision making (MCGDM) algorithm under uncertainty where data is collected as intervals. The proposed MCGDM algorithm aggregates the data, determines the optimal weights for criteria and ranks alternatives with no further input. The proposed MCGDM algorithm is implemented on a case study of a cybersecurity problem to illustrate its feasibility and effectiveness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-01T06:34:48Z)
• A study of the Multicriteria decision analysis based on the time-series features and a TOPSIS method proposal for a tensorial approach [1.3750624267664155]
  We propose a new approach to rank the alternatives based on the criteria time-series features (tendency, variance, etc.) In this novel approach, the data is structured in three dimensions, which require a more complex data structure, as the textittensors. Computational results reveal that it is possible to rank the alternatives from a new perspective by considering meaningful decision-making information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-21T14:37:02Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.