LRMR: LLM-Driven Relational Multi-node Ranking for Lymph Node Metastasis Assessment in Rectal Cancer

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.11457v1
• Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 16:29:45 GMT
• Title: LRMR: LLM-Driven Relational Multi-node Ranking for Lymph Node Metastasis Assessment in Rectal Cancer
• Authors: Yaoxian Dong, Yifan Gao, Haoyue Li, Yanfen Cui, Xin Gao,
• Abstract summary: preoperative assessment of lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer guides treatment decisions.<n>Some artificial intelligence models operate as black boxes, lacking the interpretability needed for clinical trust.<n>We introduce LRMR, an LLM-Driven Multi-node Ranking framework.
• Score: 12.795639054336226
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Accurate preoperative assessment of lymph node (LN) metastasis in rectal cancer guides treatment decisions, yet conventional MRI evaluation based on morphological criteria shows limited diagnostic performance. While some artificial intelligence models have been developed, they often operate as black boxes, lacking the interpretability needed for clinical trust. Moreover, these models typically evaluate nodes in isolation, overlooking the patient-level context. To address these limitations, we introduce LRMR, an LLM-Driven Relational Multi-node Ranking framework. This approach reframes the diagnostic task from a direct classification problem into a structured reasoning and ranking process. The LRMR framework operates in two stages. First, a multimodal large language model (LLM) analyzes a composite montage image of all LNs from a patient, generating a structured report that details ten distinct radiological features. Second, a text-based LLM performs pairwise comparisons of these reports between different patients, establishing a relative risk ranking based on the severity and number of adverse features. We evaluated our method on a retrospective cohort of 117 rectal cancer patients. LRMR achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.7917 and an F1-score of 0.7200, outperforming a range of deep learning baselines, including ResNet50 (AUC 0.7708). Ablation studies confirmed the value of our two main contributions: removing the relational ranking stage or the structured prompting stage led to a significant performance drop, with AUCs falling to 0.6875 and 0.6458, respectively. Our work demonstrates that decoupling visual perception from cognitive reasoning through a two-stage LLM framework offers a powerful, interpretable, and effective new paradigm for assessing lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer.

Related papers

• Suppressing Prior-Comparison Hallucinations in Radiology Report Generation via Semantically Decoupled Latent Steering [94.37535002230504]
  We develop a training-free, inference-time control framework termed Semantically Decoupled Latent Steering.<n>Our approach constructs a semantic-free intervention vector via large language model (LLM)-driven semantic decomposition.<n>We show that our approach significantly reduces the probability of historical hallucinations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-27T04:49:01Z)
• A Federated and Parameter-Efficient Framework for Large Language Model Training in Medicine [59.78991974851707]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong performance on medical benchmarks, including question answering and diagnosis.<n>Most medical LLMs are trained on data from a single institution, which faces limitations in generalizability and safety in heterogeneous systems.<n>We introduce the model-agnostic and parameter-efficient federated learning framework for adapting LLMs to medical applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-29T18:48:21Z)
• Aligning Findings with Diagnosis: A Self-Consistent Reinforcement Learning Framework for Trustworthy Radiology Reporting [37.57009831483529]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have shown strong potential for radiology report generation.<n>Our framework restructures generation into two distinct components: a think block for detailed findings and an answer block for structured disease labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-06T14:17:44Z)
• Automated Identification of Incidentalomas Requiring Follow-Up: A Multi-Anatomy Evaluation of LLM-Based and Supervised Approaches [5.958100741754613]
  We evaluated large language models (LLMs) against supervised baselines for fine-grained, lesion-level detection of incidentalomas.<n>We introduced a novel inference strategy using lesion-tagged inputs and anatomy-aware prompting to ground model reasoning.<n>The anatomy-informed GPT-OSS-20b model achieved the highest performance, yielding an incidentaloma-positive macro-F1 of 0.79.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-05T08:49:57Z)
• Teaching AI Stepwise Diagnostic Reasoning with Report-Guided Chain-of-Thought Learning [11.537036709742345]
  DiagCoT is a framework that applies supervised fine-tuning to general-purpose vision-language models (VLMs)<n>DiagCoT combines contrastive image-report tuning for domain alignment, chain-of-thought supervision to capture inferential logic, and reinforcement tuning with clinical reward signals to enhance factual accuracy and fluency.<n>It outperformed state-of-the-art models including LLaVA-Med and CXR-LLAVA on long-tailed diseases and external datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-08T08:01:26Z)
• LGE-Guided Cross-Modality Contrastive Learning for Gadolinium-Free Cardiomyopathy Screening in Cine CMR [51.11296719862485]
  We propose a Contrastive Learning and Cross-Modal alignment framework for gadolinium-free cardiomyopathy screening using cine CMR sequences.<n>By aligning the latent spaces of cine CMR and Late Gadolinium Enhancement (LGE) sequences, our model encodes fibrosis-specific pathology into cine CMR embeddings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-23T07:21:23Z)
• EAGLE: Efficient Alignment of Generalized Latent Embeddings for Multimodal Survival Prediction with Interpretable Attribution Analysis [16.567468717846676]
  Existing multimodal approaches suffer from simplistic fusion strategies, massive computational requirements, and lack of interpretability-critical barriers to clinical adoption.<n>We present Eagle, a novel deep learning framework that addresses these limitations through attention-based multimodal fusion with comprehensive attribution analysis.<n>Eagle bridges the gap between advanced AI capabilities and practical healthcare deployment, offering a scalable solution for multimodal survival prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-12T03:56:13Z)
• Look & Mark: Leveraging Radiologist Eye Fixations and Bounding boxes in Multimodal Large Language Models for Chest X-ray Report Generation [2.821158017021184]
  Look & Mark (L&M) is a novel grounding fixation strategy that integrates radiologist eye fixations (Look) and bounding box annotations (Mark)<n>General-purpose models also benefit from L&M combined with in-context learning, with LLaVA-OV achieving an 87.3% clinical average performance (C.AVG)-the highest among all models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-28T10:54:40Z)
• ChestX-Reasoner: Advancing Radiology Foundation Models with Reasoning through Step-by-Step Verification [57.22053411719822]
  ChestX-Reasoner is a radiology diagnosis MLLM designed to leverage process supervision mined directly from clinical reports.<n>Our two-stage training framework combines supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning guided by process rewards to better align model reasoning with clinical standards.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-29T16:48:23Z)
• GEMA-Score: Granular Explainable Multi-Agent Scoring Framework for Radiology Report Evaluation [7.838068874909676]
  Granular Explainable Multi-Agent Score (GEMA-Score) conducts both objective and subjective evaluation through a large language model-based multi-agent workflow.<n>GEMA-Score achieves the highest correlation with human expert evaluations on a public dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-07T11:42:22Z)
• Quantifying the Reasoning Abilities of LLMs on Real-world Clinical Cases [48.87360916431396]
  We introduce MedR-Bench, a benchmarking dataset of 1,453 structured patient cases, annotated with reasoning references.<n>We propose a framework encompassing three critical examination recommendation, diagnostic decision-making, and treatment planning, simulating the entire patient care journey.<n>Using this benchmark, we evaluate five state-of-the-art reasoning LLMs, including DeepSeek-R1, OpenAI-o3-mini, and Gemini-2.0-Flash Thinking, etc.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-06T18:35:39Z)
• Explainable AI for Mental Health Emergency Returns: Integrating LLMs with Predictive Modeling [2.466324275447403]
  Emergency department (ED) returns for mental health conditions pose a major healthcare burden, with 24-27% of patients returning within 30 days.<n>To assess whether integrating large language models (LLMs) with machine learning improves predictive accuracy and clinical interpretability of ED mental health return risk models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-21T15:41:20Z)
• LlaMADRS: Prompting Large Language Models for Interview-Based Depression Assessment [75.44934940580112]
  This study introduces LlaMADRS, a novel framework leveraging open-source Large Language Models (LLMs) to automate depression severity assessment.<n>We employ a zero-shot prompting strategy with carefully designed cues to guide the model in interpreting and scoring transcribed clinical interviews.<n>Our approach, tested on 236 real-world interviews, demonstrates strong correlations with clinician assessments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-07T08:49:04Z)
• AI Hospital: Benchmarking Large Language Models in a Multi-agent Medical Interaction Simulator [69.51568871044454]
  We introduce textbfAI Hospital, a framework simulating dynamic medical interactions between emphDoctor as player and NPCs. This setup allows for realistic assessments of LLMs in clinical scenarios. We develop the Multi-View Medical Evaluation benchmark, utilizing high-quality Chinese medical records and NPCs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-15T06:46:48Z)
• Learning to diagnose cirrhosis from radiological and histological labels with joint self and weakly-supervised pretraining strategies [62.840338941861134]
  We propose to leverage transfer learning from large datasets annotated by radiologists, to predict the histological score available on a small annex dataset. We compare different pretraining methods, namely weakly-supervised and self-supervised ones, to improve the prediction of the cirrhosis. This method outperforms the baseline classification of the METAVIR score, reaching an AUC of 0.84 and a balanced accuracy of 0.75.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-16T17:06:23Z)
• Controlling False Positive/Negative Rates for Deep-Learning-Based Prostate Cancer Detection on Multiparametric MR images [58.85481248101611]
  We propose a novel PCa detection network that incorporates a lesion-level cost-sensitive loss and an additional slice-level loss based on a lesion-to-slice mapping function. Our experiments based on 290 clinical patients concludes that 1) The lesion-level FNR was effectively reduced from 0.19 to 0.10 and the lesion-level FPR was reduced from 1.03 to 0.66 by changing the lesion-level cost.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-04T09:51:27Z)
• Lymph Node Graph Neural Networks for Cancer Metastasis Prediction [0.342658286826597]
  We present a novel graph-based approach to incorporate imaging characteristics of existing cancer spread to local lymph nodes. We trained an edge-gated Graph Convolutional Network (Gated-GCN) to accurately predict the risk of distant metastasis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-03T09:28:14Z)
• AMINN: Autoencoder-based Multiple Instance Neural Network for Outcome Prediction of Multifocal Liver Metastases [1.7294318054149134]
  Multifocality occurs frequently in colorectal cancer liver metastases. Most existing biomarkers do not take the imaging features of all multifocal lesions into account. We present an end-to-end autoencoder-based multiple instance neural network (AMINN) for the prediction of survival outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-12T17:52:14Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.