Adversarial Training Improves Generalization Under Distribution Shifts in Bioacoustics
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.13727v1
- Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2025 08:16:13 GMT
- Title: Adversarial Training Improves Generalization Under Distribution Shifts in Bioacoustics
- Authors: René Heinrich, Lukas Rauch, Bernhard Sick, Christoph Scholz,
- Abstract summary: The study focuses on two model architectures: a conventional convolutional neural network (ConvNeXt) and an inherently interpretable prototype-based model (AudioProtoPNet)<n>The approach is evaluated using a challenging bird sound classification benchmark.<n>Results show that adversarial training, particularly using output-space attacks, improves clean test data performance by an average of 10.5% relative.
- Score: 1.49199020343864
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Adversarial training is a promising strategy for enhancing model robustness against adversarial attacks. However, its impact on generalization under substantial data distribution shifts in audio classification remains largely unexplored. To address this gap, this work investigates how different adversarial training strategies improve generalization performance and adversarial robustness in audio classification. The study focuses on two model architectures: a conventional convolutional neural network (ConvNeXt) and an inherently interpretable prototype-based model (AudioProtoPNet). The approach is evaluated using a challenging bird sound classification benchmark. This benchmark is characterized by pronounced distribution shifts between training and test data due to varying environmental conditions and recording methods, a common real-world challenge. The investigation explores two adversarial training strategies: one based on output-space attacks that maximize the classification loss function, and another based on embedding-space attacks designed to maximize embedding dissimilarity. These attack types are also used for robustness evaluation. Additionally, for AudioProtoPNet, the study assesses the stability of its learned prototypes under targeted embedding-space attacks. Results show that adversarial training, particularly using output-space attacks, improves clean test data performance by an average of 10.5% relative and simultaneously strengthens the adversarial robustness of the models. These findings, although derived from the bird sound domain, suggest that adversarial training holds potential to enhance robustness against both strong distribution shifts and adversarial attacks in challenging audio classification settings.
Related papers
- Adversarial Training for Defense Against Label Poisoning Attacks [53.893792844055106]
Label poisoning attacks pose significant risks to machine learning models.<n>We propose a novel adversarial training defense strategy based on support vector machines (SVMs) to counter these threats.<n>Our approach accommodates various model architectures and employs a projected gradient descent algorithm with kernel SVMs for adversarial training.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-24T13:03:19Z) - Detecting Adversarial Data using Perturbation Forgery [28.237738842260615]
adversarial detection aims to identify and filter out adversarial data from the data flow based on discrepancies in distribution and noise patterns between natural and adversarial data.<n>New attacks based on generative models with imbalanced and anisotropic noise patterns evade detection.<n>We propose Perturbation Forgery, which includes noise distribution, sparse mask generation, and pseudo-adversarial data production, to train an adversarial detector capable of detecting any unseen gradient-based, generative-based, and physical adversarial attacks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-25T13:34:16Z) - Outlier Robust Adversarial Training [57.06824365801612]
We introduce Outlier Robust Adversarial Training (ORAT) in this work.
ORAT is based on a bi-level optimization formulation of adversarial training with a robust rank-based loss function.
We show that the learning objective of ORAT satisfies the $mathcalH$-consistency in binary classification, which establishes it as a proper surrogate to adversarial 0/1 loss.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-10T21:36:38Z) - Adversarial Training Should Be Cast as a Non-Zero-Sum Game [121.95628660889628]
Two-player zero-sum paradigm of adversarial training has not engendered sufficient levels of robustness.
We show that the commonly used surrogate-based relaxation used in adversarial training algorithms voids all guarantees on robustness.
A novel non-zero-sum bilevel formulation of adversarial training yields a framework that matches and in some cases outperforms state-of-the-art attacks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-19T16:00:48Z) - TWINS: A Fine-Tuning Framework for Improved Transferability of
Adversarial Robustness and Generalization [89.54947228958494]
This paper focuses on the fine-tuning of an adversarially pre-trained model in various classification tasks.
We propose a novel statistics-based approach, Two-WIng NormliSation (TWINS) fine-tuning framework.
TWINS is shown to be effective on a wide range of image classification datasets in terms of both generalization and robustness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-20T14:12:55Z) - Improving Adversarial Robustness with Self-Paced Hard-Class Pair
Reweighting [5.084323778393556]
adversarial training with untargeted attacks is one of the most recognized methods.
We find that the naturally imbalanced inter-class semantic similarity makes those hard-class pairs to become the virtual targets of each other.
We propose to upweight hard-class pair loss in model optimization, which prompts learning discriminative features from hard classes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-26T22:51:36Z) - Enhancing Adversarial Training with Feature Separability [52.39305978984573]
We introduce a new concept of adversarial training graph (ATG) with which the proposed adversarial training with feature separability (ATFS) enables to boost the intra-class feature similarity and increase inter-class feature variance.
Through comprehensive experiments, we demonstrate that the proposed ATFS framework significantly improves both clean and robust performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-02T04:04:23Z) - Self-Ensemble Adversarial Training for Improved Robustness [14.244311026737666]
Adversarial training is the strongest strategy against various adversarial attacks among all sorts of defense methods.
Recent works mainly focus on developing new loss functions or regularizers, attempting to find the unique optimal point in the weight space.
We devise a simple but powerful emphSelf-Ensemble Adversarial Training (SEAT) method for yielding a robust classifier by averaging weights of history models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-18T01:12:18Z) - Adversarial Robustness of Deep Reinforcement Learning based Dynamic
Recommender Systems [50.758281304737444]
We propose to explore adversarial examples and attack detection on reinforcement learning-based interactive recommendation systems.
We first craft different types of adversarial examples by adding perturbations to the input and intervening on the casual factors.
Then, we augment recommendation systems by detecting potential attacks with a deep learning-based classifier based on the crafted data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-02T04:12:24Z) - REGroup: Rank-aggregating Ensemble of Generative Classifiers for Robust
Predictions [6.0162772063289784]
Defense strategies that adopt adversarial training or random input transformations typically require retraining or fine-tuning the model to achieve reasonable performance.
We find that we can learn a generative classifier by statistically characterizing the neural response of an intermediate layer to clean training samples.
Our proposed approach uses a subset of the clean training data and a pre-trained model, and yet is agnostic to network architectures or the adversarial attack generation method.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-18T17:07:19Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.