From Extraction to Synthesis: Entangled Heuristics for Agent-Augmented Strategic Reasoning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.13768v1
• Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2025 09:26:37 GMT
• Title: From Extraction to Synthesis: Entangled Heuristics for Agent-Augmented Strategic Reasoning
• Authors: Renato Ghisellini, Remo Pareschi, Marco Pedroni, Giovanni Battista Raggi,
• Abstract summary: We present a hybrid architecture for agent-augmented strategic reasoning.<n>We draw on sources ranging from classical military theory to contemporary corporate strategy.<n>Our system fuses conflicting cognitions into coherent and context-sensitive narratives.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We present a hybrid architecture for agent-augmented strategic reasoning, combining heuristic extraction, semantic activation, and compositional synthesis. Drawing on sources ranging from classical military theory to contemporary corporate strategy, our model activates and composes multiple heuristics through a process of semantic interdependence inspired by research in quantum cognition. Unlike traditional decision engines that select the best rule, our system fuses conflicting heuristics into coherent and context-sensitive narratives, guided by semantic interaction modeling and rhetorical framing. We demonstrate the framework via a Meta vs. FTC case study, with preliminary validation through semantic metrics. Limitations and extensions (e.g., dynamic interference tuning) are discussed.

Related papers

• Modal Logic for Stratified Becoming: Actualization Beyond Possible Worlds [55.2480439325792]
  This article develops a novel framework for modal logic based on the idea of stratified actualization.<n>Traditional Kripke semantics treat modal operators as quantification over fully determinate alternatives.<n>We propose a system Stratified Actualization Logic (SAL) in which modalities are indexed by levels of ontological stability, interpreted as admissibility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-12T18:35:01Z)
• Motion-R1: Chain-of-Thought Reasoning and Reinforcement Learning for Human Motion Generation [31.484189825477877]
  Motion-R1 is a unified motion-language modeling framework that integrates a Chain-of-Thought mechanism.<n>By explicitly decomposing complex textual instructions into logically structured action paths, Motion-R1 provides high-level semantic guidance for motion generation.<n>Experiments across multiple benchmark datasets demonstrate that Motion-R1 achieves competitive or superior performance compared to state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-12T05:21:43Z)
• Controlled Agentic Planning & Reasoning for Mechanism Synthesis [8.273778202041365]
  This work presents a dual-agent Large Language Model (LLM)-based reasoning method for mechanism synthesis.<n>It is capable of reasoning at both linguistic and symbolic levels to generate geometrical and dynamic outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-23T08:16:32Z)
• Recommending Actionable Strategies: A Semantic Approach to Integrating Analytical Frameworks with Decision Heuristics [0.0]
  We present a novel approach for recommending actionable strategies by integrating strategic frameworks with decisions through semantic analysis.<n>Our methodology bridges this gap using advanced natural language processing (NLP), demonstrated through integrating frameworks like the 6C model with the Thirty-Six Stratagems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-24T16:53:37Z)
• A process algebraic framework for multi-agent dynamic epistemic systems [55.2480439325792]
  We propose a unifying framework for modeling and analyzing multi-agent, knowledge-based, dynamic systems. On the modeling side, we propose a process algebraic, agent-oriented specification language that makes such a framework easy to use for practical purposes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-24T08:35:50Z)
• K-Level Reasoning: Establishing Higher Order Beliefs in Large Language Models for Strategic Reasoning [76.3114831562989]
  It requires Large Language Model (LLM) agents to adapt their strategies dynamically in multi-agent environments. We propose a novel framework: "K-Level Reasoning with Large Language Models (K-R)"
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-02T16:07:05Z)
• Knowledge-Enhanced Hierarchical Information Correlation Learning for Multi-Modal Rumor Detection [82.94413676131545]
  We propose a novel knowledge-enhanced hierarchical information correlation learning approach (KhiCL) for multi-modal rumor detection. KhiCL exploits cross-modal joint dictionary to transfer the heterogeneous unimodality features into the common feature space. It extracts visual and textual entities from images and text, and designs a knowledge relevance reasoning strategy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-28T06:08:20Z)
• Multimodal Relation Extraction with Cross-Modal Retrieval and Synthesis [89.04041100520881]
  This research proposes to retrieve textual and visual evidence based on the object, sentence, and whole image. We develop a novel approach to synthesize the object-level, image-level, and sentence-level information for better reasoning between the same and different modalities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-25T15:26:13Z)
• Modeling Non-Cooperative Dialogue: Theoretical and Empirical Insights [11.462075538526703]
  We investigate the ability of agents to identify non-cooperative interlocutors while completing a concurrent visual-dialogue task. We use the tools of learning theory to develop a theoretical model for identifying non-cooperative interlocutors and apply this theory to analyze different communication strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-15T02:08:41Z)
• RESPER: Computationally Modelling Resisting Strategies in Persuasive Conversations [0.7505101297221454]
  We propose a generalised framework for identifying resisting strategies in persuasive conversations. Our experiments reveal the asymmetry of power roles in non-collaborative goal-directed conversations. We also investigate the role of different resisting strategies on the conversation outcome.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-26T03:44:17Z)
• A Dependency Syntactic Knowledge Augmented Interactive Architecture for End-to-End Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis [73.74885246830611]
  We propose a novel dependency syntactic knowledge augmented interactive architecture with multi-task learning for end-to-end ABSA. This model is capable of fully exploiting the syntactic knowledge (dependency relations and types) by leveraging a well-designed Dependency Relation Embedded Graph Convolutional Network (DreGcn) Extensive experimental results on three benchmark datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-04T14:59:32Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.