Recommending Actionable Strategies: A Semantic Approach to Integrating Analytical Frameworks with Decision Heuristics

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.14634v1
• Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 16:53:37 GMT
• Title: Recommending Actionable Strategies: A Semantic Approach to Integrating Analytical Frameworks with Decision Heuristics
• Authors: Renato Ghisellini, Remo Pareschi, Marco Pedroni, Giovanni Battista Raggi,
• Abstract summary: We present a novel approach for recommending actionable strategies by integrating strategic frameworks with decisions through semantic analysis. Our methodology bridges this gap using advanced natural language processing (NLP), demonstrated through integrating frameworks like the 6C model with the Thirty-Six Stratagems.
• Score: 0.0
• License:
• Abstract: We present a novel approach for recommending actionable strategies by integrating strategic frameworks with decision heuristics through semantic analysis. While strategy frameworks provide systematic models for assessment and planning, and decision heuristics encode experiential knowledge,these traditions have historically remained separate. Our methodology bridges this gap using advanced natural language processing (NLP), demonstrated through integrating frameworks like the 6C model with the Thirty-Six Stratagems. The approach employs vector space representations and semantic similarity calculations to map framework parameters to heuristic patterns, supported by a computational architecture that combines deep semantic processing with constrained use of Large Language Models. By processing both primary content and secondary elements (diagrams, matrices) as complementary linguistic representations, we demonstrate effectiveness through corporate strategy case studies. The methodology generalizes to various analytical frameworks and heuristic sets, culminating in a plug-and-play architecture for generating recommender systems that enable cohesive integration of strategic frameworks and decision heuristics into actionable guidance.

Related papers

• A Survey of Model Architectures in Information Retrieval [64.75808744228067]
  We focus on two key aspects: backbone models for feature extraction and end-to-end system architectures for relevance estimation. We trace the development from traditional term-based methods to modern neural approaches, particularly highlighting the impact of transformer-based models and subsequent large language models (LLMs) We conclude by discussing emerging challenges and future directions, including architectural optimizations for performance and scalability, handling of multimodal, multilingual data, and adaptation to novel application domains beyond traditional search paradigms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-20T18:42:58Z)
• Towards a Unified View of Preference Learning for Large Language Models: A Survey [88.66719962576005]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit remarkably powerful capabilities. One of the crucial factors to achieve success is aligning the LLM's output with human preferences. We decompose all the strategies in preference learning into four components: model, data, feedback, and algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-04T15:11:55Z)
• Transformer-based Named Entity Recognition with Combined Data Representation [0.0]
  The study investigates data representation strategies, including single, merged, and context, which respectively use one sentence, multiple sentences, and sentences joined with attention to context per vector. Analysis shows that training models with a single strategy may lead to poor performance on different data representations. To address this limitation, the study proposes a combined training procedure that utilizes all three strategies to improve model stability and adaptability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-25T11:41:16Z)
• LLM as a Mastermind: A Survey of Strategic Reasoning with Large Language Models [75.89014602596673]
  Strategic reasoning requires understanding and predicting adversary actions in multi-agent settings while adjusting strategies accordingly. We explore the scopes, applications, methodologies, and evaluation metrics related to strategic reasoning with Large Language Models. It underscores the importance of strategic reasoning as a critical cognitive capability and offers insights into future research directions and potential improvements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-01T16:50:54Z)
• Cross-domain Chinese Sentence Pattern Parsing [67.1381983012038]
  Sentence Pattern Structure (SPS) parsing is a syntactic analysis method primarily employed in language teaching. Existing SPSs rely heavily on textbook corpora for training, lacking cross-domain capability. This paper proposes an innovative approach leveraging large language models (LLMs) within a self-training framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-26T05:30:48Z)
• SymbolicAI: A framework for logic-based approaches combining generative models and solvers [9.841285581456722]
  We introduce SymbolicAI, a versatile and modular framework employing a logic-based approach to concept learning and flow management in generative processes. We treat large language models (LLMs) as semantic solvers that execute tasks based on both natural and formal language instructions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-01T18:50:50Z)
• Contextualization Distillation from Large Language Model for Knowledge Graph Completion [51.126166442122546]
  We introduce the Contextualization Distillation strategy, a plug-in-and-play approach compatible with both discriminative and generative KGC frameworks. Our method begins by instructing large language models to transform compact, structural triplets into context-rich segments. Comprehensive evaluations across diverse datasets and KGC techniques highlight the efficacy and adaptability of our approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-28T08:56:49Z)
• A Holistic Approach to Unifying Automatic Concept Extraction and Concept Importance Estimation [18.600321051705482]
  Concept-based approaches have emerged as some of the most promising explainability methods. We introduce a unifying theoretical framework that comprehensively defines and clarifies these two steps. We show how to efficiently identify clusters of data points that are classified based on a similar shared strategy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-11T23:28:02Z)
• Architectures of Meaning, A Systematic Corpus Analysis of NLP Systems [0.0]
  The framework is validated in the full corpus of Semeval tasks. It provides a systematic mechanism to interpret a largely dynamic and exponentially growing field.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-16T21:10:43Z)
• How Far are We from Effective Context Modeling? An Exploratory Study on Semantic Parsing in Context [59.13515950353125]
  We present a grammar-based decoding semantic parsing and adapt typical context modeling methods on top of it. We evaluate 13 context modeling methods on two large cross-domain datasets, and our best model achieves state-of-the-art performances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-03T11:28:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.