K-Level Reasoning: Establishing Higher Order Beliefs in Large Language Models for Strategic Reasoning
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.01521v2
- Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 16:08:15 GMT
- Title: K-Level Reasoning: Establishing Higher Order Beliefs in Large Language Models for Strategic Reasoning
- Authors: Yadong Zhang, Shaoguang Mao, Tao Ge, Xun Wang, Yan Xia, Man Lan, Furu Wei,
- Abstract summary: It requires Large Language Model (LLM) agents to adapt their strategies dynamically in multi-agent environments.
We propose a novel framework: "K-Level Reasoning with Large Language Models (K-R)"
- Score: 76.3114831562989
- License:
- Abstract: Strategic reasoning is a complex yet essential capability for intelligent agents. It requires Large Language Model (LLM) agents to adapt their strategies dynamically in multi-agent environments. Unlike static reasoning tasks, success in these contexts depends on anticipating other agents' beliefs and actions while continuously adjusting strategies to achieve individual goals. LLMs and LLM agents often struggle with strategic reasoning due to the absence of a reasoning framework that enables them to dynamically infer others' perspectives and adapt to changing environments. Inspired by the Level-K framework from game theory and behavioral economics, which extends reasoning from simple reactions to structured strategic depth, we propose a novel framework: "K-Level Reasoning with Large Language Models (K-R)." This framework employs recursive mechanisms to enable LLMs to achieve varying levels of strategic depth, allowing agents to form higher order beliefs - beliefs about others' beliefs. We validate this framework through rigorous testing on four testbeds: two classical game theory problems and two social intelligence tasks. The results demonstrate the advantages of K-R in strategic reasoning. Our work presents the first recursive implementation of strategic depth in large language models (LLMs). It establishes a foundation for future research into theory of mind and strategic reasoning in LLMs.
Related papers
- Meta Reasoning for Large Language Models [58.87183757029041]
We introduce Meta-Reasoning Prompting (MRP), a novel and efficient system prompting method for large language models (LLMs)
MRP guides LLMs to dynamically select and apply different reasoning methods based on the specific requirements of each task.
We evaluate the effectiveness of MRP through comprehensive benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-17T16:14:11Z) - GameBench: Evaluating Strategic Reasoning Abilities of LLM Agents [4.209869303518743]
We introduce GameBench, a cross-domain benchmark for evaluating strategic reasoning abilities of large language models.
Our evaluations use GPT-3 and GPT-4 in their base form along with two scaffolding frameworks designed to enhance strategic reasoning ability: Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting and Reasoning Via Planning (RAP)
Our results show that none of the tested models match human performance, and at worst GPT-4 performs worse than random action.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-07T00:28:43Z) - STRIDE: A Tool-Assisted LLM Agent Framework for Strategic and Interactive Decision-Making [43.734386326024016]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized natural language processing, showing remarkable linguistic proficiency and reasoning capabilities.
This paper presents a novel framework equipped with memory and specialized tools to enhance their strategic decision-making capabilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-25T23:25:10Z) - LLM as a Mastermind: A Survey of Strategic Reasoning with Large Language Models [75.89014602596673]
Strategic reasoning requires understanding and predicting adversary actions in multi-agent settings while adjusting strategies accordingly.
We explore the scopes, applications, methodologies, and evaluation metrics related to strategic reasoning with Large Language Models.
It underscores the importance of strategic reasoning as a critical cognitive capability and offers insights into future research directions and potential improvements.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-01T16:50:54Z) - GTBench: Uncovering the Strategic Reasoning Limitations of LLMs via Game-Theoretic Evaluations [87.99872683336395]
Large Language Models (LLMs) are integrated into critical real-world applications.
This paper evaluates LLMs' reasoning abilities in competitive environments.
We first propose GTBench, a language-driven environment composing 10 widely recognized tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-19T18:23:36Z) - ALYMPICS: LLM Agents Meet Game Theory -- Exploring Strategic
Decision-Making with AI Agents [77.34720446306419]
Alympics is a systematic simulation framework utilizing Large Language Model (LLM) agents for game theory research.
Alympics creates a versatile platform for studying complex game theory problems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-06T16:03:46Z) - From Heuristic to Analytic: Cognitively Motivated Strategies for
Coherent Physical Commonsense Reasoning [66.98861219674039]
Heuristic-Analytic Reasoning (HAR) strategies drastically improve the coherence of rationalizations for model decisions.
Our findings suggest that human-like reasoning strategies can effectively improve the coherence and reliability of PLM reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-24T19:46:04Z) - Strategic Reasoning with Language Models [35.63300060111918]
Strategic reasoning enables agents to cooperate, communicate, and compete with other agents in diverse situations.
Existing approaches to solving strategic games rely on extensive training, yielding strategies that do not generalize to new scenarios or games without retraining.
This paper introduces an approach that uses pretrained Large Language Models with few-shot chain-of-thought examples to enable strategic reasoning for AI agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-30T16:09:19Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.