K-Level Reasoning: Establishing Higher Order Beliefs in Large Language Models for Strategic Reasoning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.01521v2
• Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 16:08:15 GMT
• Title: K-Level Reasoning: Establishing Higher Order Beliefs in Large Language Models for Strategic Reasoning
• Authors: Yadong Zhang, Shaoguang Mao, Tao Ge, Xun Wang, Yan Xia, Man Lan, Furu Wei,
• Abstract summary: It requires Large Language Model (LLM) agents to adapt their strategies dynamically in multi-agent environments. We propose a novel framework: "K-Level Reasoning with Large Language Models (K-R)"
• Score: 76.3114831562989
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Strategic reasoning is a complex yet essential capability for intelligent agents. It requires Large Language Model (LLM) agents to adapt their strategies dynamically in multi-agent environments. Unlike static reasoning tasks, success in these contexts depends on anticipating other agents' beliefs and actions while continuously adjusting strategies to achieve individual goals. LLMs and LLM agents often struggle with strategic reasoning due to the absence of a reasoning framework that enables them to dynamically infer others' perspectives and adapt to changing environments. Inspired by the Level-K framework from game theory and behavioral economics, which extends reasoning from simple reactions to structured strategic depth, we propose a novel framework: "K-Level Reasoning with Large Language Models (K-R)." This framework employs recursive mechanisms to enable LLMs to achieve varying levels of strategic depth, allowing agents to form higher order beliefs - beliefs about others' beliefs. We validate this framework through rigorous testing on four testbeds: two classical game theory problems and two social intelligence tasks. The results demonstrate the advantages of K-R in strategic reasoning. Our work presents the first recursive implementation of strategic depth in large language models (LLMs). It establishes a foundation for future research into theory of mind and strategic reasoning in LLMs.

Related papers

• More at Stake: How Payoff and Language Shape LLM Agent Strategies in Cooperation Dilemmas [1.6487772637295166]
  LLMs increasingly act as autonomous agents in interactive and multi-agent settings.<n>We investigate how payoff magnitude and linguistic context shape LLM strategies in repeated social dilemmas.<n>Across models and languages, we observe consistent behavioral patterns, including incentive-sensitive conditional strategies and cross-linguistic divergence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-27T01:36:50Z)
• rSIM: Incentivizing Reasoning Capabilities of LLMs via Reinforced Strategy Injection [49.74493901036598]
  Large language models (LLMs) are post-trained through reinforcement learning (RL) to evolve into Reasoning Language Models (RLMs)<n>This paper proposes a novel reinforced strategy injection mechanism (rSIM) that enables any LLM to become an RLM by employing a small planner.<n> Experimental results show that rSIM enables Qwen2.5-0.5B to become an RLM and significantly outperform Qwen2.5-14B.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-09T06:55:39Z)
• Emergent Hierarchical Reasoning in LLMs through Reinforcement Learning [56.496001894673235]
  Reinforcement Learning (RL) has proven highly effective at enhancing the complex reasoning abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>Our analysis reveals that puzzling phenomena like aha moments", length-scaling'' and entropy dynamics are not disparate occurrences but hallmarks of an emergent reasoning hierarchy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-03T18:52:49Z)
• CHBench: A Cognitive Hierarchy Benchmark for Evaluating Strategic Reasoning Capability of LLMs [10.29314561183905]
  Game-playing ability serves as an indicator for evaluating the strategic reasoning capability of large language models.<n>We propose CHBench, a novel evaluation framework inspired by the cognitive hierarchy models from behavioral economics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-16T07:10:26Z)
• WGSR-Bench: Wargame-based Game-theoretic Strategic Reasoning Benchmark for Large Language Models [28.28739884703072]
  This paper introduces WGSR-Bench, the first strategy reasoning benchmark for Large Language Models (LLMs) using wargame as its evaluation environment.<n>We design test samples around three core tasks, i.e., Environmental situation awareness, Opponent risk modeling and Policy generation, to systematically assess main abilities of strategic reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-12T01:16:34Z)
• LLM Agents for Bargaining with Utility-based Feedback [23.357706450282002]
  We introduce a comprehensive framework centered on utility-based feedback.<n>Our contributions are threefold: (1) BargainArena, a novel benchmark dataset; (2) human-aligned, economically-grounded evaluation metrics inspired by utility theory; and (3) a structured feedback mechanism enabling LLMs to iteratively refine their bargaining strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T02:07:27Z)
• ReMA: Learning to Meta-think for LLMs with Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [54.787341008881036]
  We introduce Reinforced Meta-thinking Agents (ReMA), a novel framework that leverages Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) to elicit meta-thinking behaviors. ReMA decouples the reasoning process into two hierarchical agents: a high-level meta-thinking agent responsible for generating strategic oversight and plans, and a low-level reasoning agent for detailed executions. Experimental results demonstrate that ReMA outperforms single-agent RL baselines on complex reasoning tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-12T16:05:31Z)
• EPO: Explicit Policy Optimization for Strategic Reasoning in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning [69.55982246413046]
  We propose explicit policy optimization (EPO) for strategic reasoning. EPO provides strategies in open-ended action space and can be plugged into arbitrary LLM agents to motivate goal-directed behavior. Experiments across social and physical domains demonstrate EPO's ability of long-term goal alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-18T03:15:55Z)
• Approximating Human Strategic Reasoning with LLM-Enhanced Recursive Reasoners Leveraging Multi-agent Hypergames [3.5083201638203154]
  We implement a role-based multi-agent strategic interaction framework tailored to sophisticated reasoners. We use one-shot, 2-player beauty contests to evaluate the reasoning capabilities of the latest LLMs. Our experiments show that artificial reasoners can outperform the baseline model in terms of both approximating human behaviour and reaching the optimal solution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-11T10:37:20Z)
• Game-theoretic LLM: Agent Workflow for Negotiation Games [30.83905391503607]
  This paper investigates the rationality of large language models (LLMs) in strategic decision-making contexts. We design multiple game-theoretic that guide the reasoning and decision-making processes of LLMs. The findings have implications for the development of more robust and strategically sound AI agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-08T22:02:22Z)
• Meta Reasoning for Large Language Models [58.87183757029041]
  We introduce Meta-Reasoning Prompting (MRP), a novel and efficient system prompting method for large language models (LLMs) MRP guides LLMs to dynamically select and apply different reasoning methods based on the specific requirements of each task. We evaluate the effectiveness of MRP through comprehensive benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T16:14:11Z)
• GameBench: Evaluating Strategic Reasoning Abilities of LLM Agents [4.209869303518743]
  We introduce GameBench, a cross-domain benchmark for evaluating strategic reasoning abilities of large language models. Our evaluations use GPT-3 and GPT-4 in their base form along with two scaffolding frameworks designed to enhance strategic reasoning ability: Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting and Reasoning Via Planning (RAP) Our results show that none of the tested models match human performance, and at worst GPT-4 performs worse than random action.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-07T00:28:43Z)
• STRIDE: A Tool-Assisted LLM Agent Framework for Strategic and Interactive Decision-Making [43.734386326024016]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized natural language processing, showing remarkable linguistic proficiency and reasoning capabilities. This paper presents a novel framework equipped with memory and specialized tools to enhance their strategic decision-making capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-25T23:25:10Z)
• LLM as a Mastermind: A Survey of Strategic Reasoning with Large Language Models [75.89014602596673]
  Strategic reasoning requires understanding and predicting adversary actions in multi-agent settings while adjusting strategies accordingly. We explore the scopes, applications, methodologies, and evaluation metrics related to strategic reasoning with Large Language Models. It underscores the importance of strategic reasoning as a critical cognitive capability and offers insights into future research directions and potential improvements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-01T16:50:54Z)
• GTBench: Uncovering the Strategic Reasoning Limitations of LLMs via Game-Theoretic Evaluations [87.99872683336395]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are integrated into critical real-world applications. This paper evaluates LLMs' reasoning abilities in competitive environments. We first propose GTBench, a language-driven environment composing 10 widely recognized tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-19T18:23:36Z)
• ALYMPICS: LLM Agents Meet Game Theory -- Exploring Strategic Decision-Making with AI Agents [77.34720446306419]
  Alympics is a systematic simulation framework utilizing Large Language Model (LLM) agents for game theory research. Alympics creates a versatile platform for studying complex game theory problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-06T16:03:46Z)
• From Heuristic to Analytic: Cognitively Motivated Strategies for Coherent Physical Commonsense Reasoning [66.98861219674039]
  Heuristic-Analytic Reasoning (HAR) strategies drastically improve the coherence of rationalizations for model decisions. Our findings suggest that human-like reasoning strategies can effectively improve the coherence and reliability of PLM reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-24T19:46:04Z)
• Strategic Reasoning with Language Models [35.63300060111918]
  Strategic reasoning enables agents to cooperate, communicate, and compete with other agents in diverse situations. Existing approaches to solving strategic games rely on extensive training, yielding strategies that do not generalize to new scenarios or games without retraining. This paper introduces an approach that uses pretrained Large Language Models with few-shot chain-of-thought examples to enable strategic reasoning for AI agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-30T16:09:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.