The Levers of Political Persuasion with Conversational AI
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.13919v1
- Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2025 13:50:09 GMT
- Title: The Levers of Political Persuasion with Conversational AI
- Authors: Kobi Hackenburg, Ben M. Tappin, Luke Hewitt, Ed Saunders, Sid Black, Hause Lin, Catherine Fist, Helen Margetts, David G. Rand, Christopher Summerfield,
- Abstract summary: There are widespread fears that conversational AI could soon exert unprecedented influence over human beliefs.<n>We show that the persuasive power of current and near-future AI is likely to stem more from post-training and prompting methods.
- Score: 4.6244198651412045
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: There are widespread fears that conversational AI could soon exert unprecedented influence over human beliefs. Here, in three large-scale experiments (N=76,977), we deployed 19 LLMs-including some post-trained explicitly for persuasion-to evaluate their persuasiveness on 707 political issues. We then checked the factual accuracy of 466,769 resulting LLM claims. Contrary to popular concerns, we show that the persuasive power of current and near-future AI is likely to stem more from post-training and prompting methods-which boosted persuasiveness by as much as 51% and 27% respectively-than from personalization or increasing model scale. We further show that these methods increased persuasion by exploiting LLMs' unique ability to rapidly access and strategically deploy information and that, strikingly, where they increased AI persuasiveness they also systematically decreased factual accuracy.
Related papers
- Perceived Political Bias in LLMs Reduces Persuasive Abilities [0.0]
We test whether credibility attacks reduce LLM-based persuasion.<n>A short message indicating that the LLM was biased against the respondent's party attenuated persuasion by 28%.<n>These findings suggest that the persuasive impact of conversational AI is politically contingent, constrained by perceptions of partisan alignment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-20T09:33:16Z) - Evaluating & Reducing Deceptive Dialogue From Language Models with Multi-turn RL [64.3268313484078]
Large Language Models (LLMs) interact with millions of people worldwide in applications such as customer support, education and healthcare.<n>Their ability to produce deceptive outputs, whether intentionally or inadvertently, poses significant safety concerns.<n>We investigate the extent to which LLMs engage in deception within dialogue, and propose the belief misalignment metric to quantify deception.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-16T05:29:36Z) - Persuasion and Safety in the Era of Generative AI [0.0]
The EU AI Act prohibits AI systems that use manipulative or deceptive techniques to undermine informed decision-making.<n>My dissertation addresses the lack of empirical studies in this area by developing a taxonomy of persuasive techniques.<n>It provides resources to mitigate the risks of persuasive AI and fosters discussions on ethical persuasion in the age of generative AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-18T06:04:46Z) - Large Language Models Are More Persuasive Than Incentivized Human Persuaders [32.72764895955829]
We compare the persuasion capabilities of a frontier large language model (LLM) against incentivized human persuaders in an online quiz setting.<n>LLM persuaders achieved significantly higher compliance with their directional persuasion attempts than incentivized human persuaders.<n>Our findings suggest that AI's persuasion capabilities already exceed those of humans that have real-money bonuses tied to performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-14T14:31:33Z) - Must Read: A Systematic Survey of Computational Persuasion [60.83151988635103]
AI-driven persuasion can be leveraged for beneficial applications, but also poses threats through manipulation and unethical influence.<n>Our survey outlines future research directions to enhance the safety, fairness, and effectiveness of AI-powered persuasion.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-12T17:26:31Z) - AI persuading AI vs AI persuading Humans: LLMs' Differential Effectiveness in Promoting Pro-Environmental Behavior [70.24245082578167]
Pro-environmental behavior (PEB) is vital to combat climate change, yet turning awareness into intention and action remains elusive.<n>We explore large language models (LLMs) as tools to promote PEB, comparing their impact across 3,200 participants.<n>Results reveal a "synthetic persuasion paradox": synthetic and simulated agents significantly affect their post-intervention PEB stance, while human responses barely shift.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-03T21:40:55Z) - Persuade Me if You Can: A Framework for Evaluating Persuasion Effectiveness and Susceptibility Among Large Language Models [9.402740034754455]
Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate persuasive capabilities that rival human-level persuasion.<n>LLMs' susceptibility to persuasion raises concerns about alignment with ethical principles.<n>We introduce Persuade Me If You Can (PMIYC), an automated framework for evaluating persuasion through multi-agent interactions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-03T18:53:21Z) - Persuasion with Large Language Models: a Survey [49.86930318312291]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have created new disruptive possibilities for persuasive communication.
In areas such as politics, marketing, public health, e-commerce, and charitable giving, such LLM Systems have already achieved human-level or even super-human persuasiveness.
Our survey suggests that the current and future potential of LLM-based persuasion poses profound ethical and societal risks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-11T10:05:52Z) - Measuring and Improving Persuasiveness of Large Language Models [12.134372070736596]
We introduce PersuasionBench and PersuasionArena to measure the persuasiveness of generative models automatically.
Our findings carry key implications for both model developers and policymakers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-03T16:36:35Z) - How Johnny Can Persuade LLMs to Jailbreak Them: Rethinking Persuasion to
Challenge AI Safety by Humanizing LLMs [66.05593434288625]
This paper introduces a new perspective to jailbreak large language models (LLMs) as human-like communicators.
We apply a persuasion taxonomy derived from decades of social science research to generate persuasive adversarial prompts (PAP) to jailbreak LLMs.
PAP consistently achieves an attack success rate of over $92%$ on Llama 2-7b Chat, GPT-3.5, and GPT-4 in $10$ trials.
On the defense side, we explore various mechanisms against PAP and, found a significant gap in existing defenses.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-12T16:13:24Z) - Fairness in AI and Its Long-Term Implications on Society [68.8204255655161]
We take a closer look at AI fairness and analyze how lack of AI fairness can lead to deepening of biases over time.
We discuss how biased models can lead to more negative real-world outcomes for certain groups.
If the issues persist, they could be reinforced by interactions with other risks and have severe implications on society in the form of social unrest.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-16T11:22:59Z) - Artificial Influence: An Analysis Of AI-Driven Persuasion [0.0]
We warn that ubiquitous highlypersuasive AI systems could alter our information environment so significantly so as to contribute to a loss of human control of our own future.
We conclude that none of these solutions will be airtight, and that individuals and governments will need to take active steps to guard against the most pernicious effects of persuasive AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-15T16:05:11Z) - The Threat of Offensive AI to Organizations [52.011307264694665]
This survey explores the threat of offensive AI on organizations.
First, we discuss how AI changes the adversary's methods, strategies, goals, and overall attack model.
Then, through a literature review, we identify 33 offensive AI capabilities which adversaries can use to enhance their attacks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-30T01:03:28Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.