Mining Voter Behaviour and Confidence: A Rule-Based Analysis of the 2022 U.S. Elections

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.14236v1
• Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2025 12:25:12 GMT
• Title: Mining Voter Behaviour and Confidence: A Rule-Based Analysis of the 2022 U.S. Elections
• Authors: Md Al Jubair, Mohammad Shamsul Arefin, Ahmed Wasif Reza,
• Abstract summary: This study explores the relationship between voter trust and their experiences during elections.<n>It applies a rule-based data mining technique to the 2022 Survey of the Performance of American Elections.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
• Abstract: This study explores the relationship between voter trust and their experiences during elections by applying a rule-based data mining technique to the 2022 Survey of the Performance of American Elections (SPAE). Using the Apriori algorithm and setting parameters to capture meaningful associations (support >= 3%, confidence >= 60%, and lift > 1.5), the analysis revealed a strong connection between demographic attributes and voting-related challenges, such as registration hurdles, accessibility issues, and queue times. For instance, respondents who indicated that accessing polling stations was "very easy" and who reported moderate confidence were found to be over six times more likely (lift = 6.12) to trust their county's election outcome and experience no registration issues. A further analysis, which adjusted the support threshold to 2%, specifically examined patterns among minority voters. It revealed that 98.16 percent of Black voters who reported easy access to polling locations also had smooth registration experiences. Additionally, those who had high confidence in the vote-counting process were almost two times as likely to identify as Democratic Party supporters. These findings point to the important role that enhancing voting access and offering targeted support can play in building trust in the electoral system, particularly among marginalized communities.

Related papers

• 3+ Seat Risk-Limiting Audits for Single Transferable Vote Elections [56.12949230611067]
  We present an assertion-based approach to conducting full or partial RLAs for STV elections with three or more seats.<n>We show that we can quite often form partial audits that verify most, and sometimes all, of the reported winners.<n>We evaluate our method on a dataset of over 500 three- and four-seat STV elections from the 2017 and 2022 local council elections in Scotland.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-19T00:29:53Z)
• Efficient Lower Bounding of Single Transferable Vote Election Margins [56.12949230611067]
  Single transferable vote (STV) is a system of preferential proportional voting employed in multi-seat elections.<n>The margin of victory, or simply'margin', is the smallest number of ballots that need to be manipulated to alter the set of winners.<n>Lower bounds on the margin can also be used for this purpose, in cases where exact margins are difficult to compute.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-24T13:39:23Z)
• Improving the Computational Efficiency of Adaptive Audits of IRV Elections [54.427049258408424]
  AWAIRE can audit IRV contests with any number of candidates, but the original implementation incurred memory and computation costs that grew superexponentially with the number of candidates. This paper improves the algorithmic implementation of AWAIRE in three ways that make it practical to audit IRV contests with 55 candidates, compared to the previous 6 candidates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-23T13:28:00Z)
• Intelligo ut Confido: Understanding, Trust and User Experience in Verifiable Receipt-Free E-Voting (long version) [1.306972554821087]
  We present a study with 300 participants which aims to evaluate the voters' experience of the receipt-freeness procedures in the e-voting protocol Selene. While the usability and trust factors were rated low in the experiments, we found a positive correlation between trust and understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-18T07:49:39Z)
• E-Vote Your Conscience: Perceptions of Coercion and Vote Buying, and the Usability of Fake Credentials in Online Voting [1.0721573281744934]
  Online voting is more susceptible to voter coercion and vote buying than in-person voting. One mitigation is to give voters fake voting credentials that they can yield to a coercer. Fake credentials appear identical to real ones, but cast votes that are silently omitted from the final tally.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-18T10:57:32Z)
• Publicly auditable privacy-preserving electoral rolls [0.32498796510544625]
  We study the problem of designing publicly auditable yet privacy-preserving electoral rolls. The audit can detect polling-day ballot stuffing and denials to eligible voters by malicious polling officers. The entire electoral roll is never revealed, which prevents any large-scale systematic voter targeting and manipulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-18T13:11:48Z)
• The Decisive Power of Indecision: Low-Variance Risk-Limiting Audits and Election Contestation via Marginal Mark Recording [51.82772358241505]
  Risk-limiting audits (RLAs) are techniques for verifying the outcomes of large elections. We define new families of audits that improve efficiency and offer advances in statistical power. New audits are enabled by revisiting the standard notion of a cast-vote record so that it can declare multiple possible mark interpretations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-09T16:23:54Z)
• Improving the Security of United States Elections with Robust Optimization [5.454428371457422]
  We introduce the first formal approach to designing test decks with rigorous security guarantees. Our approach has since been piloted in real-world elections by the Michigan Bureau of Elections.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-04T13:17:53Z)
• Adaptively Weighted Audits of Instant-Runoff Voting Elections: AWAIRE [61.872917066847855]
  Methods for auditing instant-runoff voting (IRV) elections are either not risk-limiting or require cast vote records (CVRs), the voting system's electronic record of the votes on each ballot. We develop an RLA method that uses adaptively weighted averages of test supermartingales to efficiently audit IRV elections when CVRs are not available.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-20T15:55:34Z)
• Measuring and mitigating voting access disparities: a study of race and polling locations in Florida and North Carolina [6.236769041115903]
  Voter suppression and associated racial disparities in access to voting are long-standing civil rights concerns in the U.S. We quantify access to polling locations, developing a methodology for the calibrated measurement of racial disparities in polling location "load" and distance to polling locations. Applying these algorithms on the 2020 election location data helps to expose and explore tradeoffs between the cost of allocating more polling locations and the potential impact on access disparities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-30T06:13:19Z)
• TRIP: Trust-Limited Coercion-Resistant In-Person Voter Registration [1.0244919633049518]
  One promising mitigation strategy enables voters to give a coercer fake voting credentials, which silently cast votes that do not count. We present TRIP, the first voter registration scheme that addresses these challenges by leveraging the physical security of in-person interaction. Voters use a kiosk in a privacy booth to print real and fake paper credentials, which appear indistinguishable to others. For verifiability, each credential includes an interactive zero-knowledge proof, which is sound in real credentials and unsound in fake credentials.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-14T13:35:46Z)
• Leveraging Administrative Data for Bias Audits: Assessing Disparate Coverage with Mobility Data for COVID-19 Policy [61.60099467888073]
  We show how linking administrative data can enable auditing mobility data for bias. We show that older and non-white voters are less likely to be captured by mobility data. We show that allocating public health resources based on such mobility data could disproportionately harm high-risk elderly and minority groups.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-14T02:04:14Z)
• Electoral Forecasting Using a Novel Temporal Attenuation Model: Predicting the US Presidential Elections [91.3755431537592]
  We develop a novel macro-scale temporal attenuation (TA) model, which uses pre-election poll data to improve forecasting accuracy. Our hypothesis is that the timing of publicizing opinion polls plays a significant role in how opinion oscillates, especially right before elections. We present two different implementations of the TA model, which accumulate an average forecasting error of 2.8-3.28 points over the 48-year period.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-30T09:21:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.