From Disagreement to Understanding: The Case for Ambiguity Detection in NLI

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.15114v2
• Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2025 01:20:38 GMT
• Title: From Disagreement to Understanding: The Case for Ambiguity Detection in NLI
• Authors: Chathuri Jayaweera, Bonnie J. Dorr,
• Abstract summary: This position paper argues that annotation disagreement in Natural Language Inference (NLI) is not mere noise but often reflects meaningful variation.<n>We call for a shift toward ambiguity-aware NLI that first identifies ambiguous input pairs, classifies their types, and only then proceeds to inference.
• Score: 3.5164356851161984
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: This position paper argues that annotation disagreement in Natural Language Inference (NLI) is not mere noise but often reflects meaningful variation, especially when triggered by ambiguity in the premise or hypothesis. While underspecified guidelines and annotator behavior contribute to variation, content-based ambiguity provides a process-independent signal of divergent human perspectives. We call for a shift toward ambiguity-aware NLI that first identifies ambiguous input pairs, classifies their types, and only then proceeds to inference. To support this shift, we present a framework that incorporates ambiguity detection and classification prior to inference. We also introduce a unified taxonomy that synthesizes existing taxonomies, illustrates key subtypes with examples, and motivates targeted detection methods that better align models with human interpretation. Although current resources lack datasets explicitly annotated for ambiguity and subtypes, this gap presents an opportunity: by developing new annotated resources and exploring unsupervised approaches to ambiguity detection, we enable more robust, explainable, and human-aligned NLI systems.

Related papers

• Ambiguity-aware Point Cloud Segmentation by Adaptive Margin Contrastive Learning [65.94127546086156]
  We propose an adaptive margin contrastive learning method for semantic segmentation on point clouds.<n>We first design AMContrast3D, a method comprising contrastive learning into an ambiguity estimation framework.<n>Inspired by the insight of joint training, we propose AMContrast3D++ integrating with two branches trained in parallel.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-09T07:00:32Z)
• Trick or Neat: Adversarial Ambiguity and Language Model Evaluation [42.62991342963119]
  We assess language models' sensitivity to ambiguity by introducing an adversarial ambiguity dataset.<n>Our findings show that direct prompting fails to robustly identify ambiguity, while linear probes trained on model representations can decode ambiguity with high accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-01T22:50:06Z)
• Subjective Logic Encodings [20.458601113219697]
  Data perspectivism seeks to leverage inter-annotator disagreement to learn models.<n>Subjective Logic SLEs is a framework for constructing classification targets that explicitly encodes annotations as opinions of the annotators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T15:14:10Z)
• Localizing Factual Inconsistencies in Attributable Text Generation [91.981439746404]
  We introduce QASemConsistency, a new formalism for localizing factual inconsistencies in attributable text generation. We first demonstrate the effectiveness of the QASemConsistency methodology for human annotation. We then implement several methods for automatically detecting localized factual inconsistencies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-09T22:53:48Z)
• Zero and Few-shot Semantic Parsing with Ambiguous Inputs [45.285508941560295]
  We introduce AmP, a framework, dataset, and challenge for translating ambiguous natural language to formal representations like logic and code. Using AmP, we investigate how several few-shot text-to-code systems handle ambiguity, introducing three new metrics. We find that large pre-trained models perform poorly at capturing the distribution of possible meanings without deliberate instruction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T15:46:36Z)
• We're Afraid Language Models Aren't Modeling Ambiguity [136.8068419824318]
  Managing ambiguity is a key part of human language understanding. We characterize ambiguity in a sentence by its effect on entailment relations with another sentence. We show that a multilabel NLI model can flag political claims in the wild that are misleading due to ambiguity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-27T17:57:58Z)
• Human-Guided Fair Classification for Natural Language Processing [9.652938946631735]
  We show how to leverage unsupervised style transfer and GPT-3's zero-shot capabilities to generate semantically similar sentences that differ along sensitive attributes. We validate the generated pairs via an extensive crowdsourcing study, which confirms that a lot of these pairs align with human intuition about fairness in the context of toxicity classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-20T10:46:40Z)
• A Latent-Variable Model for Intrinsic Probing [93.62808331764072]
  We propose a novel latent-variable formulation for constructing intrinsic probes.<n>We find empirical evidence that pre-trained representations develop a cross-lingually entangled notion of morphosyntax.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-20T15:01:12Z)
• Where and What? Examining Interpretable Disentangled Representations [96.32813624341833]
  Capturing interpretable variations has long been one of the goals in disentanglement learning. Unlike the independence assumption, interpretability has rarely been exploited to encourage disentanglement in the unsupervised setting. In this paper, we examine the interpretability of disentangled representations by investigating two questions: where to be interpreted and what to be interpreted.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-07T11:22:02Z)
• Dive into Ambiguity: Latent Distribution Mining and Pairwise Uncertainty Estimation for Facial Expression Recognition [59.52434325897716]
  We propose a solution, named DMUE, to address the problem of annotation ambiguity from two perspectives. For the former, an auxiliary multi-branch learning framework is introduced to better mine and describe the latent distribution in the label space. For the latter, the pairwise relationship of semantic feature between instances are fully exploited to estimate the ambiguity extent in the instance space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-01T03:21:57Z)
• Infusing Finetuning with Semantic Dependencies [62.37697048781823]
  We show that, unlike syntax, semantics is not brought to the surface by today's pretrained models. We then use convolutional graph encoders to explicitly incorporate semantic parses into task-specific finetuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-10T01:27:24Z)
• Asking without Telling: Exploring Latent Ontologies in Contextual Representations [12.69022456384102]
  We show that pretrained contextual encoders learn to encode meaningful notions of linguistic structure without explicit supervision. Our results provide new evidence of emergent structure in pretrained encoders, including departures from existing annotations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-29T23:20:40Z)
• Fundamental Tradeoffs between Invariance and Sensitivity to Adversarial Perturbations [65.05561023880351]
  Adversarial examples are malicious inputs crafted to induce misclassification. This paper studies a complementary failure mode, invariance-based adversarial examples. We show that defenses against sensitivity-based attacks actively harm a model's accuracy on invariance-based attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-11T18:50:23Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.